Hmmm...or, McCain/WHO?! '08

McCain/Lieberman

It seems likely that he'll have some role in a...well, the way it
looking, the McCain administration, so...the major downside, it would
seem, would be that with such a team, a continued large-scale
involvement in Iraq seems assured, but OTOH, for some, that's a real big
positive...

Just something to ponder,
R

On 30-Mar-2008, wrote:

seems likely that he'll have some role in a...well, the way it
looking, the McCain administration, so...the major downside, it would
seem, would be that with such a team, a continued large-scale
involvement in Iraq seems assured, but OTOH, for some, that's a real big
positive...

Just something to ponder

I rather ponder dog feces.
That what McCain ans Lieberman remind me of
As to styayioing in Iraq
that disgusts me even more

Fred

On Mar 30, 8:44*am, wrote:
McCain/Lieberman

It seems likely that he'll have some role in a...well, the way it
looking, the McCain administration, so...the major downside, it would
seem, would be that with such a team, a continued large-scale
involvement in Iraq seems assured, but OTOH, for some, that's a real big
positive...

Just something to ponder,
R

"A real big positive..." Yeah - A hundred years of Halliburton
selling those $8 hamburgers with those $.50 pickle slices on them.
Makes you little ffascist heart go pitter patter don't it.

On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 10:44:01 -0500, wrote:

McCain/Lieberman

It seems likely that he'll have some role in a...well, the way it
looking, the McCain administration, so...the major downside, it would
seem, would be that with such a team, a continued large-scale
involvement in Iraq seems assured, but OTOH, for some, that's a real big
positive...

Just something to ponder,
R

No matter who wins, WE LOSE
--
Calling an Illegal Alien an "Undocumented Worker" is like calling a
Crack Dealer an "Unlicensed Pharmacist"

On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 10:27:25 -0700 (PDT), BJ Conner
wrote:

On Mar 30, 8:44*am, wrote:
McCain/Lieberman

It seems likely that he'll have some role in a...well, the way it
looking, the McCain administration, so...the major downside, it would
seem, would be that with such a team, a continued large-scale
involvement in Iraq seems assured, but OTOH, for some, that's a real big
positive...

Just something to ponder,
R

"A real big positive..." Yeah - A hundred years of Halliburton
selling those $8 hamburgers with those $.50 pickle slices on them.
Makes you little ffascist heart go pitter patter don't it.

And then there's the other side;

In the U.S., "liberalism" is actually extremely
statist, promoting intrusive government intervention in
the economy, and promoting the interests of groups
(racial, ethnic, sexual) over those of individuals.
There's a good reason that "liberal" is a swearword in
the U.S. It's a toxic, freedom-destroying ideology here.

On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 16:30:33 GMT, wrote:


On 30-Mar-2008, wrote:

seems likely that he'll have some role in a...well, the way it
looking, the McCain administration, so...the major downside, it would
seem, would be that with such a team, a continued large-scale
involvement in Iraq seems assured, but OTOH, for some, that's a real big
positive...

Just something to ponder

I rather ponder dog feces.

An right itt tu...

That what McCain ans Lieberman remind me of

That you ponder dog feces? Odd, but to each their own, I suppose...

As to styayioing in Iraq
that disgusts me even more

Well, sure...and if you styayioing too much, you'll grow hair on your
palms.

Fred

Who else?

Hey, it oughta help,
R

On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 19:49:26 -0700, wrote:

On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 10:44:01 -0500, wrote:

McCain/Lieberman

It seems likely that he'll have some role in a...well, the way it
looking, the McCain administration, so...the major downside, it would
seem, would be that with such a team, a continued large-scale
involvement in Iraq seems assured, but OTOH, for some, that's a real big
positive...

Just something to ponder,
R

No matter who wins, WE LOSE

Oh, goody, another includer...or, um, not...have you got a list of names
as to just who is included in this alleged "we?"

HTH,
R

On 30-Mar-2008, wrote:

No matter who wins, WE LOSE

Oh, goody, another includer...or, um, not...have you got a list of names
as to just who is included in this alleged "we?"

HTH,
R

This should have been an OT post so I apologize for continuing it as normal


You are such a red white and blue good old American boy so I just wanna ask
you how can you believe in the crap the politicians tell you much less what
you write?
What I really said was that I would rather ponder dog feces than MCain
Lieberman and Iraq
I did not say that i do such things

I cannot believe nor empathize nor understand with how you think??????

Do you think that McLanin Clinton Obama Bush Cheney Hillary

Do they think like you?
Do you think like them?

Do they truly represent and care for you and the American public or are they
just faces all rearranged and given another name?
MCcain has been a retread for 15 yrs already
Hilary is ugly as sin

And Obama
If elected he would be assasinated to deflect the real problem away from a
class war to a race war!
The rich are getting richer
The SuadI family that we support, the Kuwaitis the Abbu Dhabians
They are all wonderful and caring allies - Cmon man wake up!

Do you you try to disparage my political or anti political beliefs by
trying to make fun of me? - i.e, what I believe is bull****?
because you think I am strange or my views are?
Well esp w politcs and with what we do to our planet in my name and tax
monery this enflames me So I am ****ling strange and impassioned

You - you are way off the track.
Going the wrong way!

I think in some way you fear what I have to say and disparage it
But if you are a conscious being you know that Hilary et all is just pure
media crap.
So is American Idol Coca Cola and McCain Potato Chips

Crazy ****in world
That why I fish or at least .
To forget all this and stand in a cleanclear cold river
Catching fiash is nice but really who cares?

We are still in the grip of winter
Perhaos I am goin nuts



Fred

On 30-Mar-2008, wrote:

In the U.S., "liberalism" is actually extremely
statist, promoting intrusive government intervention in
the economy, and promoting the interests of groups
(racial, ethnic, sexual) over those of individuals.
There's a good reason that "liberal" is a swearword in
the U.S. It's a toxic, freedom-destroying ideology here.

Didnt you sink off of the Great Lakes - Lake Superior?
Are you arisen?

Fred

On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 04:32:20 GMT, wrote:

Perhaos I am goin nuts

Perhaps? Uhhhhh, I don't think "perhaps". Could be all that **** you
smoke/ingest.

Do you ever read the mumbo jumbo you write *before* you post it?

IKIWH

d;o)