![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That is the question.
I always use a duolock type clip for crank baits. I do that for two reasons. First is because I feel it gives me a much better action than tieing driectly onto the nose ring of a crank bait. The second is because of being able to change baits quickly. I have had circumstances where I have caught a couple fish and then the stopped hitting, but they would still chase. As soon as I changed colors or body styles just slightly I would nail a couple more int he same place. I know some guys can break off and retie quickly, but I feel the pressure of time with bait in the boat instead of the water. Now lets get to topwater. With buzz baits, except some swimming minnow types or a Norman's weeedwhacker you have to tie directly on, but I'm talking about stick minnows or poppers. I usually work these baits on the same rods as I do crank baits for much the same reason. To keep fish from pulling loose on a run. As a result they often get put on the clip that I already have tied onto the line. I also seem to get a lot of fouling of the bait particularly when working a stick bait like an Excalibur spittin image all the way back to the boat. I am wondering if eliminating the clip will reduce the back and forth action just enough to keep the bait from over running the line and fouling. -- ** Public Fishing and Boating Forums ** www.YumaBassMan.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bob La Londe" wrote in message ... That is the question. I always use a duolock type clip for crank baits. I do that for two reasons. First is because I feel it gives me a much better action than tieing driectly onto the nose ring of a crank bait. The second is because of being able to change baits quickly. I have had circumstances where I have caught a couple fish and then the stopped hitting, but they would still chase. As soon as I changed colors or body styles just slightly I would nail a couple more int he same place. I know some guys can break off and retie quickly, but I feel the pressure of time with bait in the boat instead of the water. Now lets get to topwater. With buzz baits, except some swimming minnow types or a Norman's weeedwhacker you have to tie directly on, but I'm talking about stick minnows or poppers. I usually work these baits on the same rods as I do crank baits for much the same reason. To keep fish from pulling loose on a run. As a result they often get put on the clip that I already have tied onto the line. I also seem to get a lot of fouling of the bait particularly when working a stick bait like an Excalibur spittin image all the way back to the boat. I am wondering if eliminating the clip will reduce the back and forth action just enough to keep the bait from over running the line and fouling. Unless I'm forced to use a leader, usually wire because of pike/muskie cutoffs, I rarely use a snap or clip. I have had snaps open up when I'm really pressuring a fish, so I try to avoid that when ever possible. I do however realize that some crankbaits have reduced action when the line is tied directly. So, for lures like that, I simply put a split ring on the line tie and cut/retie when I want to change lures. Yes, I know that this takes a little bit of time, but I also found that I had a tendency to go too long on retying and lost fish too. I prefer to have as few connections between me and the fish as possible, especially ones that are easy to open like a snap. Tying direct might solve the topwater problem, hard saying. -- Steve @ OutdoorFrontiers http://www.outdoorfrontiers.com G & S Guide Service and Custom Rods http://www.herefishyfishy.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Some crankbaits, like the Luhr Jensen Speed Trap, come with high-quality
clips rather than split rings. If used to unclip a lure and put another in its place, it's no longer on the original lure. You either snip it off and retie, or eventually put on split rings, or buy another pack of clips. I agree with Steve... my concern is my going too long without retying, where the knot becomes strained by pulling free from hang-ups, or the lower several feet of line becomes abraded and weakened. If I had the self discipline to check you line regularly and retie, I might do well whether I used rings or clips. Otherwise, being forced to retie every time I switch lures takes care of the problem. Another point... while I'm a big proponent of changing or adapting lures to meet changing conditions, or switching lures as I experiment to find one that triggers bass to strike, I've fished with several guys who spend too much time tinkering with their tackle and too little time fishing. Rather than change lures frequently, I'd recommend looking at other variables.... lure placement and presentation, or retrieve rate and pattern, for example. A clip might tempt me to switch up too frequently. Joe Haubenreich -- Staring at a computer screen? Rather be fishing? Free SWL background at: www.secretweaponlures.com/scrsvr.htm _______________________ "Steve @ OutdoorFrontiers" wrote in message ... Unless I'm forced to use a leader, usually wire because of pike/muskie cutoffs, I rarely use a snap or clip. I have had snaps open up when I'm really pressuring a fish, so I try to avoid that when ever possible. I do however realize that some crankbaits have reduced action when the line is tied directly. So, for lures like that, I simply put a split ring on the line tie and cut/retie when I want to change lures. Yes, I know that this takes a little bit of time, but I also found that I had a tendency to go too long on retying and lost fish too. I prefer to have as few connections between me and the fish as possible, especially ones that are easy to open like a snap. Tying direct might solve the topwater problem, hard saying. -- Steve @ OutdoorFrontiers http://www.outdoorfrontiers.com G & S Guide Service and Custom Rods http://www.herefishyfishy.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I solve the clip failure problem by simpley tossing them in the trash after
a bunch of hard fishing. Three or four times a day normally or anytime they get too distorted. I have noticed I get more line failures from damaged line than from knot failure since I went back to tying a half blood or trilene or modified clinch (or whatever you want to call it) knot. Lots of guys don't like clips, and that ok. I always say if its working for you don't let somebody talk you into changing. Something I forget sometimes. -- ** Public Fishing and Boating Forums ** www.YumaBassMan.com "Steve @ OutdoorFrontiers" wrote in message ... "Bob La Londe" wrote in message ... That is the question. I always use a duolock type clip for crank baits. I do that for two reasons. First is because I feel it gives me a much better action than tieing driectly onto the nose ring of a crank bait. The second is because of being able to change baits quickly. I have had circumstances where I have caught a couple fish and then the stopped hitting, but they would still chase. As soon as I changed colors or body styles just slightly I would nail a couple more int he same place. I know some guys can break off and retie quickly, but I feel the pressure of time with bait in the boat instead of the water. Now lets get to topwater. With buzz baits, except some swimming minnow types or a Norman's weeedwhacker you have to tie directly on, but I'm talking about stick minnows or poppers. I usually work these baits on the same rods as I do crank baits for much the same reason. To keep fish from pulling loose on a run. As a result they often get put on the clip that I already have tied onto the line. I also seem to get a lot of fouling of the bait particularly when working a stick bait like an Excalibur spittin image all the way back to the boat. I am wondering if eliminating the clip will reduce the back and forth action just enough to keep the bait from over running the line and fouling. Unless I'm forced to use a leader, usually wire because of pike/muskie cutoffs, I rarely use a snap or clip. I have had snaps open up when I'm really pressuring a fish, so I try to avoid that when ever possible. I do however realize that some crankbaits have reduced action when the line is tied directly. So, for lures like that, I simply put a split ring on the line tie and cut/retie when I want to change lures. Yes, I know that this takes a little bit of time, but I also found that I had a tendency to go too long on retying and lost fish too. I prefer to have as few connections between me and the fish as possible, especially ones that are easy to open like a snap. Tying direct might solve the topwater problem, hard saying. -- Steve @ OutdoorFrontiers http://www.outdoorfrontiers.com G & S Guide Service and Custom Rods http://www.herefishyfishy.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I too have had split rings on my stick and crank baits for as long as
I can remember. I first did it to lessen the places a weed or other chaf could attach to my lure. I also have had snaps open on me. It's no fun to watch a hard fought fish swim away with your lure in its mouth. On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 11:08:54 -0600, "Steve @ OutdoorFrontiers" sent into the ether: "Bob La Londe" wrote in message ... That is the question. I always use a duolock type clip for crank baits. I do that for two reasons. First is because I feel it gives me a much better action than tieing driectly onto the nose ring of a crank bait. The second is because of being able to change baits quickly. I have had circumstances where I have caught a couple fish and then the stopped hitting, but they would still chase. As soon as I changed colors or body styles just slightly I would nail a couple more int he same place. I know some guys can break off and retie quickly, but I feel the pressure of time with bait in the boat instead of the water. Now lets get to topwater. With buzz baits, except some swimming minnow types or a Norman's weeedwhacker you have to tie directly on, but I'm talking about stick minnows or poppers. I usually work these baits on the same rods as I do crank baits for much the same reason. To keep fish from pulling loose on a run. As a result they often get put on the clip that I already have tied onto the line. I also seem to get a lot of fouling of the bait particularly when working a stick bait like an Excalibur spittin image all the way back to the boat. I am wondering if eliminating the clip will reduce the back and forth action just enough to keep the bait from over running the line and fouling. Unless I'm forced to use a leader, usually wire because of pike/muskie cutoffs, I rarely use a snap or clip. I have had snaps open up when I'm really pressuring a fish, so I try to avoid that when ever possible. I do however realize that some crankbaits have reduced action when the line is tied directly. So, for lures like that, I simply put a split ring on the line tie and cut/retie when I want to change lures. Yes, I know that this takes a little bit of time, but I also found that I had a tendency to go too long on retying and lost fish too. I prefer to have as few connections between me and the fish as possible, especially ones that are easy to open like a snap. Tying direct might solve the topwater problem, hard saying. Remove the x for e-mail reply www.outdoorfrontiers.com www.SecretWeaponLures.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Learn to tie a Rapala knot,Gives the action you are looking for, and
eliminates unecessary mechanical parts. -- D.Norton "Dan, danl, danny boy, Redbeard, actually Greybeard now" wrote in message ... I too have had split rings on my stick and crank baits for as long as I can remember. I first did it to lessen the places a weed or other chaf could attach to my lure. I also have had snaps open on me. It's no fun to watch a hard fought fish swim away with your lure in its mouth. On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 11:08:54 -0600, "Steve @ OutdoorFrontiers" sent into the ether: "Bob La Londe" wrote in message ... That is the question. I always use a duolock type clip for crank baits. I do that for two reasons. First is because I feel it gives me a much better action than tieing driectly onto the nose ring of a crank bait. The second is because of being able to change baits quickly. I have had circumstances where I have caught a couple fish and then the stopped hitting, but they would still chase. As soon as I changed colors or body styles just slightly I would nail a couple more int he same place. I know some guys can break off and retie quickly, but I feel the pressure of time with bait in the boat instead of the water. Now lets get to topwater. With buzz baits, except some swimming minnow types or a Norman's weeedwhacker you have to tie directly on, but I'm talking about stick minnows or poppers. I usually work these baits on the same rods as I do crank baits for much the same reason. To keep fish from pulling loose on a run. As a result they often get put on the clip that I already have tied onto the line. I also seem to get a lot of fouling of the bait particularly when working a stick bait like an Excalibur spittin image all the way back to the boat. I am wondering if eliminating the clip will reduce the back and forth action just enough to keep the bait from over running the line and fouling. Unless I'm forced to use a leader, usually wire because of pike/muskie cutoffs, I rarely use a snap or clip. I have had snaps open up when I'm really pressuring a fish, so I try to avoid that when ever possible. I do however realize that some crankbaits have reduced action when the line is tied directly. So, for lures like that, I simply put a split ring on the line tie and cut/retie when I want to change lures. Yes, I know that this takes a little bit of time, but I also found that I had a tendency to go too long on retying and lost fish too. I prefer to have as few connections between me and the fish as possible, especially ones that are easy to open like a snap. Tying direct might solve the topwater problem, hard saying. Remove the x for e-mail reply www.outdoorfrontiers.com www.SecretWeaponLures.com |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 13:05:34 -0600, "D, Norton"
sent into the ether: Learn to tie a Rapala knot,Gives the action you are looking for, and eliminates unecessary mechanical parts. Too lazy :} And the 2 knots I know took me years and years to master. :} Remove the x for e-mail reply www.outdoorfrontiers.com www.SecretWeaponLures.com |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have had bad luck with the Rapala knot weakening and eventually breaking
where it had rubbed & chafed against the eye of the lure. Conversely, I have never had a real Duolock snap open on me during use. But then again, I have never broken a rod either. Maybe it's just the luck of the draw? Bob Rickard (AKA Dr. Spinnerbait) www.secretweaponlures.com --------------------------=x O'))) ----- Original Message ----- From: "D, Norton" Newsgroups: rec.outdoors.fishing.bass Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2005 1:05 PM Subject: To Clip or Not to Clip... Learn to tie a Rapala knot,Gives the action you are looking for, and eliminates unecessary mechanical parts. -- D.Norton |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A plain old Loop Knot is easier to tie.
"Bob La Londe" wrote in message ... That is the question. I always use a duolock type clip for crank baits. I do that for two reasons. First is because I feel it gives me a much better action than tieing driectly onto the nose ring of a crank bait. The second is because of being able to change baits quickly. I have had circumstances where I have caught a couple fish and then the stopped hitting, but they would still chase. As soon as I changed colors or body styles just slightly I would nail a couple more int he same place. I know some guys can break off and retie quickly, but I feel the pressure of time with bait in the boat instead of the water. Now lets get to topwater. With buzz baits, except some swimming minnow types or a Norman's weeedwhacker you have to tie directly on, but I'm talking about stick minnows or poppers. I usually work these baits on the same rods as I do crank baits for much the same reason. To keep fish from pulling loose on a run. As a result they often get put on the clip that I already have tied onto the line. I also seem to get a lot of fouling of the bait particularly when working a stick bait like an Excalibur spittin image all the way back to the boat. I am wondering if eliminating the clip will reduce the back and forth action just enough to keep the bait from over running the line and fouling. -- ** Public Fishing and Boating Forums ** www.YumaBassMan.com |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
eh?
-- David Norton "Jerry Barton (NervisRek)" wrote in message ... A plain old Loop Knot is easier to tie. "Bob La Londe" wrote in message ... That is the question. I always use a duolock type clip for crank baits. I do that for two reasons. First is because I feel it gives me a much better action than tieing driectly onto the nose ring of a crank bait. The second is because of being able to change baits quickly. I have had circumstances where I have caught a couple fish and then the stopped hitting, but they would still chase. As soon as I changed colors or body styles just slightly I would nail a couple more int he same place. I know some guys can break off and retie quickly, but I feel the pressure of time with bait in the boat instead of the water. Now lets get to topwater. With buzz baits, except some swimming minnow types or a Norman's weeedwhacker you have to tie directly on, but I'm talking about stick minnows or poppers. I usually work these baits on the same rods as I do crank baits for much the same reason. To keep fish from pulling loose on a run. As a result they often get put on the clip that I already have tied onto the line. I also seem to get a lot of fouling of the bait particularly when working a stick bait like an Excalibur spittin image all the way back to the boat. I am wondering if eliminating the clip will reduce the back and forth action just enough to keep the bait from over running the line and fouling. -- ** Public Fishing and Boating Forums ** www.YumaBassMan.com |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Norman Speed Clip frustration | SHRED© | Bass Fishing | 4 | May 7th, 2004 02:46 PM |
To Derek M. re' line clip | fredcromer | UK Coarse Fishing | 26 | April 18th, 2004 07:30 PM |
No line clip on new mitchell reel..? | fredcromer | UK Coarse Fishing | 6 | April 1st, 2004 07:12 PM |
Bait clip | Phil Matthews | UK Coarse Fishing | 0 | December 11th, 2003 06:41 PM |