![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:40:17 -0000, "Pat Gardiner"
wrote: Pat's Note: As I suddenly seem to be able to post here without having to shout above a baying mob of paid "farming" lobbyists drowning me out, let's try my normal more moderate and balanced tone. We know these statistics are not too reliable for the reasons admitted, and indeed we should ask that if now "our figures are now in line with other developed countries." exactly what was going on here before, that was not happening elsewhere. Accepting that the accuracy of the figures was pretty haphazard and is thought to be getting better, the key date for the explosion of superbugs including C. diff seems to be 2001. We know superbugs are created by the use of antibiotics and that there are three significant sectors of use: human health, pet health and livestock health. There is nothing that I know of to produce a sudden explosion of superbugs in human or pet health. There may or may not have been changes in procedures, but there is no reason to think this could produce more than a steady increase. The hospitals did not suddenly get more dirty, the patients did not get sicker or more numerous. If anything, use of antibiotics in people and possibly pets was being more carefully controlled. The problem was anticipated and action was being taken. That leaves animal health, especially pigs and poultry. We KNOW thanks to PETA's probing that more antibiotics were being used in less pigs. Being PETA they naturally ascribed it to being a result of illegal use as growth promoters, when the reality was they were being used legally to try to keep sick animals alive. It has got to be the attempts to handle PMWS - Circovirus - PCVAD or any of the other hundred identities of the new emerging pig diseases all of which seem related. Allowing for the propensity of veterinarians worldwide to argue without referees and publish conflicting material, the dates are exactly right for the PMWS epidemic that swept East Anglia in 1999 and that mutation being rexported worldwide in live pig exports. The point is that the pigs are still sick, and now obviously sick with MRSA too. There is no point in cleaning up the hospitals and driving an overstretched health service to the limits whilst allowing disease back in with every routine patient and every visitor. The British government has to test the pigs now and release any information on poultry too. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7268578.stm Dramatic rise in C. diff deaths Tackling hospital infections is a top government priority The number of deaths linked to hospital bug Clostridium difficile has soared in England and Wales, figures from the Office of National Statistics show. Between 2005 and 2006 the number of death certificates which mentioned the infection rose by 72% to 6,480, most of which were elderly people. In over half of cases, it was listed as the underlying cause of death. It is thought that some of the increase may be due to more complete reporting on death certificates. Deaths involving C. difficile increased by 77% in men, and 66% in women between 2005 and 2006. Since 2006 we have taken significant steps to tackle infections Professor Brian Duerden, Department of Health Rates in both sexes have gone up dramatically since 2001, when there were only 1,200 mentions of the infection on death certificates. The ONS figures also showed deaths involving MRSA remained roughly the same between 2005 and 2006 - at around 1,650. C. difficile usually affects the elderly, and can prove fatal if antibiotic treatment fails to kill all the spores in the gut, and they take hold again before the patient's own gut bacteria have had chance to mount a resistance. It is also very difficult to eradicate from the ward environment, which means it is easy for other patients to become infected. Better reporting Professor Brian Duerden, chief microbiologist at the Department of Health, said in July 2005 they called for more accurate reporting of infections such as MRSA and C. difficile on death certificates. "These statistics from 2006 show that this move has worked and our figures are now in line with other developed countries. "Since 2006 we have taken significant steps to tackle infections. "These include stringent hand-washing guidance for the NHS, a bare below the elbows dress code, putting matrons back in charge of cleanliness on their wards and an ongoing deep clean of every ward." And he added hospital infection rates were now falling. The Health Protection Agency reported in November 2007 that rates of C. difficile infection may be levelling off with the number of new cases down 7% to 13,660, while MRSA cases are falling. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Figures | go-bassn | Bass Fishing | 10 | November 26th, 2004 02:36 PM |