![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's official. Kerry has chosen John Edwards as his running mate.
I don't see how Edwards is going to help. The South is a cold lock cinch for Shrub, so he's no help there, the battleground states are Pennsylvania, Ohio, maybe Michigan, rust belt states where the Dems have to get out the union vote. A lot of those folks can't even understand one drawled word Breck Boy says and don't cotton to ultra-rich "populists" at any rate. Big tactical error, in my opinion. He should have gone with Gephardt. -- Ken Fortenberry |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 14:16:43 GMT, Ken Fortenberry
wrote: It's official. Kerry has chosen John Edwards as his running mate. I don't see how Edwards is going to help. The South is a cold lock cinch for Shrub, so he's no help there, the battleground states are Pennsylvania, Ohio, maybe Michigan, rust belt states where the Dems have to get out the union vote. A lot of those folks can't even understand one drawled word Breck Boy says and don't cotton to ultra-rich "populists" at any rate. Big tactical error, in my opinion. He should have gone with Gephardt. That assumes that Gebhardt would have gone with Kerry. I said yesterday that Kerry was testing Gebhardt's honor, and it appears he still has it. Contrary to what some say, I am well-aware that there are Dems with ethics, honor, and a sense of right and wrong...and again, as long as Attila McAuliffe, the Clintonistas, the Gorons, the Carvellians, etc., are in charge of the party, they'll not get into the Oval Office...a Gebhardt-Dean (but not a Dean-Gebhardt) ticket might have actually been good for the country, and a ticket of Gebhardt and McCain (in no particular order), might have been a real winner (and in more ways then votes)...well, except for McAuliffe, etc. And as an aside, the Kerry-Heinz clan and the Edwards family, those real solid, knows-what-the-middle-class-is-feeling, common families are spending some time together...at the Heinz estate... And as a second aside, I don't know a lot about Edwards, but from what I do know, he appears to be more politically "big picture" naive than without honor or ethics, but I am interested to see what the future holds when the RNC starts replaying Kerry's slams of Edwards... TC, R |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6 Jul 2004 15:04:46 GMT, Scott Seidman
wrote: wrote in news:r0ele010a8v6qsvd9vclm4do4hgbmqhkdu@ 4ax.com: And as a second aside, I don't know a lot about Edwards, but from what I do know, he appears to be more politically "big picture" naive than without honor or ethics, but I am interested to see what the future holds when the RNC starts replaying Kerry's slams of Edwards... Hopefully, the image of Cheney being carted away in handcuffs will null that out! Scott Um, OK...and maybe the image of Nick and Jessica buying groceries will have something to do with something, too... R |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It doesn't matter.....
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why not?
Mark "Dave LaCourse" wrote in message ... It doesn't matter..... |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mark H. Bowen" wrote...
"Dave LaCourse" wrote... It doesn't matter..... Why not? Because this election is about pro-Bush / anti-Bush, not about the other candidates. -- TL, Tim ------------------------ http://css.sbcma.com/timj |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message
gy.com... It's official. Kerry has chosen John Edwards as his running mate. I don't see how Edwards is going to help. The South is a cold lock cinch for Shrub, so he's no help there, the battleground states are Pennsylvania, Ohio, maybe Michigan, rust belt states where the Dems have to get out the union vote. A lot of those folks can't even understand one drawled word Breck Boy says and don't cotton to ultra-rich "populists" at any rate. Big tactical error, in my opinion. He should have gone with Gephardt. -- Ken Fortenberry IMO Edwards will boost Kerry the way picking Gore boosted Clinton. A handsome face, poor-southern-boy-made-good (differing from Gore here, obviously), miles clear of shady ethics rumors. I don't think most voters see too much difference between rich and ultra-rich, or parse the the distinction between populist and 'populist.' Heck, some good ol' boys I know consider GWB a populist, tho this seems to be because he's so... unsophisticated. As someone suggested above, the focus if any will be on Edwards vs. Cheney, and Edwards wins there on just about any count. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6 Jul 2004 15:04:46 GMT, Scott Seidman wrote:
wrote in news:r0ele010a8v6qsvd9vclm4do4hgbmqhkdu@ 4ax.com: And as a second aside, I don't know a lot about Edwards, but from what I do know, he appears to be more politically "big picture" naive than without honor or ethics, but I am interested to see what the future holds when the RNC starts replaying Kerry's slams of Edwards... Hopefully, the image of Cheney being carted away in handcuffs will null that out! BWAHAHAHAHA! Hilarious! I still think Shrub ditches Cheney and goes with Guiliani... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|