Fly photo reference

http://www.umpqua.com/cgi-bin/flies....tion=showIndex

TL
MC

"Mike Connor" wrote ...
http://www.umpqua.com/cgi-bin/flies....tion=showIndex

TL
MC

Friend of mine gave me this in book form -- with pictures and recipes. Very
nice gift last year.

Dan

Friend of mine gave me this in book form -- with pictures and recipes. Very
nice gift last year.

Dan

Thanks for the useful reference Sir. It made wading through the hip
deep mire of ideological advocacy and hate mongering almost worth it.
:-)

David Napierkowski

David wrote:
Friend of mine gave me this in book form -- with pictures and recipes. Very
nice gift last year.

Thanks for the useful reference Sir. It made wading through the hip
deep mire of ideological advocacy and hate mongering almost worth it.
:-)

This was also posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly.tying

That newsgroup has very little, if any, of the conversations
you're whining about. It's like roff for wussies. You could
have subscribed to rofft, read the useful reference, removed
roff from the crossposting in your reply and posted your
first sentence only to rofft. But instead you decided to post
to roff.

Good luck with that.

--
Ken Fortenberry

Ken Fortenberry wrote:
David wrote:
Friend of mine gave me this in book form -- with pictures and recipes. Very
nice gift last year.

Thanks for the useful reference Sir. It made wading through the hip
deep mire of ideological advocacy and hate mongering almost worth it.
:-)

This was also posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly.tying

That newsgroup has very little, if any, of the conversations
you're whining about. It's like roff for wussies. You could
have subscribed to rofft, read the useful reference, removed
roff from the crossposting in your reply and posted your
first sentence only to rofft. But instead you decided to post
to roff.

Good luck with that.

--
Ken Fortenberry

Thanks so much for that. You have simply illustrated my point had I
cared to include non sequitors (from) such as your kind self. Also the
*net Gestapo* critique as to what groups I should read and to which I
should post was also rather typical.

David Napierkowski
All typos are the responsibility of
my spell check program.

David wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
... You could
have subscribed to rofft, read the useful reference, removed
roff from the crossposting in your reply and posted your
first sentence only to rofft. But instead you decided to post
to roff.

Good luck with that.

Thanks so much for that. You have simply illustrated my point had I
cared to include non sequitors (from) such as your kind self. Also the
*net Gestapo* critique as to what groups I should read and to which I
should post was also rather typical.

David Napierkowski
All typos are the responsibility of
my spell check program.

Apparently your spell check program;
a) doesn't know the difference between could and should
b) doesn't know how to spell non sequitur
c) doesn't have a ****ing clue what non sequitur means

And your Gestapo reference is as stupid as it is offensive.

Now go eat **** and die, you addlebrained ****wit.

--
Ken Fortenberry