![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Alaskan420" wrote in
news:AaEcg.4432$ei2.3394@trndny02: Scott, It appears to me that your arguement against such a newsgroup has become a political one. My understanding it that this process is supposed to revolve around anticipated useage and viability. You may have a point, (I do not agree), but this arguement does not belong here. Of course it belongs here. It's an RFD, you opened discussion, and I'm discussing it. I don't I've given my reason why I think the proposed group belongs in rec.sports and not rec.outdoors. There's a decision-making process, and if the powers that be don't believe my arguments are relevant, they will ignore them. I'd propose opening it up to the rest of the rec.outdoors hierarchy. Keep in mind that I fish and enjoy tournaments, but not bass tournaments. I don't consider any of my tournament experiences to be among the most conservation oriented of my pasttimes, and I think that there should be a larger conservation component for memebers of the rec.outdoors hierarchy. I have zero problems with rec.sports.anything in this case. -- Scott Reverse name to reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|