![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Primitive peoples around the world have long known of the magic that resides in labels. The very notion of language hinges on this crucial understanding. No one today would know of primitive or ancient peoples without this fundamental truth. There would be no history....and no one to care about the omission. But, language we have, and language with a wealth of nouns, without which, of course, it wouldn't do anyone any good at all. What use a description of what occurred without a means of conveying to whom or what it happened, or where, or when? Or of who or what caused it to happen? For that matter, whatever it was that happened constitutes an event of sorts, and describing an event (a "thing" after all) would be as impossible as useless. Without nouns (names) all one would have to work with would be verbs, adverbs, prepositions, conjunctions and a few other random bits and pieces. Pronouns (those shady little things.....nouns if mufti, if you please) couldn't exist without some sort of useful referent. And adjectives, while perhaps pretty in their own right, would quickly fade out of favor (and existence) without anything to stick to. Names, we see, are important. But they are important for more than their mere existence. There are other criteria that matter. Variety, for example, matters a great deal. In a world full people, things, places, activities, states of being and whatnot all, what could have been a rousing campfire story would still inevitably fail if everybody, every place, and every thing in it were called, Bob, for instance: "Yeah, old Bob over at Bob fell into a deep Bob of Bob and lost a couple of Bobs trying to crawl out over the Bob-sharp bobs." One senses that an inherent latent interest might lurk somewhere in there.....but only because one has a ready stock of suitable nouns that one could substitute for all the Bobs bobbing about. Without that stock no one would ever guess that it was even a story.....let alone be able to offer a reasonable interpretation or critique. So, variety is a must. But we're still not finished. Yes, it's good to have enough names to go around, and yes, we understand (intuitively....there's no need to go into the matter at great length) that a certain amount of overlap is admissible.....even desirable in some instances. Thus, there can me more than one "rock", and we are probably all willing enough to concede that rock can have more than one meaning. It may even be another genus of word (a verb, or an adjective, say) without risking the destruction of the known universe. But a noun qua noun must be the RIGHT noun.....the proper NAME of the thing.....or it is no good at all. All of which is interesting enough but....so what? Well, that last bit about the right name brings us back from an admitted digression (well, not really.....more of an introduction.....but, that rapidly becoming a lost art in these latter days, one likes to take a shot at in now and then in the probably vain hope of.....well, never mind about that for right now) to the point raised in the opening sentence. There is power in names. Not only the mundane power of lexical coherence, but often a deeper, greater and more awful power. We all know it. We've all seen it in action.....from earliest childhood right on through this morning. There are names so laden with power and mystery that they dare not be spoken except by properly trained initiates in arcane arts and sciences. Names that the wider populace may not even be allowed to know, let alone utter, for to allow it WOULD bring the universe as we know it to an abrupt end. Well, that last bit MAY not be literally true, but the stakes being decidedly near the high end of the scale, why risk it? In any case, the possibility of hyperbole notwithstanding, it is clear that some names of people and places and things are, for good or ill, imbued with (or naturally steeped in) more power than others. Anyone who thinks otherwise has never gone from a speaking engagement before an assemblage of Amish Elders to one hosted and attended by Chicago longshoremen.....and told the same jokes. Naturally, it follows that the naming of things comes with an awesome (if often unrecognized) power.....and responsibility. And THAT (at long last, some might say) brings us to the point of this whole rumination. Who gets to name stuff.....and how.....and why? Granted that there's literally a whole world (and then some) literally FULL of stuff and places that have already been named, so the job is pretty much done (however well or poorly) but there's still new stuff and people coming along all the time and still new names needed. Yes, we can.....and do.....recycle many names, but even that requires some reflection and presumably some qualifications, and entirely new stuff sometimes requires entirely new names. Well, the really new stuff probably requires the services of folks who specialize in the widgets or whatever under consideration, so we'll leave that to them.....despite the recent amusing flap over the iPad. But what about all the other stuff? "Farmer Bob's south forty" worked not only well enough, but exquisitely, throughout the tenure of several generations of Bobs, Bob juniors and seniors and Bob the thirds, but last year it got subdivided. Twelve new streets.....and they all gotta have names. Who gets that job.....and why does it ALWAYS go to someone who is blithely unaware of.....or indifferent to.....the distinction between say, a prairie and an ocean.....or a whispering pine and a powerplant? O.k., well, not QUITE always. Monroe county (presumably named in honor of an American president of roughly a couple centuries ago), Curdistan, is a roughly square county of roughly average size (that is, for Cheeselandia.....and thus for the eastern U.S. in general), occupying a space in the left center (more or less) of the state. Like counties everywhere in the country, it has numerous roads lumped into several categories.....Interstate and U.S. and state highways, county and township roads, municipal streets, avenues, lanes, boulevards, ways, circles, etc., etc. As is true in the rest of the country, the Interstate and U.S. highways enjoy more or less tightly regulated numerical names, sometimes augmented (at least in the latter) by designation (whether formally or otherwise) as the something or other "memorial highway." This also true of state highways here. All three might also have some other name assigned to them near and/or within the confines of large conurban areas.....thus, for example, the "Eisenhower" expressway in Chicago. County roads here get simple alphabetic letter designations. Strikes many people from other places as odd, but it is a simple and serviceable method. If there's more than twenty county highways?. Well, then you pick up after Cty. Z with AA, AB....or BB.....or whatever two letter combination. What IS a bit odd is that there are a good few THREE letter county highways in the state. No idea why that is. City streets are a bewildering cesspit of inscrutability. I won't touch that. And then there's the township roads. Outside the cities, outside the suburbs, outside even the villages. These are roads whose care and upkeep is presumably the responsibility of the various townships (six mile squares.....usually) that subdivide the various counties into manageable units. I have no idea who is responsible for naming roads at the township level.....or for pretty much anything else at that level, for that matter. I get the distinct impression that pretty much no one else does either. Things just sort of get done.....or not. In any case, generally speaking, township road names tend to reflect the characteristics and interests and heritage of the land and its occupants. Beaver dam road pretty much speaks for itself, as does Olafsen lane. The township, the county, the state, and the nation are all littered (although not exclusively) with such sensible names. And we have such names here in Monroe county.....a few of them......but...... But here in Monroe county, somewhere, at some time or other, someone operating at the level of countywide or higher authority took it upon him or herself to name the township roads (or most of them, anyway) according to scheme unique in my experience or that of anyone else I've talked to about the matter. In doing so, he or she has implicitly recognized (and more or less bowed to) the power in names.....and simultaneously robbed those here in Monroe of any power that would naturally have adhered to them, leaving only a modicum of organizational value in its stead. Anyone interested can find the rest of the puzzle he http://www.dot.wisconsin.gov/travel/...ies/monroe.pdf giles remember, we read from left to right, top to bottom. ![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 31, 1:29*pm, Giles wrote:
[snip of interesting observations on the power of names] But here in Monroe county, somewhere, at some time or other, someone operating at the level of countywide or higher authority took it upon him or herself to name the township roads (or most of them, anyway) according to scheme unique in my experience or that of anyone else I've talked to about the matter. *In doing so, he or she has implicitly recognized (and more or less bowed to) the power in names.....and simultaneously robbed those here in Monroe of any power that would naturally have adhered to them, leaving only a modicum of organizational value in its stead. Anyone interested can find the rest of the puzzle he http://www.dot.wisconsin.gov/travel/...ies/monroe.pdf giles remember, we read from left to right, top to bottom. * * ![]() Speaking as someone who has more than once been accused of being anal-retentive and obsessive-compulsive, and whose entire professional career (cataloging) could be considered to be founded on those two traits: That's just insane. What sort of twisted mind came up with that scheme, and even worse, who agreed and said that it was a good idea? Chuck Vance (and worst of all, who was given the task of actually choosing and assigning those names?) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 2, 10:24*am, Conan The Librarian wrote:
* *Speaking as someone who has more than once been accused of being anal-retentive and obsessive-compulsive, and whose entire professional career (cataloging) could be considered to be founded on those two traits: Hm..... Well, if a "career" (presumably paid) based on those traits merits accusations......then what are we to make of those who do this sort of **** for its entertainment value? ![]() * *That's just insane. *What sort of twisted mind came up with that scheme, and even worse, who agreed and said that it was a good idea? A bit of subsequent research (a very small bit) reveals that its been before......or since.....at any rate, in other places. Denver dabbled in it, among others. I know a neighborhood in South Milwaukee (an incorporated city in its own right, not just a part of The City) where it was done on a very small scale. But your question is a good one.....and one that would likely take a good deal more ferreting than Google is up to. In fact, one of the more intriguing insights available here is that The Information Highway is really more potholes than pavement. The answers easily found are those that EVERYBODY wants......which is to say, mostly useless.....and even less interesting. * * * Chuck Vance (and worst of all, who was given the task of actually choosing and assigning those names?) Truly a worthy cause for a genuine scholar, I think. A mystery steeped in history, lexicography, politics, personal narrative, psychology......all with a liberal application (one presumes) of brute force and ignorance. Or maybe it was all done in good humor......and nobody gave a rat's ass.....or understood. ![]() giles |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|