A homo at the trainstation thread for Connor

Enjoy it, Mikey. You deserve it.

d;o)

On 6 Nov, 01:57, Dave LaCourse wrote:
Enjoy it, Mikey. You deserve it.

d;o)

Well LaCourse, I can´t say that I enjoy it, but it is interesting to
see you excelling yourself again. I wonder what your friends think
about you carrying on in such a fashion? You rant on about my posting
rubbish, as you maintain, and then you start new threads on the
matter, purely for the sake of offering abuse. Don´t you find that
somewhat contradictory?

I think it unlikely that anyone will appreciate your efforts.

Your lack of principle is only exceeded by your stupidity, as it is
obvious to just about everybody in the meantime that various
references to homos and the like have absolutely no effect on me. Your
endeavours merely serve to further illustrate what you are, and quite
graphically.

Even though your nonsense is totally ineffectual, I can appreciate the
malice and desire to wound you invested in it. As doubtless others
can too. You are a disgrace LaCourse, and very very foolish as well.
every single one of your attacks merely serves to confirm my
statements on the matter, and your efforts to destroy my "reputation"
on here as you put it, which is in the meantime a matter of complete
indifference to me, merely serve to accelerate the total destruction
of your own.

Serves you right. I told you on several occasions that I felt sorry
for you, I no longer do. You deserve everything nasty that happens to
you.

MC

Also interesting to note your use of the word homo as what you
obviously conceive to be a deadly insult. Only a fairly extreme
homophobe does something like that LaCourse, and your mentor is
purportedly the sworn enemy of all homophobes. Doubtless he finds
himself in something of a dilemma as a result.

Does he do what he claims he does to all homophobes and take the
chance of losing an ally, ( who admittedly is more of a liability, but
needs must when the devil drives), or does he swallow hard, and try to
put a brave face on it?

With friends like you LaCourse, nobody needs enemies!

MC

On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 18:21:40 -0800, Mike
wrote:

Well LaCourse, I can´t say that I enjoy it,

Hey, in the States we are an equal oportunity kind of community.

No, Mike. You are the homophobe. Can't you see the irony of it all?

On 6 Nov, 03:43, Dave LaCourse wrote:
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 18:21:40 -0800, Mike
wrote:

Well LaCourse, I can´t say that I enjoy it,

Hey, in the States we are an equal oportunity kind of community.


We are not in the States LaCourse, we are in international cyberspace.
Which on the one hand is lucky for you, as you are, at least for the
moment, beyond the reach of those authorities who would otherwise
punish you for your behaviour,and on the other hand very unlucky, as
you are far too ignorant to navigate in it, indeed, you are apparently
unaware of where you actually are. If you had any sense at all, you
would long since have ceased all this nonsense. But you are in fact
criminally stupid. Setting out to damage others will eventually cause
you more damage than you can at present conceive. Indeed it already
has. It is also going quite a long way to degrading this group even
further, and it is your doing LaCourse. You could have ceased at any
time, but you just kept going on and on and on.

My patience in the pursuit of my objectives is limitless LaCourse. How
´s yours?

MC

On 6 Nov, 03:45, Dave LaCourse wrote:
No, Mike. You are the homophobe. Can't you see the irony of it all?

You don´t know what irony is LaCourse, you are merely trying some of
your mentor´s minor tactics by backpedalling and lying after you have
been exposed in another hopeless situation.

Everybody knows why you used the word homo, the sole reason was to
insult me, and the only person who would use the word as an insult is
a homophobe. Simple logic LaCourse. Inescapable inexorable, and no
irony involved.

You want to have another try dumbo?

MC

"Mike" wrote in message
oups.com...

snip
Everybody knows why you used the word homo, the sole reason was to
insult me, and the only person who would use the word as an insult is
a homophobe. Simple logic LaCourse. Inescapable inexorable, and no
irony involved.
snip
MC

Flawed logic. If someones aim is to insult another, the most effective
means is to use terms that are known to be extremely offensive to the target
of the insult. It doesn't matter whether the insulter personally finds those
terms objectionable to themselves in order to have maximum effect on the
target of the insult. Your reasoning only holds true if the insulter has no
knowledge of what the target finds offensive, and thus must rely on the
assumption that things the insulter would find offensive have the same
effect on the target. That is not the case here, as you have made it
abundantly clear how offensive you find the terms used.

Bob Weinberger

"Dave LaCourse" wrote in message
...
Enjoy it, Mikey. You deserve it.

d;o)

By god we've got a pit ad I'm going to **** in it...Why, I knew her when she
didn't have a pit to hiss in!

let'em rip let's get down to what it's all about....

I think it's time we got a little bit "Hot and Nasty!'

john

On 6 Nov, 04:41, "Bob Weinberger"
wrote:
"Mike" wrote in message

oups.com...

snip
Everybody knows why you used the word homo, the sole reason was to
insult me, and the only person who would use the word as an insult is
a homophobe. Simple logic LaCourse. Inescapable inexorable, and no
irony involved.
snip
MC

Flawed logic. If someones aim is to insult another, the most effective
means is to use terms that are known to be extremely offensive to the target
of the insult. It doesn't matter whether the insulter personally finds those
terms objectionable to themselves in order to have maximum effect on the
target of the insult. Your reasoning only holds true if the insulter has no
knowledge of what the target finds offensive, and thus must rely on the
assumption that things the insulter would find offensive have the same
effect on the target. That is not the case here, as you have made it
abundantly clear how offensive you find the terms used.

Bob Weinberger

An interesting and apparently correct analysis. But it ignores a
couple of other factors. He is simply not clever enough to go through
the logical process you have so clearly defined.

He is not capable of detecting the logic as flawed,and therefore he
believed it.

His response confirmed my analysis, which was my objective. He tried
to backpedal, he would not have done so had my analysis been
incorrect. he did so because it was correct and he felt guilty.

MC