A Fishing forum. FishingBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » FishingBanter forum » alt.fishing & alt.flyfishing newsgroups » Catfish Fishing
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Frog Gigging Time In Kentucky!



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 22nd, 2005, 11:27 PM
Garrison Hilliard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Frog Gigging Time In Kentucky!

Gig is up: It's frog-catching time
Kentucky hunting season allows rifles, forks

By Andrea Remke
Enquirer staff writer

ALEXANDRIA - Can you hear that?

It's the sound of one less bullfrog croaking in the night.

Kentucky bullfrog hunting season commenced on Friday, as it does each year on
the third Friday in May.

According to the Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources, frog
hunting - or gigging - involves using a multi-pronged fork affixed to a pole to
spear a bullfrog. A flashlight is pointed at the frog, to temporarily blind it
before it is captured.

To successfully catch the frogs, gigging takes place after dark in shallow,
weedy ponds or even creeks, rivers and small reservoirs.

Chet Hayes, 57, said he has been frog gigging since he was about 12. Hayes, who
lives in eastern Campbell County, said the practice can be done off a boat in a
stream or lake, where frogs feed on crayfish, small birds or other frogs.

It takes a swift hand and spear to catch one, he said.

"They are very fast - they are used to being the predator."

A fishing or hunting license is required for gigging, and a hunting license is
needed in order to shoot the frogs with a rifle, said Vikki Rawe, an aquatic
educator for the state fish and wildlife department, who is based in Alexandria.
The limit for gigging is 15 per day, she said.

Rawe's son Jesse, 16, and his friends often gig in the summer. While it may seem
like a gross practice, she said, many "critters" her son catches, such as frogs,
snakes and turtles, are used for Rawe's school presentations.

They're not bad eating either, she said.

"Everyone says it tastes like chicken, but chicken doesn't compare," she said.

Hayes agreed. "It's more of a flavorful chicken."

As for the manner in which the frog is hunted, he said it's a form of husbandry,
"the same as processing beef, chicken... or fish."

Stephanie Boyles, wildlife biologist for People for the Ethical Treatment of
Animals (PETA), based in Virginia, disagrees.

"We think it's a hideous practice," she said. "Frogs don't do any harm. It's
cruel and needless... it's got to be painful for (the frog)."

E-mail

IF YOU GIG
Statewide bullfrog season in Kentucky opened Friday and closes Oct. 31.

Bullfrogs are the only frogs in Kentucky large enough to provide ample leg meat
to eat.

Taking frogs by hand or gig requires a fishing or hunting license.

The noon-to-noon daily creel limit for bullfrogs is 15.

For information, consult the 2005 Kentucky Sport Fishing and Boating Guide or
visit the Web at fw.ky.gov.

- Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources

http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.d...99/1059/news01
  #2  
Old May 25th, 2005, 07:20 PM
CinciGreg
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

There are still frogs in Kentucky?

Compared with even a few decades ago, they seem to be pretty much
eradicated altogether. I don't mean this as a criticism of
frog-gigging, but something sure seems to have all but eliminated
frogs.

I can remember fishing and camping as a kid, and hearing the frogs
roar. The last time I camped along a creek in central KY, the the
complete absence of frog noise was startling. I remember that it was
Memorial Day weekend, and we speculated that perhaps it was still too
early in the year for the appearance of frogs. But their COMPLETE
absence was puzzling.

  #3  
Old May 26th, 2005, 04:21 AM
Rick
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article .com,
"CinciGreg" wrote:

There are still frogs in Kentucky?

Compared with even a few decades ago, they seem to be pretty much
eradicated altogether. I don't mean this as a criticism of
frog-gigging, but something sure seems to have all but eliminated
frogs.

I can remember fishing and camping as a kid, and hearing the frogs
roar. The last time I camped along a creek in central KY, the the
complete absence of frog noise was startling. I remember that it was
Memorial Day weekend, and we speculated that perhaps it was still too
early in the year for the appearance of frogs. But their COMPLETE
absence was puzzling.


The sudden, and dramatic, loss of many amphibians is fairly old news
(dates back at least 10 years).


From: http://www.nature.com/nature/links/010405/010405-1.html
"Amphibian populations have suffered widespread declines and extinctions
in recent decades. Although climatic fluctuations, increased UV-B
radiation, and increased prevalence of disease have all been implicated
at particular localities, the importance of global environmental change
remains unclear. New data links global climate change with disease
outbreaks in populations of the western toad, Bufo boreas , a species
that has experienced severe declines in recent years."

From: http://www.amphibiaweb.org/declines/declines.html
"Globally , over 200 amphibian species have experienced recent
population declines, with reports of 32 species extinctions (Blaustein
and Wake 1990, Alford and Richards 1999, Houlahan et al. 2000)."

If you look at the map on the amphibiaweb.org site, you will notice that
the Americas are particularly hard hit. I won't speculate why as, as far
as I know, nobody has yet proven a connection between human activity and
the loss of amphibians. Considering the history of same, however, one
might suspect there is a link.

Rick
  #4  
Old May 27th, 2005, 02:03 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Rick wrote:

If you look at the map on the amphibiaweb.org site, you will notice that
the Americas are particularly hard hit. I won't speculate why as, as far
as I know, nobody has yet proven a connection between human activity and
the loss of amphibians. Considering the history of same, however, one
might suspect there is a link.


Well, yeah, if you're a paranoid leftist hippy freak who's too stupid
to understand that that amphibians have been around a LONG time and
that any species fluctuation should be considered normal and expected
rather than a clarion call off doom!

  #5  
Old May 27th, 2005, 03:32 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 26 May 2005 03:21:01 GMT, Rick
wrote:

In article .com,
"CinciGreg" wrote:

There are still frogs in Kentucky?

Compared with even a few decades ago, they seem to be pretty much
eradicated altogether. I don't mean this as a criticism of
frog-gigging, but something sure seems to have all but eliminated
frogs.

I can remember fishing and camping as a kid, and hearing the frogs
roar. The last time I camped along a creek in central KY, the the
complete absence of frog noise was startling. I remember that it was
Memorial Day weekend, and we speculated that perhaps it was still too
early in the year for the appearance of frogs. But their COMPLETE
absence was puzzling.


The sudden, and dramatic, loss of many amphibians is fairly old news
(dates back at least 10 years).


From: http://www.nature.com/nature/links/010405/010405-1.html
"Amphibian populations have suffered widespread declines and extinctions
in recent decades. Although climatic fluctuations, increased UV-B
radiation, and increased prevalence of disease have all been implicated
at particular localities, the importance of global environmental change
remains unclear. New data links global climate change with disease
outbreaks in populations of the western toad, Bufo boreas , a species
that has experienced severe declines in recent years."

From: http://www.amphibiaweb.org/declines/declines.html
"Globally , over 200 amphibian species have experienced recent
population declines, with reports of 32 species extinctions (Blaustein
and Wake 1990, Alford and Richards 1999, Houlahan et al. 2000)."

If you look at the map on the amphibiaweb.org site, you will notice that
the Americas are particularly hard hit. I won't speculate why as, as far
as I know, nobody has yet proven a connection between human activity and
the loss of amphibians. Considering the history of same, however, one
might suspect there is a link.

Rick


Here in the south we blame the absence of amphibians and
almost all ground nesting birds and animals to the fire ant.
They live around the edge of almost all bodies of water here
and attack in the thousands when something crawls from the
water. Birds such as quail and meadow larks have no chance
when their babies are eaten alive by the hellish little
beasts. They have even been know to full grown cattle by
swarming their mouth and nostrils.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Time to upgrade the computer... Charles Summers Bass Fishing 0 April 28th, 2004 02:55 PM
Been a long time...(This is a novel, but I hope you enjoy it) Conlan Bass Fishing 3 December 6th, 2003 04:26 AM
First time on water in a year! Rob Storm Bass Fishing 6 November 27th, 2003 06:09 AM
Fish much smarter than we imagined John General Discussion 14 October 8th, 2003 10:39 PM
all the time Gone Angling Bass Fishing 0 October 7th, 2003 09:08 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 FishingBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.