![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In California, the visibility of the water on the rivers isn't as great as
in Alaska. On the Arolik River, I could see the rainbows in holding water up to about sixty feet, the water is crystal clear. Therefore I was able to see the behavior of these rainbows when I presented the dry fly. One of the things I learned is good presentation comes into play. I know we had discussions about light weight tackle, but none of that is going to happen unless you hook the fish first. I got to witness the rainbows in the holding water against the opposite side of the river along the bank. In order to catch fish there, two things came into play, one is the delicate presentation of the fly, and the other is time, how long you can keep the fly in place before the current sweeps the line out and disturbs your presentation. I could easily see the fish in the holding water, and if I made a hard plonk of the fly, the fish there would spook and take off. Now I have a less chance of casting back there because I have already spooked the fish. I found that if I could make a soft delicate presentation in the holding water, the fish wouldn't spook. The other thing I noticed is time, how long the fly stays in the holding water before the rainbows strike. There isn't much time if you have no slack in the line before the current sweeps your fly out of position. I was counting 3-seconds, one-thousand one, one-thousand-two, one-thousand-three before the current swept my fly out of position, not nearly enough time for the fish to react in my case. To solve this problem I used the reachcast. The reachcast incorporates the a mend in the line as you make the cast. In somecases I like it better than putting in the mend after the cast because you don't have to pick up the line again, and risk disturbing the fly. The reachcast had bought me about 4 more seconds for my fly to be in place, a total of 7-seconds altogether, which was enough time for the rainbows to react before the current swept the line out of position. I had some great hook-ups along the river using the reachcast. The other place that I got to witness, was the rainbows holding in the gentle part of the river right after the riffles (choppy water). In this case the fish were faced upstream with their mouths open catching food the riffles churned up. Casting upstream about 45 degrees into the riffles were a lot easier, and watching the fly drift into the smooth section of the river made for some easy strikes. In both of these areas I just described, the fishing was consistently productive for me. Other areas was casting into the current, putting a mend in and letting the fly drift and hoping for the best. Although this wasn't as productive, it was a change of pace. I have read about these behavior in rainbows, but this is the first time I got to witness it. fwiw, -tom |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New York Rainbows | Peter A. Collin | Fly Fishing | 6 | June 17th, 2005 07:53 PM |
What is roff good for? | Larry L | Fly Fishing | 49 | November 22nd, 2004 02:54 PM |
catfishing tournament lessons learned | nlcatfish | General Discussion | 0 | June 1st, 2004 10:41 PM |
An on topic post. What I learned this winter | Stan Gula | Fly Fishing Tying | 8 | April 27th, 2004 02:14 AM |
TR: Rainbow's End (long) | Todd Enders | Fly Fishing | 3 | October 9th, 2003 06:51 PM |