![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://montana-riverboats.com/Pages/...nd_shrimp.html
The above is my favorite Crayfish pattern. I caught my biggest brown in long time on this fly, on the lower Madison, late last fall. After you catch the first fish, if you hold the fly underneath your net and squeeze-pump the foam body of the fly a few times, as the scent-laden fish slime runs down off the net.....then the fly suddenly becomes noticably, substantially more effective. Is that "unethical?" Why? Am I trolling this question? Maybe. But it is an interesting question. Ethical/not ethical depends on which and whose rules you play by, it seems to me. Are there any moral absolutes in the fishing business? I've published quite a few fly tying pieces in glossy magazines over the years. But I know I could never get anything about scent-laden foam Crayfish flies published. Even though they're hot as a fish catching pistol. Why not is part of my original question. Why are the concepts of odor and wiggling, lure-like flies so totally off limits in polite fly fishing society? -- /* Sandy Pittendrigh --oO0 ** http://montana-riverboats.com */ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bi-annual foam rant | [email protected] | Fly Fishing Tying | 11 | May 15th, 2005 02:57 AM |
Sonar Question | Joshuall | Bass Fishing | 7 | February 8th, 2005 11:15 AM |
Hook Removal and Foam Bugs | Gene C | Fly Fishing | 6 | November 4th, 2004 12:45 PM |
crayfish | arne koch | General Discussion | 6 | March 23rd, 2004 02:54 AM |
Tournament Question | Chuck Coger | Bass Fishing | 7 | October 1st, 2003 10:48 PM |