![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In my beginner days, every single fly tying instruction book I read (that
means both of them) had the same 'inside hint' that a hair stacker was not really necessary. One suggested an empty lipstick case, another said you could align the hairs by hand just as easily, with a bit of practice. But now that I'm getting a bit better at tying, I find aligning the hairs a RPITA! I tried a lipstick case, but when I dumped the hairs out, they all fell into disarray again. I think a hair stacker really is a good idea, but I don't know for sure because I've never really used one. This is really a weak topic for a thread, because if I just go out and buy one and then toss it later, it will represent a much smaller waste of money than most of the things I have in my tying kit. But just the same, whats the scoop....do most of you advanced tyers use a stacker, or do you do it by hand? --riverman |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
riverman wrote:
This is really a weak topic for a thread, because if I just go out and buy one and then toss it later, it will represent a much smaller waste of money than most of the things I have in my tying kit. When you get sick of it, throw it my way. I use a Griffin sometimes. Depends on the fly and the hair. I could use a large Griffin sometimes, so maybe you should try that model? grin Bottom line: some people like crew cuts, others prefer the shaggy natural look. I usually don't use a stacker except on smaller flies like size 18 ehc where uneven hairs would make it hard to get the right density (if you can see what I mean). -- Stan Gula http://gula.org/roffswaps |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: "riverman"
tried a lipstick case, but when I dumped the hairs out, they all fell into disarray again. If you "dump the hairs out", nothing will work. You need to hold them by the butts once the tips are aligned, and keep pressure on the hair until it is tied in. I suppose a lipstick container would work, (you'd have to cut it down so that the butts of shorter length hair would be exposed), but a "real" hair stacke isn't real expensive, and, in most cases will be a bit more user friendly. George Adams "All good fishermen stay young until they die, for fishing is the only dream of youth that doth not grow stale with age." ---- J.W Muller |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "George Adams" wrote in message ... From: "riverman" tried a lipstick case, but when I dumped the hairs out, they all fell into disarray again. If you "dump the hairs out", nothing will work. You need to hold them by the butts once the tips are aligned, and keep pressure on the hair until it is tied in. I suppose a lipstick container would work, (you'd have to cut it down so that the butts of shorter length hair would be exposed), but a "real" hair stacke isn't real expensive, and, in most cases will be a bit more user friendly. What I did discover with the lipstick case was that the inside bottom was not flat. (I had to use the lid, as the main body has some sort of mechanism that holds the lipstick.) But even if I used a shell casing, I found that when I put the hair in and tap it, most of it doesn't really settle down. Then I grab the bottoms to take it out, and then transfer it to my other hand by grasping the tips, and then tie it in. But in all that transfer, the hairs get a bit out of alignment again. I think a real hair stacker has some sort of 'collar' that you remove so that you can take the hairs out by the tips, is that correct? Like I said, this is sort of just mindless chatter, as I am going to buy one anyway to try it out. I didn't know they came in different sizes, tho. --rm |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"riverman" wrote in
: In my beginner days, every single fly tying instruction book I read (that means both of them) had the same 'inside hint' that a hair stacker was not really necessary. One suggested an empty lipstick case, another said you could align the hairs by hand just as easily, with a bit of practice. But now that I'm getting a bit better at tying, I find aligning the hairs a RPITA! I tried a lipstick case, but when I dumped the hairs out, they all fell into disarray again. I think a hair stacker really is a good idea, but I don't know for sure because I've never really used one. This is really a weak topic for a thread, because if I just go out and buy one and then toss it later, it will represent a much smaller waste of money than most of the things I have in my tying kit. But just the same, whats the scoop....do most of you advanced tyers use a stacker, or do you do it by hand? --riverman One production commercial tier I know uses a .45 shell casing. I use the renzetti, but I never use the small end of it. Scott |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
riverman wrote:
snip But just the same, whats the scoop....do most of you advanced tyers use a stacker, or do you do it by hand? I'm by no means an advanced tyer, but I took my tying gear on a fishing trip this past year intending to tie up some comparaduns. I had everything I needed *except* a hair stacker which I'd left at home under a stack of clutter. I may as well have left the whole kit & caboodle at home because without the hair stacker there was not an ice cubes chance in Hades that I could tie a comparadun. Admittedly, I have more thumbs than fingers, but for me a hair stacker is an essential item. -- Ken Fortenberry |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "riverman" wrote Get one, things like Sparkle duns are SO much easier to tie nicely with evenly stacked hair ( I often don't stack for downwing caddis type flies, they look better ragged ) I have one with two sized tubes, for big and small amounts of hair ... works just fine ... I never use the bigger tube oh, and, yes, get a hair comb too ..... I laughed and scoffed at these UNTIL I tried one, greatly improves any hair fly to have all the scruff removed and a fine toothed comb is far more efficient than anything else I've heard of |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() oh, and, yes, get a hair comb too ..... I laughed and scoffed at these UNTIL I tried one, greatly improves any hair fly to have all the scruff removed and a fine toothed comb is far more efficient than anything else I've heard of Seconded. A hair stacker, (I use the large one 'cause its easier to stuff the **** in there) and a decent mustache brush. Mine is brass for fly tying. Gets rid of all that underfur. I tie alot with deer hair. Deer hair flies and flies that just use a bit of deer hair. Stacked tips or butts, it doesn't matter. A hair stacker is the right tool for the job. Hell, want one? I'll send you one for Xmas. Send me your addy. Bass Pro is just around the corner. -- Frank Reid Reverse email to reply |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Frank Reid" moc.deepselbac@diersicnarf wrote in message ... oh, and, yes, get a hair comb too ..... I laughed and scoffed at these UNTIL I tried one, greatly improves any hair fly to have all the scruff removed and a fine toothed comb is far more efficient than anything else I've heard of Seconded. A hair stacker, (I use the large one 'cause its easier to stuff the **** in there) and a decent mustache brush. Mine is brass for fly tying. Gets rid of all that underfur. I tie alot with deer hair. Deer hair flies and flies that just use a bit of deer hair. Stacked tips or butts, it doesn't matter. A hair stacker is the right tool for the job. Hell, want one? I'll send you one for Xmas. Send me your addy. Bass Pro is just around the corner. :-) Thanks for the christmas offer, Frank! I know you're good for it, but getting it to me through the mail would probably not be worth it. I have a fly-tying shopping list a few inches long (hooks, thread, beads, etc), so I'll add the hair stacker on it and do a shop in Johannesburg when I go for christmas break. SWMBO and I are starting out with a week of flyfishing at some trout fishing venue in South Africa (www.kingfishertrout.co.za) then headed off overland to Victoria Falls region and southern Zambia in a rental 4x4 with full-on safari camping gear (http://www.bushlore.com/Campers.asp). Should be an exciting vacation, and I hope to be able to cast to some TigerFish in the Zambezi, some lake species in the Okavango, and of course, some trout in South Africa. Look for a TR when I get back. --riverman |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 5 Dec 2004 10:32:10 +0100, "riverman" wrote:
SWMBO and I are starting out with a week of flyfishing at some trout fishing venue in South Africa (www.kingfishertrout.co.za) then headed off overland to Victoria Falls region and southern Zambia in a rental 4x4 with full-on safari camping gear (http://www.bushlore.com/Campers.asp). Should be an exciting vacation, and I hope to be able to cast to some TigerFish in the Zambezi, some lake species in the Okavango, and of course, some trout in South Africa. Look for a TR when I get back. Looks like fun Myron. That's the kind of thing my trailer was really made for. g -- Charlie... http://www.chocphoto.com/ - photo galleries http://www.chocphoto.com/roff |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Palmering | riverman | Fly Fishing Tying | 47 | October 20th, 2004 08:36 PM |
Calf tail wings | Buxc | Fly Fishing Tying | 27 | July 13th, 2004 06:46 PM |
Size 16 Elk Hair Caddis ??? | Hooked | Fly Fishing Tying | 26 | June 2nd, 2004 03:18 PM |
? materials swap for muskox hair | charles eaton | Fly Fishing Tying | 0 | November 23rd, 2003 08:26 PM |
caddis hackle question | no | Fly Fishing | 11 | September 23rd, 2003 02:35 PM |