A Fishing forum. FishingBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » FishingBanter forum » rec.outdoors.fishing newsgroups » Bass Fishing
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

rod "modules " question



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 4th, 2004, 01:38 PM
kenneth blevins
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default rod "modules " question

what is the significance or importance in graphite
'modules" count ? Does the higher count mean that the rod is more brittle
and fast.Is the higher count better? .In the last 4 yrs I've bought 30
rods or more searching for the right feel and have got to admit that the
best rods that I've found where so far are the higher end rod .The last 3
rods I've bought were GLommis and I find that I use them more
often,although I do have a Cabalas " fish eagle II " M 7ft that I really
use alot.I guess my next step in a rod is to buy a custom made rod and
compare it to what I've already got.
Thanks
Ken Blevins


  #2  
Old February 5th, 2004, 01:53 AM
\The Shadow\
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default rod "modules " question

Ken, the term you refer to is "modulus" not to be correcting you at all. You
are correct to think that the higher the modulus of the graphite weave the
more brittle
it becomes. Also the higher the modulus becomes the "more" sensitive the
blank becomes. In the Loomis brand the IMX (Slate) series is the highest
that a rod builder can get. There are some blanks from other manufacturers
that rate as high as these but don't cost as much. Some of Allstars blanks
are very good, and my personal fav. are the Rainshadow IM7 Blanks. Contact
some builders and ask what they use for blanks. If they are stuck on only on
brand they aren't doing their homework. JMHO!

--
Dave Norton
"The Shadow"
Millennium Rods
"kenneth blevins" wrote in message
...
what is the significance or importance in graphite
'modules" count ? Does the higher count mean that the rod is more brittle
and fast.Is the higher count better? .In the last 4 yrs I've bought 30
rods or more searching for the right feel and have got to admit that the
best rods that I've found where so far are the higher end rod .The last 3
rods I've bought were GLommis and I find that I use them more
often,although I do have a Cabalas " fish eagle II " M 7ft that I really
use alot.I guess my next step in a rod is to buy a custom made rod and
compare it to what I've already got.
Thanks
Ken Blevins




  #3  
Old February 5th, 2004, 12:52 PM
BassAngler
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default rod "modules " question

Dave wrote: "You are correct to think that the higher the modulus of the
graphite weave the more brittle it becomes."

Now Dave, is that correct with Today's materials?

--
Craig Baugher



  #4  
Old February 5th, 2004, 01:21 PM
\The Shadow\
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default rod "modules " question

Let me put it this way, blank manufacturers have many options today as to
the material used in a blank.

As I stated in a recent article, many blanks are a combination of the
various moduli o. This is why we are now seeing blanks with a higher
modulus rating that can withstand the rigors that average anglers put them
through.

But still, if a blank is built with primarily a 65 million modulus weave
graphite to a) maintain thin walls, while reducing the overall weight . and
b) to increase the sensitivity of the blank. Then yes that blank will be
more susceptible to failure.

As yet I have not seen or heard of any new "miracle"
material, which will give the manufacturers the high modulus ratings they
seek, and still provide the strength
necessary to hold up to the average angler. Quite honestly I do not believe
that the everyday angler has need for these rods. Course that is just MHO,
and we all know the adage concerning opinions o



--
"The Shadow"
Millennium Rods
"BassAngler" wrote in message
...
Dave wrote: "You are correct to think that the higher the modulus of the
graphite weave the more brittle it becomes."

Now Dave, is that correct with Today's materials?

--
Craig Baugher





  #5  
Old February 5th, 2004, 06:22 PM
Calif Bill
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default rod "modules " question


""The Shadow"" wrote in message
...
Let me put it this way, blank manufacturers have many options today as to
the material used in a blank.

As I stated in a recent article, many blanks are a combination of the
various moduli o. This is why we are now seeing blanks with a higher
modulus rating that can withstand the rigors that average anglers put them
through.

But still, if a blank is built with primarily a 65 million modulus weave
graphite to a) maintain thin walls, while reducing the overall weight .

and
b) to increase the sensitivity of the blank. Then yes that blank will be
more susceptible to failure.

As yet I have not seen or heard of any new "miracle"
material, which will give the manufacturers the high modulus ratings they
seek, and still provide the strength
necessary to hold up to the average angler. Quite honestly I do not

believe
that the everyday angler has need for these rods. Course that is just MHO,
and we all know the adage concerning opinions o



--
"The Shadow"
Millennium Rods
"BassAngler" wrote in message
...
Dave wrote: "You are correct to think that the higher the modulus of the
graphite weave the more brittle it becomes."

Now Dave, is that correct with Today's materials?

--
Craig Baugher






Boron rods were the most sensitive. Can not remember who built them, but
the lightest, most sensitive and most fragile rods ever built. One of the
sal****er graphite rod makers are (GUSA I think) advertises a helix wound
rod, that supposed to be much less fragile as it does not collapse to an
oval under heavy load. The design of rods with modern fibers is still in
it's youth.
bill


  #6  
Old February 5th, 2004, 08:14 PM
\The Shadow\
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default rod "modules " question

Bill, do not be misled by slick advertising. As of today there is "No" epoxy
system that can hold up to a 100% boron rod. Boron is sometimes used in
conjunction with other materials , but not as a stand alone material for rod
blank design.

The method normally used by the best manufacturers is to sandwich 1 layer of
Boron material between several layers of graphite and fiberglass scrim. At
best you achieve a 12%to17% amount of Boron material. The reason for this is
that as I said there is no epoxy system toady that will not degrade when
applied to a !00% Boron material. What happens is delamination of the blank,
and performance is ruined. That is why there are no 100% Boron rod blanks on
the market.


--
"The Shadow"
Millennium Rods
"Calif Bill" wrote in message
ink.net...

""The Shadow"" wrote in message
...
Let me put it this way, blank manufacturers have many options today as

to
the material used in a blank.

As I stated in a recent article, many blanks are a combination of the
various moduli o. This is why we are now seeing blanks with a higher
modulus rating that can withstand the rigors that average anglers put

them
through.

But still, if a blank is built with primarily a 65 million modulus weave
graphite to a) maintain thin walls, while reducing the overall weight .

and
b) to increase the sensitivity of the blank. Then yes that blank will be
more susceptible to failure.

As yet I have not seen or heard of any new "miracle"
material, which will give the manufacturers the high modulus ratings

they
seek, and still provide the strength
necessary to hold up to the average angler. Quite honestly I do not

believe
that the everyday angler has need for these rods. Course that is just

MHO,
and we all know the adage concerning opinions o



--
"The Shadow"
Millennium Rods
"BassAngler" wrote in message
...
Dave wrote: "You are correct to think that the higher the modulus of

the
graphite weave the more brittle it becomes."

Now Dave, is that correct with Today's materials?

--
Craig Baugher






Boron rods were the most sensitive. Can not remember who built them, but
the lightest, most sensitive and most fragile rods ever built. One of the
sal****er graphite rod makers are (GUSA I think) advertises a helix wound
rod, that supposed to be much less fragile as it does not collapse to an
oval under heavy load. The design of rods with modern fibers is still in
it's youth.
bill




  #7  
Old February 5th, 2004, 08:18 PM
\The Shadow\
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default rod "modules " question

Check out this url for a description of Graphite USA rods. And
prices...........and you all think custom builders charge to much...yeesh!

http://www.charkbait.com/cs/csrodsGraphiteUSA.htm

--
"The Shadow"
Millennium Rods
"Calif Bill" wrote in message
ink.net...

""The Shadow"" wrote in message
...
Let me put it this way, blank manufacturers have many options today as

to
the material used in a blank.

As I stated in a recent article, many blanks are a combination of the
various moduli o. This is why we are now seeing blanks with a higher
modulus rating that can withstand the rigors that average anglers put

them
through.

But still, if a blank is built with primarily a 65 million modulus weave
graphite to a) maintain thin walls, while reducing the overall weight .

and
b) to increase the sensitivity of the blank. Then yes that blank will be
more susceptible to failure.

As yet I have not seen or heard of any new "miracle"
material, which will give the manufacturers the high modulus ratings

they
seek, and still provide the strength
necessary to hold up to the average angler. Quite honestly I do not

believe
that the everyday angler has need for these rods. Course that is just

MHO,
and we all know the adage concerning opinions o



--
"The Shadow"
Millennium Rods
"BassAngler" wrote in message
...
Dave wrote: "You are correct to think that the higher the modulus of

the
graphite weave the more brittle it becomes."

Now Dave, is that correct with Today's materials?

--
Craig Baugher






Boron rods were the most sensitive. Can not remember who built them, but
the lightest, most sensitive and most fragile rods ever built. One of the
sal****er graphite rod makers are (GUSA I think) advertises a helix wound
rod, that supposed to be much less fragile as it does not collapse to an
oval under heavy load. The design of rods with modern fibers is still in
it's youth.
bill




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
electric motor question...>> Marty S. General Discussion 7 June 26th, 2004 01:12 AM
anchor question...>>> Marty S. General Discussion 45 June 23rd, 2004 04:16 PM
question re Hummingbird Tri Beam luv2bafield Bass Fishing 6 January 9th, 2004 01:43 PM
Hook Set on Top Waters - and a Question at the end. Bob La Londe Bass Fishing 4 October 22nd, 2003 12:49 AM
Tournament Question Chuck Coger Bass Fishing 7 October 1st, 2003 10:48 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 FishingBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.