![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I haven't participated here much--last year or so.
There was just too much political wrangling going on and I found it too hard to ignore. So I largely took a powder. (no not that kind. all my dollar bills are still in my wallet). So, exhibiting typical consistency on my part, the following: The republicans unanimously opposed historic health care legislation today--watered down and impotent as it was, due to their unanimous hostility for over a year now. But lose the battle they did. Or soon will, as the senate was the only reactionary chance left for them. All of which reminded me: Republicans opposed social security, originally and as recently as a few years ago. Republicans opposed the Marshall Plan after WWII. In the early 50s republicans did half-heartedly supported voting rights for southern blacks, largely because it was Yellow Dog Dixicrats who supported segregation. But after the civil rights bill passed and it became clear the new wave of black voters would all vote democratic, the republicans almost instantly switched camps and became states-rights reactionaries. They got the Ross Barnett, Bull Conner-like democrats and they've controlled the redneck south ever since. The republicans also opposed Medicare. And now they've done absolutely everything possible to give Health Insurance corporations the right continue ripping us off, and to keep upwards of 20 million citizens out of any kind of health care luck at all. I'm beginning to think this kind of stubborn resistance to needed change is a genetic condition. Rational evaluation of the evidence just doesn't support this kind of boneheaded behavior. The only thing non-obstructionist they've ever done is to drive us into near bankruptcy by slashing revenues (taxes) and giving most of that the rich, and to start a series of ill-advised and remarkably expensive wars. And I count Viet Nam in that category too, even though Johnson started it. Because everybody knows Johnson did that because he was so afraid of right-wing reaction. :-) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|