![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
June 2, 2006
Editorial An Idea Worth Throwing Back After a yearlong experiment with rainbow trout, researchers at the University of Missouri have announced that feeding them creatine — the body-building supplement Mark McGwire made infamous — can improve their fighting ability. Actually, these experiments demonstrate that trout eating a 5 percent creatine diet can swim against the current far longer than fish that aren't taking the supplement. No one has tested these creatine rainbows against an actual angler. But that has not prevented the researchers from leaping to an economic conclusion. "Fishermen probably would pay a premium for a chance of catching fish that fought longer and harder," one of them said. Probably. But also probably not. A trout that is being fed creatine is being fed by humans. The ones at the University of Missouri were tested in double-walled plexiglass tubes. The ones that anglers are likely to hook would be living in ponds, where their diets could be supplemented with creatine. They would be hatchery fish. And that's where the irony of a study like this becomes apparent. If you've ever caught a wild rainbow trout — truly wild, like those in the Delaware or the Madison River — you know that it doesn't need any help from creatine. A hatchery trout is a different creature entirely — a wan spirit reared in concrete tanks, fed trout pellets, and dumped into a foreign world on opening day. Creatine might make a difference to these fish and the anglers who catch them, but it's the wrong difference, especially since the F.D.A. hasn't approved creatine as a food additive. Anglers don't need creatine-enhanced hatchery trout. What we need are more wild trout in more wild rivers. Copyright 2006 The New York Times Company |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you've ever caught a wild rainbow trout - truly wild, like those in
the Delaware or the Madison River - you know that it doesn't need any help from creatine. A hatchery trout is a different creature entirely - a wan spirit reared in concrete tanks, fed trout pellets, and dumped into a foreign world on opening day. Creatine might make a difference to these fish and the anglers who catch them, but it's the wrong difference, especially since the F.D.A. hasn't approved creatine as a food additive. Anglers don't need creatine-enhanced hatchery trout. What we need are more wild trout in more wild rivers. Hatchery trout, as endorsed by Barry Bonds, the official food of professional baseball. Frank Reid |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
June 2, 2006 Editorial An Idea Worth Throwing Back OK, that makes up for them not getting it on Iraq's fictitious WMDs. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
rw wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote: June 2, 2006 Editorial An Idea Worth Throwing Back OK, that makes up for them not getting it on Iraq's fictitious WMDs. Heh. But they did end up firing the bitch. -- Ken Fortenberry |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2 articles: NY Times / Delaware River | tonyritter | Fly Fishing | 4 | September 20th, 2004 07:37 PM |
LA Times article | Jason | General Discussion | 7 | August 26th, 2004 02:41 PM |
Article in the LA Times | Jason | Bass Fishing | 15 | August 25th, 2004 07:25 PM |
LA Times article | Jason | Saltwater Fishing | 0 | August 24th, 2004 06:34 PM |
=NT Times / Upper Delaware River= | InfoAge | Fly Fishing | 0 | June 25th, 2004 02:18 PM |