A Fishing forum. FishingBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » FishingBanter forum » rec.outdoors.fishing newsgroups » Fly Fishing
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Made In USA



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 10th, 2005, 07:30 PM
news.cup.hp.com
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Made In USA


This past year, all my Weinbrenner wading boots (with and without studs)
finally gave out, so I've been looking for new boots. Problem is, I'm
hearing from fly shop owners and others that many of the boot brands are now
made over-seas, and the quality has dropped.

In the bigger scheme of things, it seems that more and more fly fishing
items have been caught up in the whole out-sourcing over-seas make-it-cheap
craze. Even warranty policies are being weakened to compensate for the
increasing number of defects and returns in fly fishing products.

What the heck is happening? Are fly fishers representative of and
encouraging the out-sourcing make-it-cheap craze, or are fly fishers in a
position to push back.

At this point, I'm placing an online order for some US Made Weinbrenner's:

http://www.wadingshoes.com/introduction/index.html

Thomas Gilg


  #2  
Old May 10th, 2005, 07:48 PM
Peter A. Collin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

news.cup.hp.com wrote:

This past year, all my Weinbrenner wading boots (with and without studs)
finally gave out, so I've been looking for new boots. Problem is, I'm
hearing from fly shop owners and others that many of the boot brands are now
made over-seas, and the quality has dropped.

In the bigger scheme of things, it seems that more and more fly fishing
items have been caught up in the whole out-sourcing over-seas make-it-cheap
craze. Even warranty policies are being weakened to compensate for the
increasing number of defects and returns in fly fishing products.

What the heck is happening? Are fly fishers representative of and
encouraging the out-sourcing make-it-cheap craze, or are fly fishers in a
position to push back.

At this point, I'm placing an online order for some US Made Weinbrenner's:

http://www.wadingshoes.com/introduction/index.html

Thomas Gilg


Another reason to fish bamboo....
  #3  
Old May 10th, 2005, 07:55 PM
Scott Seidman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"news.cup.hp.com" wrote in
:


This past year, all my Weinbrenner wading boots (with and without
studs) finally gave out, so I've been looking for new boots. Problem
is, I'm hearing from fly shop owners and others that many of the boot
brands are now made over-seas, and the quality has dropped.

In the bigger scheme of things, it seems that more and more fly
fishing items have been caught up in the whole out-sourcing over-seas
make-it-cheap craze. Even warranty policies are being weakened to
compensate for the increasing number of defects and returns in fly
fishing products.

What the heck is happening? Are fly fishers representative of and
encouraging the out-sourcing make-it-cheap craze, or are fly fishers
in a position to push back.

At this point, I'm placing an online order for some US Made
Weinbrenner's:

http://www.wadingshoes.com/introduction/index.html

Thomas Gilg



There are still plenty of quality producers of fly fishing gear. I think
the problem with boots is that they're big and bulky and expensive to
stock and inventory, so fly shops pick their two or three favorite
brands, and stick with them. Most shops I've dealt with seem to stock
Simms. I don't know what country they are made in, but I haven't heard
of any quality complaints about Simms boots.

For boots, though, I'm pretty fussy, so I like dealing with LL Bean. You
don't like it, you send it back, even after using it a few times, no
questions. I haven't taken them up on that policy, but I have sent back
boots when I didn't like the fit.

Scott
  #4  
Old May 11th, 2005, 02:45 AM
George Cleveland
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 10 May 2005 18:55:31 GMT, Scott Seidman
wrote:

"news.cup.hp.com" wrote in
:


This past year, all my Weinbrenner wading boots (with and without
studs) finally gave out, so I've been looking for new boots. Problem
is, I'm hearing from fly shop owners and others that many of the boot
brands are now made over-seas, and the quality has dropped.

In the bigger scheme of things, it seems that more and more fly
fishing items have been caught up in the whole out-sourcing over-seas
make-it-cheap craze. Even warranty policies are being weakened to
compensate for the increasing number of defects and returns in fly
fishing products.

What the heck is happening? Are fly fishers representative of and
encouraging the out-sourcing make-it-cheap craze, or are fly fishers
in a position to push back.

At this point, I'm placing an online order for some US Made
Weinbrenner's:

http://www.wadingshoes.com/introduction/index.html

Thomas Gilg



There are still plenty of quality producers of fly fishing gear. I think
the problem with boots is that they're big and bulky and expensive to
stock and inventory, so fly shops pick their two or three favorite
brands, and stick with them. Most shops I've dealt with seem to stock
Simms. I don't know what country they are made in, but I haven't heard
of any quality complaints about Simms boots.

For boots, though, I'm pretty fussy, so I like dealing with LL Bean. You
don't like it, you send it back, even after using it a few times, no
questions. I haven't taken them up on that policy, but I have sent back
boots when I didn't like the fit.

Scott



If I'm not mistaken Weinbrenner is the last U.S. manufacturer of mass
market wading boots. (There are probably small, custom makers, but
looking at a couple catalogs reveals that Simms, L.L. Bean, Patagonia,
Korkers and Chotas are all imported.) The factory is three blocks from
my house. I doubt if they'll be there much longer. The Chinese work
cheap. The Koreans and Taiwanese aren't quite as cheap but their
quality control has improved drastically. I just got back from a
AFL-CIO training seminar. While they still suggest that a person "Buy
American" they feel that it is more realistic to put increased
emphasis on expanding union activities in developing nations. If the
corporations have to meet minimum decent standards for the workers and
the environment (which will of course increase their costs) they may
have fewer incentives to move overseas.

g.c.
  #5  
Old May 11th, 2005, 02:17 PM
Wolfgang
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"George Cleveland" wrote in message
...
...I just got back from a
AFL-CIO training seminar. While they still suggest that a person "Buy
American" they feel that it is more realistic to put increased
emphasis on expanding union activities in developing nations. If the
corporations have to meet minimum decent standards for the workers and
the environment (which will of course increase their costs) they may
have fewer incentives to move overseas.



It's tough to decide whether that's a pitifully lame strategy or a
pathetically transparent admission of impotence. Either way, Hoffa must be
spinning in his foundation.

Wolfgang
who remembers a time when a union could be something other than just another
"not for profit" corporation.


  #6  
Old May 11th, 2005, 06:46 PM
George Cleveland
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 11 May 2005 08:17:37 -0500, "Wolfgang"
wrote:


"George Cleveland" wrote in message
.. .
...I just got back from a
AFL-CIO training seminar. While they still suggest that a person "Buy
American" they feel that it is more realistic to put increased
emphasis on expanding union activities in developing nations. If the
corporations have to meet minimum decent standards for the workers and
the environment (which will of course increase their costs) they may
have fewer incentives to move overseas.



It's tough to decide whether that's a pitifully lame strategy or a
pathetically transparent admission of impotence. Either way, Hoffa must be
spinning in his foundation.

Wolfgang
who remembers a time when a union could be something other than just another
"not for profit" corporation.



While I'm sure its not seen by them as a "pathetically transparent
admission of impotence" it does mean that they have come to the
conclusion that globalization is not going to be stopped by Buy
American ad campaigns. One of the examples they used was of the "Look
for the Union Label" campaign of the ladies garment workers from a
couple of decades ago. It turned out, as should be no surprise, that
most people looked for the price label instead. It might be nice if
Buy American campaigns worked but the objective reality is that they
don't. So what does Labor (capital L) do? The stratedgy of reaching
out to other Labor organizations in other countries seems to be a
reasonable effort. After all, after China, the U.S. is probably the
least Labor (there's that capital L again) friendly country in the
industrialized world. If you buy a KPOS fly reel it most probably was
made in a Unionized shop and the Unions in Korea have real respect and
power (they were deeply involved in overthrowing the late
dictatorship). I think it is a hopeful trend, this recognition that
workers of all countries have much in common. During one of the breaks
I asked (with a smile on my face) whether this means that I should
renew my IWW (Industrial Workers of the World, ie. Wobblies)
membership. The speaker thought I was joking. I wasn't.


g.c.
  #7  
Old May 11th, 2005, 07:19 PM
Wolfgang
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"George Cleveland" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 May 2005 08:17:37 -0500, "Wolfgang"
wrote:


"George Cleveland" wrote in message
. ..
...I just got back from a
AFL-CIO training seminar. While they still suggest that a person "Buy
American" they feel that it is more realistic to put increased
emphasis on expanding union activities in developing nations. If the
corporations have to meet minimum decent standards for the workers and
the environment (which will of course increase their costs) they may
have fewer incentives to move overseas.



It's tough to decide whether that's a pitifully lame strategy or a
pathetically transparent admission of impotence. Either way, Hoffa must
be
spinning in his foundation.

Wolfgang
who remembers a time when a union could be something other than just
another
"not for profit" corporation.



While I'm sure its not seen by them as a "pathetically transparent
admission of impotence" it does mean that they have come to the
conclusion that globalization is not going to be stopped by Buy
American ad campaigns. One of the examples they used was of the "Look
for the Union Label" campaign of the ladies garment workers from a
couple of decades ago. It turned out, as should be no surprise, that
most people looked for the price label instead. It might be nice if
Buy American campaigns worked but the objective reality is that they
don't. So what does Labor (capital L) do? The stratedgy of reaching
out to other Labor organizations in other countries seems to be a
reasonable effort. After all, after China, the U.S. is probably the
least Labor (there's that capital L again) friendly country in the
industrialized world. If you buy a KPOS fly reel it most probably was
made in a Unionized shop and the Unions in Korea have real respect and
power (they were deeply involved in overthrowing the late
dictatorship). I think it is a hopeful trend, this recognition that
workers of all countries have much in common. During one of the breaks
I asked (with a smile on my face) whether this means that I should
renew my IWW (Industrial Workers of the World, ie. Wobblies)
membership. The speaker thought I was joking. I wasn't.


Labor's notion that unionization in the rest of the world, with it's
concomittent increase in the cost of goods, might prove a boon to the
American work force isn't necessarily a bad idea. However, the AFL-CIO is a
rapidly diminshing force even in American politics; the only thing that
saves their implicit suggestion that they are serving their membership by
promulgating this idea from being sheer hubris is that it helps to maintain
the illusion that their primary interests are the same as those of their
constituents. Moreover, unionization (wherever and whenever it has
occurred....even as far back as medieval trade guilds) has typically
accomplished as much for the employers who tried to stamp it out (stopping
at nothing, including mass murder.....and often with cheerful assistance of
local and state law enforcement....not to mention the United States Army) as
it has for workers, by being a positive force in the development of
increased efficiency and quality through various means. Unionize China and
it becomes an even more threatening competitor in the long run. On the
other hand, if Chinese labor doesn't become organized China becomes a more
threatening economic competitor in the long run anyway.

Wolfgang
the 20th was "The American Century".....this one most certainly won't be.


  #8  
Old May 12th, 2005, 03:20 AM
Mark
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Wolfgang wrote:


It's tough to decide whether that's a pitifully lame strategy or a
pathetically transparent admission of impotence. Either way, Hoffa must be
spinning in his foundation.


I heard on NPR today that the AFL-CIO is planning to downsize its
organization in order to send money back to the locals for recruiting
purposes.
  #9  
Old August 7th, 2005, 07:10 PM
gary
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Right on, there George, but our standard of living will decrease as others
countries increase. In a hundred years or so maybe the whole world will be
on an even playing field. Trouble is the US will have exported all our
manufacturing expertise, and never will be able to compete again.


"George Cleveland" wrote in message
...
On 10 May 2005 18:55:31 GMT, Scott Seidman
wrote:

"news.cup.hp.com" wrote in
:


This past year, all my Weinbrenner wading boots (with and without
studs) finally gave out, so I've been looking for new boots. Problem
is, I'm hearing from fly shop owners and others that many of the boot
brands are now made over-seas, and the quality has dropped.

In the bigger scheme of things, it seems that more and more fly
fishing items have been caught up in the whole out-sourcing over-seas
make-it-cheap craze. Even warranty policies are being weakened to
compensate for the increasing number of defects and returns in fly
fishing products.

What the heck is happening? Are fly fishers representative of and
encouraging the out-sourcing make-it-cheap craze, or are fly fishers
in a position to push back.

At this point, I'm placing an online order for some US Made
Weinbrenner's:

http://www.wadingshoes.com/introduction/index.html

Thomas Gilg



There are still plenty of quality producers of fly fishing gear. I think
the problem with boots is that they're big and bulky and expensive to
stock and inventory, so fly shops pick their two or three favorite
brands, and stick with them. Most shops I've dealt with seem to stock
Simms. I don't know what country they are made in, but I haven't heard
of any quality complaints about Simms boots.

For boots, though, I'm pretty fussy, so I like dealing with LL Bean. You
don't like it, you send it back, even after using it a few times, no
questions. I haven't taken them up on that policy, but I have sent back
boots when I didn't like the fit.

Scott



If I'm not mistaken Weinbrenner is the last U.S. manufacturer of mass
market wading boots. (There are probably small, custom makers, but
looking at a couple catalogs reveals that Simms, L.L. Bean, Patagonia,
Korkers and Chotas are all imported.) The factory is three blocks from
my house. I doubt if they'll be there much longer. The Chinese work
cheap. The Koreans and Taiwanese aren't quite as cheap but their
quality control has improved drastically. I just got back from a
AFL-CIO training seminar. While they still suggest that a person "Buy
American" they feel that it is more realistic to put increased
emphasis on expanding union activities in developing nations. If the
corporations have to meet minimum decent standards for the workers and
the environment (which will of course increase their costs) they may
have fewer incentives to move overseas.

g.c.



  #10  
Old August 8th, 2005, 05:00 AM
Karl S
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

gary wrote:
Right on, there George, but our standard of living will decrease as others
countries increase. In a hundred years or so maybe the whole world will be
on an even playing field. Trouble is the US will have exported all our
manufacturing expertise, and never will be able to compete again.


"George Cleveland" wrote in message
...

On 10 May 2005 18:55:31 GMT, Scott Seidman
wrote:


"news.cup.hp.com" wrote in
:


This past year, all my Weinbrenner wading boots (with and without
studs) finally gave out, so I've been looking for new boots. Problem
is, I'm hearing from fly shop owners and others that many of the boot
brands are now made over-seas, and the quality has dropped.

In the bigger scheme of things, it seems that more and more fly
fishing items have been caught up in the whole out-sourcing over-seas
make-it-cheap craze. Even warranty policies are being weakened to
compensate for the increasing number of defects and returns in fly
fishing products.

What the heck is happening? Are fly fishers representative of and
encouraging the out-sourcing make-it-cheap craze, or are fly fishers
in a position to push back.

At this point, I'm placing an online order for some US Made
Weinbrenner's:

http://www.wadingshoes.com/introduction/index.html

Thomas Gilg



There are still plenty of quality producers of fly fishing gear. I think
the problem with boots is that they're big and bulky and expensive to
stock and inventory, so fly shops pick their two or three favorite
brands, and stick with them. Most shops I've dealt with seem to stock
Simms. I don't know what country they are made in, but I haven't heard
of any quality complaints about Simms boots.

For boots, though, I'm pretty fussy, so I like dealing with LL Bean. You
don't like it, you send it back, even after using it a few times, no
questions. I haven't taken them up on that policy, but I have sent back
boots when I didn't like the fit.

Scott



If I'm not mistaken Weinbrenner is the last U.S. manufacturer of mass
market wading boots. (There are probably small, custom makers, but
looking at a couple catalogs reveals that Simms, L.L. Bean, Patagonia,
Korkers and Chotas are all imported.) The factory is three blocks from
my house. I doubt if they'll be there much longer. The Chinese work
cheap. The Koreans and Taiwanese aren't quite as cheap but their
quality control has improved drastically. I just got back from a
AFL-CIO training seminar. While they still suggest that a person "Buy
American" they feel that it is more realistic to put increased
emphasis on expanding union activities in developing nations. If the
corporations have to meet minimum decent standards for the workers and
the environment (which will of course increase their costs) they may
have fewer incentives to move overseas.

g.c.




All around, one of the more irritating things in life. I had a heck of a
time finding a pair of "athletic" shoes made in America. Everything
everywhere is made in China these days. Buy a new computer, stereo, or a
pair of work pants lately? China thanks you. Go to the grocery store,
the frozen green beans come from France, the asparagus is from Peru, you
want canned corned beef? It's from Argentina or Brazil. We grow apples
in this region using cheap hispanic migrant laborers of questionable
legality, and the apples in the store are from Australia. I hope
somebody can figure that out, 'cause it's 'way beyond me.
Sorry about the rant.

Karl S.
"Treecatcher"
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Reels "Made In U.S.A." IMKen Bass Fishing 9 May 15th, 2004 02:51 AM
Propane Bottles Blues? Blue Rhino OPD "TS2" refills made easy! Save money and time! JeffF Marketplace 0 April 7th, 2004 05:35 PM
Abu Garcia made in Korea AJH Bass Fishing 1 January 26th, 2004 03:56 AM
I've made $9,200 with this idea, YOU CAN TOO! You'd be stupid nottoo! I made $9,000 so far sitting on my ass! Saltwater Fishing 0 January 21st, 2004 01:16 PM
Are there any american made tackle out there? MSNIJ123 Bass Fishing 24 January 21st, 2004 03:56 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 FishingBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.