![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A fishing life offers all sorts of opportunities for mini-epiphanies
and I've recently tripped over one that's worth mentioning. "Why do we fish?" For all of us, it's more than just catching fish, but the "catching" is always required somewhere in the mix. The social aspects plus the opportunity to innovate has always been much higher than "catching", on my priority list. As is obvious with such priorities, my "catching" suffers. Frankly, I don't put nearly as much effort into it as I should. But when I ask this hard question again, am I ordering my priorities this way because they suit me or in part because I don't want to make the effort to move beyond an average level of "catching"? In other words, am I hiding behind my priorities to save myself the bother of doing the "catching" right? Enter the minimalist angler as a highly effective angler. I've always loaded myself up with bulging vest, stuffed pockets, spare spools, spare rods in the car, all precautions against not having the right thing to satisfy picky trout. But this load of gear is really a recognition that I haven't taken the time, haven't made the effort to know what I'm doing. I have burdened myself physically with armloads of gear to avoid having to take on the mental burden of selecting just what is necessary and no more –- to avoid having to know what I'm doing. So here I am on Whitemans, wet wading, one small fly box, one spool of tippet, one rod, one reel, and thinking about what I am actually doing instead of just chucking the contents of multiple flyboxes at unimpressed fish. Before I left the house, I had decided where I would fish using the right bug for that water, time of day, and at that point in the season. Bingo, epiphany time. By forcing a minimalist approach, I have to really know what I'm doing as there's no margin for error. I've stripped away the excuses, the multiple flybox crutches, and faced the fish armed with a handful of flies and my wits. Stripped of the superfluous gear, I'm reading water, examining bugs, search bankside bushes, catching fish, and in the process, discover that there's an amazing mental clarity to the minimalist approach. Is it more fun? You betchya. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I fade back and forth from carrying tons of gear to next to
nothing...somtimes my shirt pockets are all that I fill and other times it's my entire angling bag....I prefer minimalist, but when I'm having a rough time I end to carry everything known to man just in case. Tim Apple |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I fade back and forth from carrying tons of gear to next to
nothing...somtimes my shirt pockets are all that I fill and other times it's my entire angling bag....I prefer minimalist, but when I'm having a rough time I end to carry everything known to man just in case. Tim Apple |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Charles" wrote... A fishing life offers all sorts of opportunities for mini-epiphanies and I've recently tripped over one that's worth mentioning. "Why do we fish?" For all of us, it's more than just catching fish, but the "catching" is always required somewhere in the mix. The social aspects plus the opportunity to innovate has always been much higher than "catching", on my priority list. As is obvious with such priorities, my "catching" suffers. Frankly, I don't put nearly as much effort into it as I should. But when I ask this hard question again, am I ordering my priorities this way because they suit me or in part because I don't want to make the effort to move beyond an average level of "catching"? In other words, am I hiding behind my priorities to save myself the bother of doing the "catching" right? Enter the minimalist angler as a highly effective angler. I've always loaded myself up with bulging vest, stuffed pockets, spare spools, spare rods in the car, all precautions against not having the right thing to satisfy picky trout. But this load of gear is really a recognition that I haven't taken the time, haven't made the effort to know what I'm doing. I have burdened myself physically with armloads of gear to avoid having to take on the mental burden of selecting just what is necessary and no more -- to avoid having to know what I'm doing. So here I am on Whitemans, wet wading, one small fly box, one spool of tippet, one rod, one reel, and thinking about what I am actually doing instead of just chucking the contents of multiple flyboxes at unimpressed fish. Before I left the house, I had decided where I would fish using the right bug for that water, time of day, and at that point in the season. Bingo, epiphany time. By forcing a minimalist approach, I have to really know what I'm doing as there's no margin for error. I've stripped away the excuses, the multiple flybox crutches, and faced the fish armed with a handful of flies and my wits. Stripped of the superfluous gear, I'm reading water, examining bugs, search bankside bushes, catching fish, and in the process, discover that there's an amazing mental clarity to the minimalist approach. Is it more fun? You betchya. I've often thought about this myself, though I've yet to be driven enough to take any action. Several modern pioneers of fly fishing have cursed Lee Wulff for inventing the fishing vest for just that reason. .. . . but it *does* seem a bit odd that such a gear whore can also be a minister of the minimalist approach. ![]() -- TL, Tim ------------------------ http://css.sbcma.com/timj |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Charles wrote:
A fishing life offers all sorts of opportunities for mini-epiphanies and I've recently tripped over one that's worth mentioning. "Why do we fish?" For all of us, it's more than just catching fish, but the "catching" is always required somewhere in the mix. The social aspects plus the opportunity to innovate has always been much higher than "catching", on my priority list. As is obvious with such priorities, my "catching" suffers. Frankly, I don't put nearly as much effort into it as I should. But when I ask this hard question again, am I ordering my priorities this way because they suit me or in part because I don't want to make the effort to move beyond an average level of "catching"? In other words, am I hiding behind my priorities to save myself the bother of doing the "catching" right? Enter the minimalist angler as a highly effective angler. I've always loaded myself up with bulging vest, stuffed pockets, spare spools, spare rods in the car, all precautions against not having the right thing to satisfy picky trout. But this load of gear is really a recognition that I haven't taken the time, haven't made the effort to know what I'm doing. I have burdened myself physically with armloads of gear to avoid having to take on the mental burden of selecting just what is necessary and no more –- to avoid having to know what I'm doing. So here I am on Whitemans, wet wading, one small fly box, one spool of tippet, one rod, one reel, and thinking about what I am actually doing instead of just chucking the contents of multiple flyboxes at unimpressed fish. Before I left the house, I had decided where I would fish using the right bug for that water, time of day, and at that point in the season. Bingo, epiphany time. By forcing a minimalist approach, I have to really know what I'm doing as there's no margin for error. I've stripped away the excuses, the multiple flybox crutches, and faced the fish armed with a handful of flies and my wits. Stripped of the superfluous gear, I'm reading water, examining bugs, search bankside bushes, catching fish, and in the process, discover that there's an amazing mental clarity to the minimalist approach. Is it more fun? You betchya. When you can sit down to the vise, tie up two identical dry flies, put one on the brim of your hat and the other on the end of your tippet, then walk down to the stream at precisely the right time KNOWING that you'll catch as many fish as you care to, that's a minmalist approach. Of course, if you live right on the stream you know the flies of the season and have naturals to copy just by picking them off the screen door. It's quite a bit harder for the "weekend warrior" who has to travel to the stream. Damn, I miss Montana. -- Ken Fortenberry |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Charles wrote:
A fishing life offers all sorts of opportunities for mini-epiphanies and I've recently tripped over one that's worth mentioning. "Why do we fish?" For all of us, it's more than just catching fish, but the "catching" is always required somewhere in the mix. The social aspects plus the opportunity to innovate has always been much higher than "catching", on my priority list. As is obvious with such priorities, my "catching" suffers. Frankly, I don't put nearly as much effort into it as I should. But when I ask this hard question again, am I ordering my priorities this way because they suit me or in part because I don't want to make the effort to move beyond an average level of "catching"? In other words, am I hiding behind my priorities to save myself the bother of doing the "catching" right? Enter the minimalist angler as a highly effective angler. I've always loaded myself up with bulging vest, stuffed pockets, spare spools, spare rods in the car, all precautions against not having the right thing to satisfy picky trout. But this load of gear is really a recognition that I haven't taken the time, haven't made the effort to know what I'm doing. I have burdened myself physically with armloads of gear to avoid having to take on the mental burden of selecting just what is necessary and no more –- to avoid having to know what I'm doing. So here I am on Whitemans, wet wading, one small fly box, one spool of tippet, one rod, one reel, and thinking about what I am actually doing instead of just chucking the contents of multiple flyboxes at unimpressed fish. Before I left the house, I had decided where I would fish using the right bug for that water, time of day, and at that point in the season. Bingo, epiphany time. By forcing a minimalist approach, I have to really know what I'm doing as there's no margin for error. I've stripped away the excuses, the multiple flybox crutches, and faced the fish armed with a handful of flies and my wits. Stripped of the superfluous gear, I'm reading water, examining bugs, search bankside bushes, catching fish, and in the process, discover that there's an amazing mental clarity to the minimalist approach. Is it more fun? You betchya. When you can sit down to the vise, tie up two identical dry flies, put one on the brim of your hat and the other on the end of your tippet, then walk down to the stream at precisely the right time KNOWING that you'll catch as many fish as you care to, that's a minmalist approach. Of course, if you live right on the stream you know the flies of the season and have naturals to copy just by picking them off the screen door. It's quite a bit harder for the "weekend warrior" who has to travel to the stream. Damn, I miss Montana. -- Ken Fortenberry |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Chales wrote:snipEnter the minimalist angler as a highly effective
angler. I've always loaded myself up with bulging vest, stuffed pockets, spare spools, spare rods in the car, all precautions against not having the right thing to satisfy picky trout. I have often and for many decades thought that I should drive from Dallas to Yellowstone while carrying and fishing only soft hackle flies and each time, I just can't make myself do that. Each time I catch a nice trout on a hopper or beetle, I know I made the right decision again. I guess my balls are just too small. Most of the time the room befind the seat of the pickup is full of flyboxes. It is surprising how many flyboxes I carry on a motorcycle on those other years. Big Dale |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A fishing life offers all sorts of opportunities for mini-epiphanies
and I've recently tripped over one that's worth mentioning. Anti-epiphany - what good is it being a gear whore without being able to show everyone what a good gear whore you are by wearing a 30 lb vest? Sheesh. Some people have no respect for the rules. 'Sides, without that heavy vest, you can easily float down stream in the feeding duck position. -- Frank Reid Reverse email to reply |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A fishing life offers all sorts of opportunities for mini-epiphanies
and I've recently tripped over one that's worth mentioning. Anti-epiphany - what good is it being a gear whore without being able to show everyone what a good gear whore you are by wearing a 30 lb vest? Sheesh. Some people have no respect for the rules. 'Sides, without that heavy vest, you can easily float down stream in the feeding duck position. -- Frank Reid Reverse email to reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Life in Congo, Part V: What a (long) strange trip its being.... | riverman | Fly Fishing | 58 | September 25th, 2003 12:28 PM |
Rangers keep ATV users on road to conservation | Jim | Fly Fishing | 0 | September 23rd, 2003 07:16 AM |