![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:51:01 -0000, "Pat Gardiner"
wrote: Pat's Note: The one thing you can be sure of is that you will never get the truth out of Defra's vets. They are crooks. Which is exactly why Britain has had such terrible animal health problems for the past 15 years. The orders to keep this secret must have come from the top, which tells the government where they have to start the investigations and the sackings. If they didn't know already, that is. Open government? It is a bad joke once Britain's corrupt government vets get involved. It will be MRSA in Britain's pigs and their deliberate failure to test for it and the export of vast numbers of live animals, carrying disease, with false health certificates that will eventually finish them. When the Waugh incident gets reinvestigated, farmers will learn for sure what many have suspected: Waugh was not the index case for FMD2001. The SVS (now renamed Animal health - AH) also have let diseased livestock into Britain. http://www.farmersguardian.com/story...torycode=16684 Defra bluetongue error angers farmers News | 28 February, 2008 By Alistair Driver DEFRA has admitted it culled the wrong animal after bluetongue was found in an imported cow on a farm near Middlesbrough, in December. The mistake resulted in the infected animal remaining on the farm, in the village of Great Ayton, until mid-January, which, had it not been the midge free season, could have had serious consequences for local farmers. However, Defra chose not to make the error public until contacted by Farmers Guardian this week. The infected animal originated from within a Protection Zone in Lower Saxony, Germany, and was detected in mid-December through routine post-import testing. A cow Animal Health (AH) officials believed to be the infected animal was culled 'as it potentially provides a source of infection for the local midge population, and therefore other animals', Defra said at the time. But when officials returned for routine re-testing of the herd on January 21, it was discovered that the infected animal was still present in the herd. The infected animal was then immediately culled and compensation was offered for the animal that was erroneously culled, which the farmer has accepted. The rest of the herd has been tested twice and all animals have been found to be negative. A Defra spokeswoman said the mistake was due to an 'administrative error in recording identification numbers' on the farm by Animal Health officials, compounded by a failure to carry out the proper checks later by officials at AH 'headquarters'. She admitted it was 'lucky' that the error occurred in the vector free period but said she was not aware of any action being taken to stop it happening again. "Basically the wrong animal was culled. It is unfortunate that it happened but it has not happened since," she said. Local farmers have been angered by the incident and have questioned why it was not made public. One, who asked not to be named, said farmers were 'incredulous' that it could have happened and that the local response ranged from 'fury' to 'laughter' at Defra's incompetence. David Hugill, until recently the chairman of North Riding and Durham NFU, said: "If this had happened during the peak midge season this could have had devastating consequences in an area where there is a high concentration of dairy farms," he said. He said local farmers were 'disappointed' at the 'secrecy' surrounding the incident from the start. He said farmers only heard of the initial case via the local media and were not told officially of its location. They only got to know the location and of the subsequent identification error 'unofficially' through the farmer himself. "That created a lot of bad feeling. Many farmers just see this as 'typical Defra'," he said. The incident was discussed with the industry bluetongue stakeholder group but Defra decided not make it public knowledge. The Defra spokeswoman denied there had been an attempt to cover it up. "It is just not the kind of thing we would routinely announce," she said. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bluetongue and probiotics | Curtain Cider | UK Coarse Fishing | 0 | March 6th, 2008 08:59 AM |
Bluetongue - NI Minister praised | Curtain Cider | UK Coarse Fishing | 0 | March 6th, 2008 08:59 AM |
Bluetongue - Ireland | Curtain Cider | UK Coarse Fishing | 0 | March 6th, 2008 08:59 AM |