OT Least favorite Super Bowl commercial

...though I recognize I probably
am subsidizing it through various other funding channels...

You subsidize it every time you buy an advertised product.

If you're "average," you spend hundreds of dollars a year to pay for
ads.

vince

For me it had to be Ditka in the commercial for limp dick medicine
throwing the football through the tire. PUHHHLEEEEEASE, how is THAT
bit of imagery any less offensive than Janet Jackson's tassle clad
nipple ?

--
Ken Fortenberry

From: Ken Fortenberry

For me it had to be Ditka in the commercial for limp dick medicine
throwing the football through the tire. PUHHHLEEEEEASE, how is THAT
bit of imagery any less offensive than Janet Jackson's tassle clad
nipple ?

This is scary. Twice within a week, I agree with Mr. Fortenberry.


George Adams

"All good fishermen stay young until they die, for fishing is the only dream of
youth that doth not grow stale with age."
---- J.W Muller

On Mon, 02 Feb 2004 16:54:13 GMT, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:

For me it had to be Ditka in the commercial for limp dick medicine
throwing the football through the tire. PUHHHLEEEEEASE, how is THAT
bit of imagery any less offensive than Janet Jackson's tassle clad
nipple ?

--
Ken Fortenberry



I spent the evening reading a book about Krakatoa, only watching the last
15 seconds of the game, but I've heard several references to Janet's boobs.
How much could one actually see? All of it? Part of it? If only part of it,
which part? Just curious, as I doubt if I'll see it on the local news.


g.c.

"George Cleveland" wrote in message
I spent the evening reading a book about Krakatoa, only watching the last
15 seconds of the game, but I've heard several references to Janet's
boobs.

I missed the incident as well & didn't even hear of it until this a.m. I
skipped the halftime show because, frankly, they usually suck, and the
lineup for this year had no promise to reverse that trend. Switched back
from CNN just in time for the second half kickoff. I am amazed however, the
a brief glimpse of a woman's breast can send this country into such a tizzy.
BFD if you ask me. ****, even the chairman of the FCC & the White House
felt the need to comment. Pretty f*ckin' sad state of affairs.

I liked the "Shards o' Glass" spot, though.

FWIW, the entire lineup of ads is available at
http://www.ifilm.com/?sctn=collections&pg=superbowl2004

Joe F.

"George Cleveland" wrote in message
...
How much could one actually see? All of it? Part of it? If only part of
it,
which part? Just curious, as I doubt if I'll see it on the local news.

http://www.drudgereport.com/mattjj.htm

Jeff T.

I spent the evening reading a book about Krakatoa, only watching the last
15 seconds of the game, but I've heard several references to Janet's boobs.
How much could one actually see? All of it? Part of it? If only part of it,
which part? Just curious, as I doubt if I'll see it on the local news.

The full monty can be found at http://www.drudgereport.com (with
close-ups). By the way, if you look closely (purely for sake of the
investigation), you will see that her bustier cups are attached with
snaps. The material did not accidentally rip. It was designed to tear
away.
Frank Reid

On Mon, 02 Feb 2004 12:49:42 -0500, Francis Reid wrote:

I spent the evening reading a book about Krakatoa, only watching the last
15 seconds of the game, but I've heard several references to Janet's boobs.
How much could one actually see? All of it? Part of it? If only part of it,
which part? Just curious, as I doubt if I'll see it on the local news.

The full monty can be found at http://www.drudgereport.com (with
close-ups). By the way, if you look closely (purely for sake of the
investigation), you will see that her bustier cups are attached with
snaps. The material did not accidentally rip. It was designed to tear
away.
Frank Reid


I agree with Mr. Fleishmann. Hohum. According to my kid (who just walked
in to eat lunch) it wasn't a big deal. In fact he's more ****ed at the
people who are raising the stink about it.

Thats my boy.

g.c.

"George Cleveland" wrote in message
...
I spent the evening reading a book about Krakatoa, only watching the last
15 seconds of the game, but I've heard several references to Janet's
boobs.
How much could one actually see? All of it? Part of it? If only part of
it,
which part? Just curious, as I doubt if I'll see it on the local news.

Ive seen more real tit on fellow Roffians and in the mirror.
I saw it and, sexist as it sounds, was that a tit or what? I mean it looked
about as much like a real tit as her brother's nose. My TV is pretty small
but that thing didn't look like no lady tit Ive seen lately thick or thin,
and Ive been painting nudes and doing live figure drawing sessions quite a
bit lately.

But then my personal aesthetic runs toward Rembrandt, Rubens, and Renoir
women. To me Janet looks like something out of Dr. Boygirl's chop shop. The
girl's got no hips at all. And what was that thingy on her nipple? Some sort
of metal implant or what? Poor girl.

Dave

..

"Francis Reid" wrote in message
...
I spent the evening reading a book about Krakatoa, only watching the
last
15 seconds of the game, but I've heard several references to Janet's
boobs.
How much could one actually see? All of it? Part of it? If only part of
it,
which part? Just curious, as I doubt if I'll see it on the local news.

The full monty can be found at http://www.drudgereport.com (with
close-ups). By the way, if you look closely (purely for sake of the


I was wrong.

Well I checked out the Druge site and . . . I stand corrected, that
definitly is a ladytit. Guess its time to get a bigger TV, or maybe not.

Dave