![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I tried furled leaders years ago and decided I didn't
like them. The recent FeatherCraft catalogs have featured "Next Generation" furled leaders and Tim Holschlag at smallmouthangler.com recommends Blue Sky furled leaders so when I rigged up my 6wt for smallie fishing I put on a "Next Generation", "New and Improved" furled leader specifically designed for big bass bugs. I used the bass leader from FeatherCraft and it is an improvement over earlier versions in that it has a loop for attaching to the fly line and a small ring for tying on the tippet. I don't like loops, I much prefer a nicely tied nail knot, but they are handy and the tiny little ring is the neat idea that convinced me to give furled leaders another try. Furled leaders still suck. If you let your Sneaky Pete sit on the water for any time at all the leader sinks so that the only things floating are the fly and the end of the flyline. Lifting the fly off the water creates a huge ruckus, enough to scare off any fish for miles around. Back to good old Orvis SuperStrong tapered leaders for me. -- Ken Fortenberry |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 30, 9:05 am, Ken Fortenberry
wrote: so when I rigged up my 6wt for smallie fishing.... Furled leaders still suck....... Back to good old Orvis SuperStrong tapered leaders I never tried a furled leader. But your post does come wrapped in a big bugs for samllie context. And then ends up liking tapered leaders. So it occurred to me: tapered leaders are great, but they seldom (never yet, that I've ever seen) have enough backbone to toss bass bugs of any kind. So I either make my own leaders from scratch (most of the time) or I add a thicker, stouter leader butt to the rear end of the tapered section. Then you can cast big bugs in the wind. And the fat butt tends to sink quickly, which helps drag the whole leader under with it, so you don't get that long squiggly, fish-scaring dimple on the surface, between fly line and floating bug. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
salmobytes wrote:
On Aug 30, 9:05 am, Ken Fortenberry wrote: so when I rigged up my 6wt for smallie fishing.... Furled leaders still suck....... Back to good old Orvis SuperStrong tapered leaders I never tried a furled leader. But your post does come wrapped in a big bugs for samllie context. And then ends up liking tapered leaders. So it occurred to me: tapered leaders are great, but they seldom (never yet, that I've ever seen) have enough backbone to toss bass bugs of any kind. So I either make my own leaders from scratch (most of the time) or I add a thicker, stouter leader butt to the rear end of the tapered section. The butt end of an Orvis SuperStrong 0X 6ft. tapered leader is .023". That's enough backbone for most of the flies I toss with my 6wt. When I need to toss something huge with an 8 or 9wt rod I'll start the leader with 4 to 6 feet of 50 lb test Climax hard mono that measures .0295". If I can't cast it with that butt section it ain't gonna get cast. Then you can cast big bugs in the wind. And the fat butt tends to sink quickly, which helps drag the whole leader under with it, so you don't get that long squiggly, fish-scaring dimple on the surface, between fly line and floating bug. I've never known smallies to be leader shy. -- Ken Fortenberry |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message et... Back to good old Orvis SuperStrong tapered leaders for me. Ken Fortenberry Just curious, are the Orvis SS tapered leaders any better than the other brand tapered leaders? -tom |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Furled leaders still suck. If you let your Sneaky Pete sit on the water for any time at all the leader sinks so that the only things floating are the fly and the end of the flyline. Lifting the fly off the water creates a huge ruckus, enough to scare off any fish for miles around. I see your problem. You're using the ones made from mono. I made up a couple of them when I was first trying out furled leaders, and they weren't much of an improvement over regular mono tapered leaders. (They tended to coil up almost as much as mono, and as you noted, they don't float well.) I make mine up from Unithread (6/0 for most trout fishihg, and 8/0 if I want a really fine one). I then treat them with Mucilin before using them. The result is a truly supple leader that floats just fine and doesn't spray. And I definitely like the tippet rings. I've been using them on most of my leaders, furled or not. Having said all that, I don't think furled leaders are the be-all and end-all, but I do like the way they work for delicate presentations. (For bass fishing I usually just use a 3X tapered leader.) Back to good old Orvis SuperStrong tapered leaders for me. Personally, I like the Maxima tapered leaders. SS have too much memory. Chuck Vance |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ken Fortenberry wrote in
et: Furled leaders still suck. If you let your Sneaky Pete sit on the water for any time at all the leader sinks so that the only things floating are the fly and the end of the flyline. Lifting the fly off the water creates a huge ruckus, enough to scare off any fish for miles around. Back to good old Orvis SuperStrong tapered leaders for me. I haven't used the furled, but I have used braided. I recall more spray on the cast. I didn't hate them, but they were more expensive, and of less utility as my knots improved. -- Scott Reverse name to reply |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message et... the tiny little ring is the neat idea They are called tippet rings and are oft maligned by folks that haven't tried them G I don't care for furled leaders but I now use tippet rings on all my leaders except on a "bobber nymphing only rod" Tie a ring on the slightly cut back end of a 3 or 4x leader ( use a 100% knot -Pilsen is what I like ) and you can now attach tippet from 3X to 7X directly to that ring and have a very nice casting leader ( takes some experimenting to get lengths of tippet correct, of course ) for dries and sight/film nymphing. I have all but forgotten how to tie a surgeons knot G and I just nip the tippet off and redo when it gets short and not performing well with the fly being cast. I also just nip the tippet off at the end of a day. The ring makes finding the end of the leader on the reel the next day a piece of cake and I don't have to try and remember or mike the tippet to know what I'm fishing ... both big pluses for us seniors :-) FWIW, I have been using the rings about three seasons, well over 200 days. Cost? I usually go all season on one ring/rod unless I really **** up and snag something way out of reach. I don't lose more than a couple/ season fishing about 100days/year and they actually save ME money because I'm not replacing leaders gone bad by being cut back too far ( I am very picky about leader performance and can't stand one that has gotten out of balance from cutting back and replacing tippet ) . I don't use them on the nymphing rod simply because that technique and I tend to tangle constantly anyway, so why add mode tackle to muck with, or the cost of rings lost. I haven't bothered to post here to ROFF about how much headache the rings have removed from my fishing season for the simple reason that it was certain to cause outrage in people that "know" how stupid the rings are, without any need to actually try them G. I HAVE given a few rings away to anglers I've met, along with advice on how to use them, and in every case the recipient come back and asked where to get more. I fish mainly dry flies and "film flies" on "technical" waters ... and I get better, more consistent, presentations over the course of time with the rings than I ever did without ... mainly since the leader is consistent day to day instead of slightly changing when a tippet change alters the last section of the taper ... which makes me more consistent. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom Nakashima wrote:
"Ken Fortenberry" wrote: Back to good old Orvis SuperStrong tapered leaders for me. Just curious, are the Orvis SS tapered leaders any better than the other brand tapered leaders? I like them better than any other I've tried. If you take a micrometer to Orvis SuperStrong leaders they'll be more consistently to spec than other tapered leaders. -- Ken Fortenberry |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Conan The Librarian" wrote I make mine up from Unithread (6/0 for most trout fishihg, and 8/0 if I want a really fine one). I then treat them with Mucilin before using them. The result is a truly supple leader that floats just fine and doesn't spray. And I definitely like the tippet rings. I've been using them on most of my leaders, furled or not. I have had the pleasure of trying Vancian Leaders and they are vastly better than the Blue Sky ( whatever it is ) mono furled leaders. Personally, I like the Maxima tapered leaders. SS have too much memory. I have tried every brand and style of leader I've ever heard of over the course of years, but am very satisfied with my current rig. I am picky about leaders far beyond my concern about, say, rods or reels. I travel 1000s of miles intentionally seeking picky fish and they have convinced me that line and leader are the two key items of tackle ( assuming the angler can pick a reasonable pattern for the circumstances ). MY (never too humble ) OPINION is that the angler is best served by picking a line/leader combo that he likes and sticking with it, learning it's most intimate traits, knowing exactly what to expect form it when cast a certain way with a given fly. But, if you are bored by catching too many fish and want to make tough technical fish even more challenging, fish a different rod each day and constantly try new terminal tackle G Oh, I settled on RIO because I can find it everywhere I go and don't have to change brands. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry L wrote:
"Conan The Librarian" wrote I make mine up from Unithread (6/0 for most trout fishihg, and 8/0 if I want a really fine one). I then treat them with Mucilin before using them. The result is a truly supple leader that floats just fine and doesn't spray. I have had the pleasure of trying Vancian Leaders and they are vastly better than the Blue Sky ( whatever it is ) mono furled leaders. Oh, that's right ... I did send you a couple of those, didn't I? I think I even sent you a "camo" version, no? :-) Personally, I like the Maxima tapered leaders. SS have too much memory. [little snip] MY (never too humble ) OPINION is that the angler is best served by picking a line/leader combo that he likes and sticking with it, learning it's most intimate traits, knowing exactly what to expect form it when cast a certain way with a given fly. I definitely agree with that. I think it's a lot like fishing knots. We can argue all day about what knot tests out as closest to 100%, but the one that ultimately works best is the one you can tie *consistently* on the stream under any conditions. Similarly, the line and leader you are most familiar with and are confident in is likely to be the "best". But, if you are bored by catching too many fish and want to make tough technical fish even more challenging, fish a different rod each day and constantly try new terminal tackle G Oh, I settled on RIO because I can find it everywhere I go and don't have to change brands. Ah, but by using your tippet rings, you'd only have to buy a couple a year, whatever the brand. :-) Chuck Vance |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Furled leaders | Michael J. Moline | Fly Fishing | 1 | June 28th, 2007 02:15 PM |
Furled Leaders | Michael J. Moline | Fly Fishing | 0 | June 23rd, 2007 11:55 PM |
Furled Leaders | Michael J. Moline | Fly Fishing Tying | 0 | June 23rd, 2007 11:53 PM |
"furled" leaders | Larry L | Fly Fishing | 20 | March 2nd, 2005 02:59 AM |
DIY: Furled leaders | Conan the Librarian | Fly Fishing | 11 | September 30th, 2004 12:09 AM |