![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Howdy,
I've been tying all sorts of things for my NC trip, and in the process of doing various Wulff ties, I noticed that I always seem to have one problem. To wit, when I wrap the hackle from behind the wing to in front, it always splays forward and winds up crowding the eye. I build up the area in front of the wing, so there's a gentle slope (or "ramp" as I believe Harry Mason calls it), but that doesn't seem to help. I've tried tying the hackle in both ways (i.e., shiny side facing the shank and dull side facing the shank), but it seems that the last move of the hackle around the wing always screws up the position of the hackle and causes it to splay. I can usually salvage things by holding the stray fibers back before the next wrap, but I'm guessing I must be missing something obvious. Any ideas of what I might be doing wrong or helpful hints from you more experienced tiers (tyers ... tires ... tyres)? Chuck Vance (and while I've got your attention, how many wraps do you try to get in front of and behind the wings?) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Conan The Librarian" wrote Any ideas of what I might be doing wrong or helpful hints from you more experienced tiers (tyers ... tires ... tyres)? one of my fondest daydreams .... right there with winning the lottery .... is being able to tie a decent #20 Royal Wulff .... hell, I'd settle for an #18 and $20 scratcher |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Conan The Librarian wrote: I've tried tying the hackle in both ways (i.e., shiny side facing the shank and dull side facing the shank), but it seems that the last move of the hackle around the wing always screws up the position of the hackle and causes it to splay. I can usually salvage things by holding the stray fibers back before the next wrap, but I'm guessing I must be missing something obvious. Any ideas of what I might be doing wrong or helpful hints from you more experienced tiers (tyers ... tires ... tyres)? Chuck Vance (and while I've got your attention, how many wraps do you try to get in front of and behind the wings?) If Harry Mason or AK Best chime in, disregard what I say ![]() Are you using the right sized hackle for the hook? I don't use a guage anymore, I just check that the fiber length is the same size as the hook gape. Anyway for what it is worth, on a wulff or humpy type tie, I moved the calf tail back so it is a little more than 1/3 shank length distance to the hook eye. I tie in both a brown hackle and a grizzly hackle infront of the herl, wrap each fiber tightly twice behind the calf tail and three times in front, as tight and as close to the calf tail as possible. Sometimes I use a small hackle guard behind the eye to keep me from getting too close the eye. Good luck. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wayne Knight wrote:
If Harry Mason or AK Best chime in, disregard what I say ![]() That reminds me, where has AK been, anyway? ;-) Are you using the right sized hackle for the hook? I don't use a guage anymore, I just check that the fiber length is the same size as the hook gape. I was about to answer that I am using the right hackle size, until I saw the phrase "same size as the hook gape". I thought it was supposed to be between 1 and 1-1/2 times the gape (i.e., more than the gape so that the fly sits on the hackle rather than the hook). Anyway for what it is worth, on a wulff or humpy type tie, I moved the calf tail back so it is a little more than 1/3 shank length distance to the hook eye. I tie in both a brown hackle and a grizzly hackle infront of the herl, wrap each fiber tightly twice behind the calf tail and three times in front, as tight and as close to the calf tail as possible. Sometimes I use a small hackle guard behind the eye to keep me from getting too close the eye. Do you use a manufactured guard or a bit of a drinking straw or some other homemade guard? I've been playing around with homemade things, but find that I'm just as well off just using my third hand to hold the fibers back. ;-) I do like your suggestion of moving the wing. I've even been playing around with tying Wulffs on 2X long dry hooks (TMC 5212?). To my eye the proportions still look OK, but I guess the fish will be the final arbiters of that. :-} Thanks for your help. I was starting to think that either it was a dumb question and no-one else on ROFF(T) has problems tying Wulffs, or *everyone* has problems and no-one had any answers. :-) Chuck Vance |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Conan The Librarian wrote: I was about to answer that I am using the right hackle size, until I saw the phrase "same size as the hook gape". I thought it was supposed to be between 1 and 1-1/2 times the gape (i.e., more than the gape so that the fly sits on the hackle rather than the hook It's probably *supposed* to be the ration you mention, on flies with long tails, I prefer to keep the hackle the size of the gape. Which puts it on the smaller end of the spectrum. Do you use a manufactured guard or a bit of a drinking straw or some other homemade guard? I've been playing around with homemade things, but find that I'm just as well off just using my third hand to hold the fibers back. ;-) I use something I picked up a few years ago, it's metal with a slotted round and slightly conical head. I looked online in a few places for a picture but did not find one. I've also used a hair stacker in a pinch, I tend to carry my wraps out too far and the guard keeps me honest. I do like your suggestion of moving the wing. I've even been playing around with tying Wulffs on 2X long dry hooks (TMC 5212?). To my eye the proportions still look OK, but I guess the fish will be the final arbiters of that. :-} I tie almost all of my dry flies on 2x long hooks, Otherwise I'd really be screwed Thanks for your help. I was starting to think that either it was a dumb question and no-one else on ROFF(T) has problems tying Wulffs, or *everyone* has problems and no-one had any answers. :-) I think of those who responded, Mr. Collin probably has the best experience. The last fly swap I entered, I had to tie almost 60 to get 24 to send. ![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wayne Knight wrote:
Conan The Librarian wrote: snip Do you use a manufactured guard or a bit of a drinking straw or some other homemade guard? I've been playing around with homemade things, but find that I'm just as well off just using my third hand to hold the fibers back. ;-) I use something I picked up a few years ago, it's metal with a slotted round and slightly conical head. I looked online in a few places for a picture but did not find one. When I started tying a few years ago, I would find those in almost every fly shop. I think I picked up a set (for different sized hooks) from Walt at http://ezflyfish.com, but now I can't find them at all. A very handy tool when you're crowding the eye. -- TL, Tim ------------------------ http://css.sbcma.com/timj |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tim J. wrote:
When I started tying a few years ago, I would find those in almost every fly shop. I think I picked up a set (for different sized hooks) from Walt at http://ezflyfish.com, but now I can't find them at all. A very handy tool when you're crowding the eye. Are you talking about the Thompson hackle guard: http://www.dhthompson.com/tools.php I've got one of those somewhere in my stack of stuff. I bought it thinking I'd use it all the time, and promptly stuck it in one of my tying materials bins, never to be seen again. :-} Chuck Vance (who tends to grab a length of plastic straw when he gets desperate) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Something about the hackle proportions: If you want to emulate the Wulff's,
as tied(tyed) by Lee Wulff and Dan Bailey, then the hackle will be 1-1/2 to 2 times the gap. or roughly the length of the shank from the eye to the bend. I'm fairly sure that Lee Wulff used the Mustad 9671 (2xl) for his Wulffs. Of course maybe he did that because he was tying without a vise. Personally, I don't like the idea of a gentle sloping bed of wraps in front of the wing. The hackle will follow that slope which will angle the barbs forward. Build up a dam immediately against the front of the wing. Encircle the individual wings to stand them up. Then lay a smooth layer of thread in front of the wing as a base. That way, when you wrap the hackle, the barbs will stand straighter then with a sloped underbody. Allan |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Conan The Librarian wrote:
Howdy, I've been tying all sorts of things for my NC trip, and in the process of doing various Wulff ties, I noticed that I always seem to have one problem. To wit, when I wrap the hackle from behind the wing to in front, it always splays forward and winds up crowding the eye. I build up the area in front of the wing, so there's a gentle slope (or "ramp" as I believe Harry Mason calls it), but that doesn't seem to help. I've tried tying the hackle in both ways (i.e., shiny side facing the shank and dull side facing the shank), but it seems that the last move of the hackle around the wing always screws up the position of the hackle and causes it to splay. I can usually salvage things by holding the stray fibers back before the next wrap, but I'm guessing I must be missing something obvious. Any ideas of what I might be doing wrong or helpful hints from you more experienced tiers (tyers ... tires ... tyres)? Chuck Vance (and while I've got your attention, how many wraps do you try to get in front of and behind the wings?) Actually, the way you are tying them will always result in a crowded eye. When tying any dry fly, the surface over which the hackle is wound must be as cylindrical as you can make it. The hackle will always point at a right angle to the surface it is wound on. When you cut off the extra calf tail, make it rather squarish right near the eye. By tying off the hackle at the head, you will build up the head sufficiently. Also, I tie hairwings so that the butts point rearward, giving a much smaller shank near the eye. Hope this helps. peter Collin |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter A. Collin wrote:
Actually, the way you are tying them will always result in a crowded eye. When tying any dry fly, the surface over which the hackle is wound must be as cylindrical as you can make it. The hackle will always point at a right angle to the surface it is wound on. When you cut off the extra calf tail, make it rather squarish right near the eye. By tying off the hackle at the head, you will build up the head sufficiently. I'm not sure I'm understanding you correctly here. You say that I should make the calf-tail cut "squarish right near the eye". But I tie on the calftail with the butts pointed towards the hook bend, so there isn't anything to cut off near the eye. And every instruction I've ever read (or at least Harry's :-) says to make angled cuts, never square ones. As far as making a cylindrical surface for the hackle to rest on, that's basically what I'm trying to do with the "ramp" I describe. But I don't see how you can make a cylinder that runs all the way to the hook eye and matches the size of the buildup behind the wings. Seems like the thread would just slide right off the eye. :-) Or are you saying that you tie the wing-butts off in front, so you already have a buildup there? Thanks for your suggestions. Chuck Vance |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Dallas Tx, Fly Fishers Auction April 23rd | No left turn | Fly Fishing | 0 | April 22nd, 2005 12:16 AM |
Possible helpful hint on tying bullethead style flies | Conan The Librarian | Fly Fishing | 0 | April 27th, 2004 02:33 PM |
Possible helpful hint on tying bullethead style flies | Conan The Librarian | Fly Fishing Tying | 0 | April 27th, 2004 02:33 PM |
Tying (tieing?) Flies in Connecticut. | Steve C. | Fly Fishing | 0 | April 10th, 2004 01:13 PM |
FS my collection of fly tying books | Jack-of-the-Dust | Fly Fishing Tying | 0 | April 8th, 2004 10:19 PM |