![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I fish along the south coast. I have been hearing rumours that local
councils will be bringing in licenses for fishing off the beach. Is this true? If it is, does anyone know how much these licenses will cost? Regards, SL -- N.Groups: Take word SPAM out of email to reply. FREE International Call Charges http://www.san.steve.btinternet.co.uk |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi
the councils themselves have no power to do that due to a very old law in The Magna Carta which makes sea fishing in the UK free to all. What you have probably heard is that the Government are considering overruling the law and introducing a licence that would cost approx £22 per person. For more info get the October issue of Sea Angler. Regards Luis "SL" wrote in message ... I fish along the south coast. I have been hearing rumours that local councils will be bringing in licenses for fishing off the beach. Is this true? If it is, does anyone know how much these licenses will cost? Regards, SL -- N.Groups: Take word SPAM out of email to reply. FREE International Call Charges http://www.san.steve.btinternet.co.uk |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 18:50:09 +0000 (UTC), "Luis Troyano"
wrote: Hi the councils themselves have no power to do that due to a very old law in The Magna Carta which makes sea fishing in the UK free to all. What you have probably heard is that the Government are considering overruling the law and introducing a licence that would cost approx £22 per person. For more info get the October issue of Sea Angler. Regards Luis This is just political scare mongering as the government would not be able to over rule the law. We live in the UK not some third world country. Norman |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
They are going to overrule the Lords on Fox Hunting and use a law that is
only supposed to be used in dire emergencies oops top posted! to late to delete! "Norman" wrote in message ... On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 18:50:09 +0000 (UTC), "Luis Troyano" wrote: Hi the councils themselves have no power to do that due to a very old law in The Magna Carta which makes sea fishing in the UK free to all. What you have probably heard is that the Government are considering overruling the law and introducing a licence that would cost approx £22 per person. For more info get the October issue of Sea Angler. Regards Luis This is just political scare mongering as the government would not be able to over rule the law. We live in the UK not some third world country. Norman |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 17:45:16 GMT, "Brutus Gold"
wrote: They are going to overrule the Lords on Fox Hunting and use a law that is only supposed to be used in dire emergencies oops top posted! to late to delete! "Norman" wrote in message ... On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 18:50:09 +0000 (UTC), "Luis Troyano" wrote: Hi the councils themselves have no power to do that due to a very old law in The Magna Carta which makes sea fishing in the UK free to all. What you have probably heard is that the Government are considering overruling the law and introducing a licence that would cost approx £22 What the House of Commons have voted by a clear majority vote is to ban fox hunting with dogs. If the House of Lords vote against the House of Commons ruling it would effectively undermine the decision made by Parliament. The Parliament Act you refer to is not an emergency law. Until the House of Lords was reformed recently it always had a conservative majority as the "Lords", who were not elected by the people, mostly supported the Conservative principles. There are two ways for a law to be passed by Parliament. The usual way is for the Houses of Commons and Lords to agree the same text. However, it now seems unlikely that members of the House of Lords will change their preconceived views.. The other way comes into play when the House of Lords refuses to agree with the democratically elected House of Commons. This procedure is known as the Parliament Act. It is fairly rare, but has happened twice since the 1997 General Election, The Parliament Act was passed by Parliament in 1911 and amended in 1949. It says (section 2.1) that "if any Public Bill ... is passed by the House of Commons [in two successive sessions] (whether of the same Parliament or not), and, having been sent up to the House of Lords at least one month before the end of the session, is rejected by the House of Lords in each of those sessions, that Bill shall, on its rejection by the House of Lords, unless the House of Commons vote to the contrary, be presented to Her Majesty and become an Act of Parliament on the Royal Assent being signified thereto, notwithstanding that the House of Lords have not consented to the Bill..." To introduce a licence or sea fishing tax the government/local council etc would have to go through the procedure of making legislation to make it legal. All the two million + anglers would have to do is to vote for the party that opposed this. Sea fishing has a lot more support from ordinary people which contrasts that of fox hunting which is primarily an activity rich people indulge in. Norman |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Norman
wrote: House of Lords was reformed recently it always had a conservative majority as the "Lords", who were not elected by the people, mostly supported the Conservative principles. Tony Blair has created the House of Lords that -he- wanted - and stuffed it with appointees yet still they won't pass this one. To introduce a licence or sea fishing tax the government/local council etc would have to go through the procedure of making legislation to make it legal. Yes All the two million + anglers would have to do is to vote for the party that opposed this. Hmmmm. The CA got 400K people to march in London. How many do you think would actually turn up if the NFSA asked them..? Sea fishing has a lot more support from ordinary people which contrasts that of fox hunting which is primarily an activity rich people indulge in. You're wrong there I'm afraid. A year's hunt membership costs about the same as a football season ticket. A day's wrecking costs more than a day's hunting. It's cheaper if you folllow on foot - the majority follow on foot. Of course if you want to spend more you can - just like certain angling tackle-junkies. Outside the home counties the great majority of hunters are 'working' class. (One of the checkout girls in my local supermarket for eg.) Of course the Anti's don't bother to tell you any of this. It's no secret that fishing is due for a lot more anti pressure once this one has gone through, are you ready? Cheerio, -- |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Norman
wrote: House of Lords was reformed recently it always had a conservative majority as the "Lords", who were not elected by the people, mostly supported the Conservative principles. Tony Blair has created the House of Lords that -he- wanted - and stuffed it with appointees yet still they won't pass this one. To introduce a licence or sea fishing tax the government/local council etc would have to go through the procedure of making legislation to make it legal. Yes All the two million + anglers would have to do is to vote for the party that opposed this. Hmmmm. The CA got 400K people to march in London. How many do you think would actually turn up if the NFSA asked them..? Sea fishing has a lot more support from ordinary people which contrasts that of fox hunting which is primarily an activity rich people indulge in. You're wrong there I'm afraid. A year's hunt membership costs about the same as a football season ticket. A day's wrecking costs more than a day's hunting. It's cheaper if you folllow on foot - the majority follow on foot. Of course if you want to spend more you can - just like certain angling tackle-junkies. Outside the home counties the great majority of hunters are 'working' class. (One of the checkout girls in my local supermarket for eg.) Of course the Anti's don't bother to tell you any of this. It's no secret that fishing is due for a lot more anti pressure once this one has gone through, are you ready? Cheerio, -- |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Luis Troyano
wrote: What you have probably heard is that the Government are considering overruling the law and introducing a licence that would cost approx £22 per person. It's proposed to be either a separate licence or an extension of the current national coarse fishing licence. The timing is very suspicious, this one is claimed to show that HMG 'care' for the sport and will use the revenue to improve sea angling... For the freshwater anglers they have agreed a relaxation of the rules for culling cormorants... And each announcement showing they care for angling and feel our pain is timed to co-incide with another twist on the hunting bill. Just as if they didn't want 4 million anglers to side with the hunters and shooters. Now if you -really- want New Lab to take angling seriously and be ready to make concessions turn out and support the hunters (make it clear you're an angler) - any MP with less than a vast majority is going to sweat a bit and start worrying... ....'cos there's an election due. Cheerio, -- |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Derek.Moody" wrote The timing is very suspicious, this one is claimed to show that HMG 'care' for the sport and will use the revenue to improve sea angling... Like they look after our roads with the revenue from 'road tax'......Get a life Derek, come into the real world. Brian ( against any form of sea fishing license ) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Luis Troyano
wrote: What you have probably heard is that the Government are considering overruling the law and introducing a licence that would cost approx £22 per person. It's proposed to be either a separate licence or an extension of the current national coarse fishing licence. The timing is very suspicious, this one is claimed to show that HMG 'care' for the sport and will use the revenue to improve sea angling... For the freshwater anglers they have agreed a relaxation of the rules for culling cormorants... And each announcement showing they care for angling and feel our pain is timed to co-incide with another twist on the hunting bill. Just as if they didn't want 4 million anglers to side with the hunters and shooters. Now if you -really- want New Lab to take angling seriously and be ready to make concessions turn out and support the hunters (make it clear you're an angler) - any MP with less than a vast majority is going to sweat a bit and start worrying... ....'cos there's an election due. Cheerio, -- |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
All-American Carp Fishing Forum...now a reality | PKelly | Catfish Fishing | 0 | May 8th, 2004 06:06 PM |
All-American Carp Fishing Forum...a reality at last | PKelly | General Discussion | 0 | May 8th, 2004 01:29 AM |
Volunteers Needed for VT Fishing Program | Outdoors Magazine | General Discussion | 0 | March 4th, 2004 02:58 PM |
RECIPROCAL FISHING GOES INTO EFFECT ON LAKE CHAMPLAIN | Outdoors Magazine | Fly Fishing | 0 | December 29th, 2003 03:18 PM |
RECIPROCAL FISHING GOES INTO EFFECT ON LAKE CHAMPLAIN | Outdoors Magazine | Catfish Fishing | 0 | December 29th, 2003 03:16 PM |