US intellgence is a whole lot better than many of you supposed "liberals" thought...

In an amazing display of apparent ESP, it has been revealed that the US
Secret Service was "wiretapping" ("Princess") Diana both in the US and
outside of the US in the 1990s. Naturally, since Billary was in office
at the time, there is no way their administration would have been doing
such "un-Constitutional" things, and the agencies involved would have
only been doing such as that with the knowledge that the Bush
Administration would naturally want them to supposedly ignore the US
Constitution...

wrote in message
...
In an amazing display of apparent ESP, it has been revealed that the US
Secret Service was "wiretapping" ("Princess") Diana both in the US and
outside of the US in the 1990s. Naturally, since Billary was in office
at the time, there is no way their administration would have been doing
such "un-Constitutional" things, and the agencies involved would have
only been doing such as that with the knowledge that the Bush
Administration would naturally want them to supposedly ignore the US
Constitution...

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Wolfgang

Wolfgang wrote:

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

I wuz gonna say the same thing, but I didn't want to plagiarize. :-)

Joe F.

"rb608" wrote in message
oups.com...
Wolfgang wrote:

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

I wuz gonna say the same thing, but I didn't want to plagiarize. :-)

Well, to be perfectly honest about it, I was paraphrasing something I once
heard somewhere a long time ago.

Wolfgang
who has long understood and appreciated the value of reference to the
classics......and the futility and hubris of trying to improve thereon.

On 12 Dec 2006 11:09:19 -0800, "rb608" wrote:

Wolfgang wrote:

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

I wuz gonna say the same thing, but I didn't want to plagiarize. :-)

Joe F.

I grant full fair use of any of the following:

"zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz"

"ahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!"

"[..../]"

"Sometimes a nitwit is just....a nitwit"

/daytripper (no charge! ;-)

On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:35:44 -0600, wrote:

In an amazing display of apparent ESP, it has been revealed that the US
Secret Service was "wiretapping" ("Princess") Diana both in the US and
outside of the US in the 1990s. Naturally, since Billary was in office
at the time, there is no way their administration would have been doing
such "un-Constitutional" things, and the agencies involved would have
only been doing such as that with the knowledge that the Bush
Administration would naturally want them to supposedly ignore the US
Constitution...

ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/wa..._target_diana/

/daytipper (sometimes a nitwit is just....a nitwit)

"daytripper" wrote in message
...
On 12 Dec 2006 11:09:19 -0800, "rb608" wrote:

Wolfgang wrote:

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

I wuz gonna say the same thing, but I didn't want to plagiarize. :-)

Joe F.

I grant full fair use of any of the following:

"zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz"

"ahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!"

"[..../]"

"Sometimes a nitwit is just....a nitwit"

/daytripper (no charge! ;-)

Ditto:

"dumbass"

"absinthe absinthe emeril latifah absinthe oprah emeril"

"and yet, here you are"

"oprah absinthe absinthe emeril absinthe oprah latifah"

"WILL NOT learn"

"absinthe emeril oprah oprah absinthe absinthe"

"etc."

Wolfgang

"daytripper" wrote in message
...

.../daytipper (sometimes a nitwit is just....a nitwit)

"ainna?"

Wolfgang

"rb608" wrote in message
oups.com...
Wolfgang wrote:

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

I wuz gonna say the same thing, but I didn't want to plagiarize. :-)

Joe F.


Rah Dean has a point here. I mean, Hillary wouldn't want to make the same
social function faux pas as Laura Bush, showing up at the x-mass tree
lighting in the same dress as three other women. So it is only natural that
she would have the NSA keep tabs on Princess Di and any other women that she
might meet socially.

Of course, there is the fact that Hillary wears the pants in the Clinton
family; and therefore, was unlikely to show-up at any social function
wearing the same dress as an other woman at the function?

Rah Dean's statement, "the agencies involved would have only been doing such
as that with the knowledge that the Bush Administration would naturally want
them to supposedly ignore the US Constitution...," is absolutely correct and
I for one would like to commend him for finally coming to grips with the
fact, *there is no U.S. Constitution, as far as the Bush administration is
concerned*.

Op

Wolfgang wrote:
"daytripper" wrote in message
I grant full fair use of any of the following:
Ditto:

"dumbass"


I appreciate all of those; but I'm pretty sure "dumbass" was already
public domain.

Joe F.