![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() -- /* Sandy Pittendrigh --oO0 ** http://montana-riverboats.com */ Is global warming OT in this newsgroup? Maybe not. There have been a flurry of internet links, the last few days, to a series of stories about the announcement of a new global warming model that essentially concludes we've already past an unstoppable tipping point. Most of this has gone by un-noticed--admidst all the hurricane news. But it is a story that wants to make all else beside the point. Even if we were to stop pumping CO2 and other green house gases into the atmosphere now--it's already too late--according to this new model. Part of the new news is the recently noticed and supposedly unprecedented melting of the Siberian perma-frost. So much frozen Siberian methane is supposed to released into the atmosphere, according to this new argument, that there is now no stopping the melting of the polar ice caps. New York streets, this new model says, will be, like the streets of New Orleans, swamped and flooded within 50-80 years. Like a mountain snowfield in late June, most of the actual melting will happen all at once at the last minute, they say. But just like a snowfield in early April: it's just a matter of time and there's no stopping it now. Or at least so goes the argument. Just because some climate guys have a model doesn't make it true, of course. But the stakes are definitely escalating. Just a few years ago climate researchers were starting to warn that conditions seemed to be changing. Now some of them are starting to predict inescapable cataclysm. A thirty foot increase in world-wide ocean levels would--like nucular war--ruin your whole fishing day. One of the most interesting things about this debate is the right/left ideological divide. The Christian right, who tend to view the world as some sort a holy homo sapiens fish tank, created specifically for our benefit, where humans (but only humans) go to heaven for eternal paradise--get all uptight when they hear about global warming suggestions. God would never allow such a thing, they seem to think. (now this really *is* off topic now, but I do find myself wondering about it: if they do have eternal paradise in heaven, does that mean they still have sex? Can I still get laid? Well, I know I won't be going there anyway, so I guess I shouldn't worry about it. But here's another question: if you die when you're 97, do you remain 97 for eternity? Can they still eat steak? Do they have outhouses or toilets there?) Anyway, back to global warming: The ideological free market capitalists are even more threatened by any talk about global warming than the Christians. The magic of the market place suddenly doesn't look so ideologically pure anymore, not in the global warming context. In fact, when and if you ever do accept that global warming is not only happening, but largely caused by human activity, then the only logical next step is big time government intervention. So it's no wonder they don't like it all. If global warming is happening, as a consequence of humanity, then the only logical conclusion is that the human race is a worldwide pestilence. An infestation in fact. The next 10 to 20 years should be interesting. Whatever the outcome, the prognosis should be less in doubt by then. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
So You Thought Global Warming Was Bad... | George Cleveland | Fly Fishing | 2 | May 12th, 2005 12:00 AM |
Rolling Stone - Bush is worst environmental president ever | Sportsmen Against Bush | Fly Fishing | 0 | December 4th, 2003 09:02 AM |