A Fishing forum. FishingBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » FishingBanter forum » rec.outdoors.fishing newsgroups » Fly Fishing
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Fluorocarbon versus...mono and affect on environment



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old May 17th, 2005, 04:51 PM
Gene Cyprych
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Fluorocarbon versus...mono and affect on environment

This may have been discussed before in this venue but what is the
conventional "take" on using flourocarbon tippet instead of mono? FC
has a 1/2 life of about a gazillion years and when I get a hang up on
the bottom, I wonder what the long term implications are for leaving a
5 foot piece of FC in the stream. Multiply that by the number of
angling days and will there be a problem?

Looking through the catalogs I see a lot of FC and little else. Is that
where the industry is going? Any thoughts on environmental impact? Use?

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 FishingBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.