A Fishing forum. FishingBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » FishingBanter forum » rec.outdoors.fishing newsgroups » Fly Fishing
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Well, I never



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 22nd, 2010, 01:41 PM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly
Ken Fortenberry
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,594
Default Well, I never

caught a salmon before.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/ken_for...ry/5013136291/

Pink salmon were accidentally introduced into Lake Superior
in 1956. In their native habitat pink salmon return to the
stream of their birth after two years in the sea so at first
they were an odd-year only nuisance in Lake Superior streams.
They have since become an annual nuisance. Biologists think
the relatively sterile Lake Superior delayed the onset of
maturity in some fish causing a three year class instead of
a two year class so now the damn things show up in even years
too.

The streams become so full of these pests it's damn near
impossible to catch the real fish. They don't really take a
fly, I don't know what prompted that one in the photo to
smack my caddis. It like to have tore up my poor little 3wt.

--
Ken Fortenberry
  #2  
Old September 22nd, 2010, 01:48 PM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly
Frank Reid © 2010
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 579
Default Well, I never

Pest or no, they do put up a fight. Congrats on your pest eradication
program.
Frank Reid

  #3  
Old September 22nd, 2010, 02:31 PM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly
Jonathan Cook
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 64
Default Well, I never

In their native range pinks are known as one of the salmon _most_
likely to take a fly, so I don't know why they wouldn't in Lake
Superior. (It's the sockeye/kokanee that you almost have to snag to
catch.)

I don't know how quickly they start turning bad, but that one looked
like a good meal...

Jon.
  #4  
Old September 22nd, 2010, 05:43 PM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly
Ken Fortenberry
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,594
Default Well, I never

Jonathan Cook wrote:
In their native range pinks are known as one of the salmon _most_
likely to take a fly, so I don't know why they wouldn't in Lake
Superior. (It's the sockeye/kokanee that you almost have to snag to
catch.)

I don't know how quickly they start turning bad, but that one looked
like a good meal...


Well, that one took a fly but the conventional wisdom among
the locals here is that pinks rarely, if ever, take a fly.

As for eating the pinks aren't considered all that great when
they're caught in Lake Superior, when they hit the streams
most folks won't touch them. I've been told once they grow the
hump on their back and enter the streams they're practically
inedible. Of course the folks around here are pretty spoiled
when it comes to fresh seafood from the Lake. Whitefish, herring,
lake trout etc. etc.

--
Ken Fortenberry
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 FishingBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.