![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Last fall was my first season salmon fishing on the rivers here in the
Lower Mainland (Vancouver BC), drift fishing with my old surf rod and penn reel, landing chinook of up to 30 lbs. This year I'd like to try fly fishing for pink salmon, but fear that my 5/6 weight trout kit isn't up to the job. So I need some heavier-duty fly kit for the bigger fish (10-25 lbs). But I have no clear idea how much heavier its got to be... Would an 9ft 8-weight be ridiculously inadequate? Or do I have to be looking at a double-handed rod? Quite a general question, I know, but all advice and experience is appreciated. /S |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
it really depends where you are fishing. A #6 rod will serve for Pinks
particularly in the Harrison and backwaters of the Fraser. For the big whites in the Vedder etc you should have a #9 - an #8 will do but don't expect to land many fish. No you don't need a double hand style rod. Single hand rods are better for the strip retrieve presentation typically used for coho. -- remove "Scarlet Pimpernel" wrote in message oups.com... Last fall was my first season salmon fishing on the rivers here in the Lower Mainland (Vancouver BC), drift fishing with my old surf rod and penn reel, landing chinook of up to 30 lbs. This year I'd like to try fly fishing for pink salmon, but fear that my 5/6 weight trout kit isn't up to the job. So I need some heavier-duty fly kit for the bigger fish (10-25 lbs). But I have no clear idea how much heavier its got to be... Would an 9ft 8-weight be ridiculously inadequate? Or do I have to be looking at a double-handed rod? Quite a general question, I know, but all advice and experience is appreciated. /S |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scarlet Pimpernel wrote:
Last fall was my first season salmon fishing on the rivers here in the Lower Mainland (Vancouver BC), drift fishing with my old surf rod and penn reel, landing chinook of up to 30 lbs. This year I'd like to try fly fishing for pink salmon, but fear that my 5/6 weight trout kit isn't up to the job. So I need some heavier-duty fly kit for the bigger fish (10-25 lbs). But I have no clear idea how much heavier its got to be... Would an 9ft 8-weight be ridiculously inadequate? Or do I have to be looking at a double-handed rod? Quite a general question, I know, but all advice and experience is appreciated. /S You can do OK with a 5-6 for pinks. But if there is a possibility of getting into chums (often running around the same time as pinks) or other species, then you should use at least a 7wt with a preference for heavier equipment. A 9' 8wt is OK. My preference is for a rod with a very stiff butt, regardless of whether its a 5-6 or 8 wt. To me, that is more important. 8wt is OK for chinook if it has a stiff butt. As a suggestion, consider a reel with a good drag. If you're fishing large or swift water, have plenty of backing. If you're in smaller creeks. I've never met a leader-shy salmon. You can use a heavier leader with a stiff-butt rod to land the fish a little more quickly. For leader, we use 13 - 18# Maxima mono. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4 Jul 2005 08:17:16 -0700, "Scarlet Pimpernel"
wrote: This year I'd like to try fly fishing for pink salmon, but fear that my 5/6 weight trout kit isn't up to the job. So I need some heavier-duty fly kit for the bigger fish (10-25 lbs). But I have no clear idea how much heavier its got to be... Would an 9ft 8-weight be ridiculously inadequate? Or do I have to be looking at a double-handed rod? I have fished for Chinooks (Kings) in Ontario (Saugeen River) and have landed more than a few using my Sage XP7100-4 (four piece 10 foot 7 weight). I use a Lamson V3.5 large arbor reel with steelhead tapered floating line. Great reel with a good drag. I used this same rig in Alaska last year and landed 30 inch rainbows, 15 pound Silvers (Cohos), and lots of big Chum (Dog Fish) and little pinks (humpies). I wouldn't hesitate to use a 6 weight on the pinks, but if there are other bigger species (chums, silvers) in the river, you might have more than you can handle if you hook into one. FWIW, I don't think an 8 weight would be overkill. However if the pinks are smallish, it *would* be overkill. See: http://hometown.aol.com/davplac/Alaska18-Aug04.html Dave |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
FWIW, I don't think an 8 weight would be overkill. However if the
pinks are smallish, it *would* be overkill. See: http://hometown.aol.com/davplac/Alaska18-Aug04.html I regularly use a #8. These fish average 4 to 6lbs and 7 & 8lbs are common plus the rivers are strong and wide. Often it's not a matter of the size of the fish but the line and the fly. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Scarlet Pimpernel" wrote in message This year I'd like to try fly fishing for pink salmon, but fear that my 5/6 weight trout kit isn't up to the job. So I need some heavier-duty fly kit for the bigger fish (10-25 lbs). But I have no clear idea how much heavier its got to be... Many thanks for the pointers, looks like I'm right in the ballpark with a 9' 7/8wt. Appreciate all the input ... /S |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Dallas Tx, Fly Fishers Auction April 23rd | No left turn | Fly Fishing | 0 | April 22nd, 2005 12:16 AM |
TR: Sea-run charr (*super* long, w/ pictures) | Jarmo Hurri | Fly Fishing | 40 | December 21st, 2004 03:35 AM |
Picture this.... | Guyz-N-Flyz | Fly Fishing | 73 | January 14th, 2004 04:14 PM |
Salmon in London | I | UK Game Fishing | 0 | November 24th, 2003 08:09 AM |
River Wye New bylaws to protect salmon efective 1.9.2003 | Aquazur-Dra | UK Game Fishing | 0 | October 10th, 2003 01:08 PM |