totally OT irrelvant inflamatory troll

I was thinking about Anita HIll and Uncle Thomas last night.
How long has it been? Six or eight years back?

Anita HIll said uncle Thomas referred to himself as
"Long Dong Silver" and made numerous sexual advances.

The issue quickly became "is his denial a lie" rather than
"did he actually do these things." This was an interesting
case because there WAS NO MIDDLE GROUND. One or
the other was clearly lying.

In the end, congress chose to believe uncle Thomas.
So how many of you now believe Anita Hill?

Is this the first time we've had a pathological liar
sitting on the supreme court.........a guy, by they way,
who never says much and hardly ever writes an opinion?

On 18 Oct 2006 10:33:19 -0700, "salmobytes"
wrote:

I was thinking about Anita HIll and Uncle Thomas last night.
How long has it been? Six or eight years back?

Anita HIll said uncle Thomas referred to himself as
"Long Dong Silver" and made numerous sexual advances.

The issue quickly became "is his denial a lie" rather than
"did he actually do these things." This was an interesting
case because there WAS NO MIDDLE GROUND. One or
the other was clearly lying.

In the end, congress chose to believe uncle Thomas.
So how many of you now believe Anita Hill?

Is this the first time we've had a pathological liar
sitting on the supreme court.........

Two words: Abe Fortas

(a supposed "liberal" put there by a Dem, LBJ)

HTH,
R

a guy, by they way,
who never says much and hardly ever writes an opinion?

"salmobytes" wrote in message
oups.com...

...In the end, congress chose to believe uncle Thomas.

Well, congress chose to ratify (or whatever the hell term they use) his
nomination to the court. It's a mistake to believe that this necessary
implies anything about belief.

So how many of you now believe Anita Hill?

Now? Why, has something new come up.....so to speak?

Is this the first time we've had a pathological liar
sitting on the supreme court.........

Is the judiciary somehow lacking in the qualities that exemplify the
legislative and the executive?

a guy, by they way, who never says much

A quality most definitely in short supply in all branches of government at
all levels.

and hardly ever writes an opinion?

Wouldn't have much to do around here, would he?

Wolfgang
anything but the facts, ma'am.

"salmobytes" wrote in
oups.com:

Is this the first time we've had a pathological liar
sitting on the supreme court........

The judiciary is not any more pure than any other branch of government.
Shortcomings found in one will be found in all. The Constitution sets out
a pretty good framework for a robust government despite our individual
shortcomings.

--
Scott
Reverse name to reply

"salmobytes" wrote

In the end, congress chose to believe uncle Thomas.
So how many of you now believe Anita Hill?

i, like wolfgang, didn't realize this chesnut had been rescued from the
flames. what up, bro?

Is this the first time we've had a pathological liar
sitting on the supreme court.........a guy, by they way,
who never says much and hardly ever writes an opinion?

no; and he doesn't say much because his hero, the great scalia, writes
the opinions and he merely concurs. gives him more time to waste.

wayno

On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:18:17 -0400, "Wayne Harrison"
wrote:


"salmobytes" wrote

In the end, congress chose to believe uncle Thomas.
So how many of you now believe Anita Hill?

i, like wolfgang, didn't realize this chesnut had been rescued from the
flames. what up, bro?

Is this the first time we've had a pathological liar
sitting on the supreme court.........a guy, by they way,
who never says much and hardly ever writes an opinion?

no; and he doesn't say much because his hero, the great scalia, writes
the opinions and he merely concurs. gives him more time to waste.

Uh-oh...breaking out the _highly_ specialized trolls, eh? Let me return
the favor:

How to you support your comment above in light of such as "Ashcroft vs.
ACLU" or "Hamdi vs. Rumsfeld?"...

There's actually some interesting stuff out there on Scalia and Thomas
and this very subject.

TC,
R

wrote:
On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:18:17 -0400, "Wayne Harrison"
wrote:


"salmobytes" wrote

In the end, congress chose to believe uncle Thomas.
So how many of you now believe Anita Hill?

i, like wolfgang, didn't realize this chesnut had been rescued from the
flames. what up, bro?

Is this the first time we've had a pathological liar
sitting on the supreme court.........a guy, by they way,
who never says much and hardly ever writes an opinion?

no; and he doesn't say much because his hero, the great scalia, writes
the opinions and he merely concurs. gives him more time to waste.

Uh-oh...breaking out the _highly_ specialized trolls, eh? Let me return
the favor:

How to you support your comment above in light of such as "Ashcroft vs.
ACLU" or "Hamdi vs. Rumsfeld?"...

There's actually some interesting stuff out there on Scalia and Thomas
and this very subject.

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Wolfgang

On 18 Oct 2006 17:52:39 -0700, "Wolfgang" wrote:


wrote:
On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:18:17 -0400, "Wayne Harrison"
wrote:


"salmobytes" wrote

In the end, congress chose to believe uncle Thomas.
So how many of you now believe Anita Hill?

i, like wolfgang, didn't realize this chesnut had been rescued from the
flames. what up, bro?

Is this the first time we've had a pathological liar
sitting on the supreme court.........a guy, by they way,
who never says much and hardly ever writes an opinion?

no; and he doesn't say much because his hero, the great scalia, writes
the opinions and he merely concurs. gives him more time to waste.

Uh-oh...breaking out the _highly_ specialized trolls, eh? Let me return
the favor:

How to you support your comment above in light of such as "Ashcroft vs.
ACLU" or "Hamdi vs. Rumsfeld?"...

There's actually some interesting stuff out there on Scalia and Thomas
and this very subject.

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Change your dress and get a new girdle...

....and order a cosmo...

Cheers,
Dickie
....hey, maybe one of them Yankee dudes will go get ya some mixer...

Hell hath no fury.....

wrote:

Change your dress and get a new girdle...

...and order a cosmo...

Cheers,
Dickie
...hey, maybe one of them Yankee dudes will go get ya some mixer...

Hey, anybody wanna see dicklet twitch? Yeah? You sure? O.k., watch:

EMERIL

OPRAH

LATIFAH

Hee, hee, hee.

Wolfgang
absinthe absinthe absinthe absinthe.....