![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hmm.......... seems I am no closer to understanding what makes you
people tick than I ever was. The fact that you support such extremely dishonourable conduct is quite astonishing. I simply fail to comprehend how that can be. I donīt suppose it is of any really earth shattering consequence though. Mike Connor http://www.mike1.bplaced.net/Wikka/HomePage http://www.mike1.bplaced.net/Wikka/ROFF |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 7, 9:54*pm, wrote:
Hmm.......... seems I am no closer to understanding what makes you people tick than I ever was. The fact that you support such extremely dishonourable conduct is quite astonishing. *I simply fail to comprehend how that can be. Dishonorable conduct? You have a beef with certain posters so you decide to innudate us with multiple posts that say the same thing, most of it gibberish and you want to talk about dishonorable conduct. Your behavior these past few days borders on some the most infantile crap most of us have ever seen from a reputed adult. But at the end of the day, we can no more control Ken than we can control you. We operate in a free environment and those of us in America, at least, value our freedoms, one of which is the freedom of speech. The Ken and you got into offer remarks you made about Gays in Europe does not make things dishonorable here. Your comments, however they were intended, came across as homophobic and Ken never has been afraid to express his opinion and you played right into it. Personally I think most of the problems result from cultural differences that most of us have not experienced nor we have any comprehension of it. Much the same way you played into with Gehrke or any other numerous other spats over the years. Hell, I remember you called me ":stupid" for disagreeing with one of your fishing assertions once. Before you call me a liar, remember there is a large archive of posts on google. Ken plays you like a fiddle and you walk right into it. What I do or don't do has nothing to do with it. You own your website and the content, you don't own ROFF nor do you own ROFFT. And you know darn well you are pushing if not exceeding the boundaries of the terms of participation for most internet isps and websites over some perceived slight. As others have said, you take this stuff way too seriously. Your fly fishing jones goes beyond what most of us here think as normal, but at the same time the olympics will soon be upon us with people that did nothing but practice their sports for years for this chance to participate. When you';re as serious as you are about something, it becomes hard to see the forest for the trees and to bring the level you are imparting to the level of the person you are consulting. Your fly line splicing is a perfect example. Most of us don't need to playing with heads to fish the waters we fish over here. Maybe how and where you fish it is important, and good for you that you can do it. That I don't doesn't mean anything more than I don't make and use shooting heads. Regardless of what you think of Ken. I consider him a friend, I may not agree with him on his opinions or how he presents his arguments, all the time but last I checked agreeing with someone all the time was not a requirement to be a friend. So I'll add my name to the list that asks you to chill. Honor comes in many forms and doing dishonorable things as revenge on something you think is dishonorable does not justify it. You know it. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() On 7-Aug-2008, Wayne Knight wrote: Dishonorable conduct? You have a beef with certain posters so you decide to innudate us with multiple posts that say the same thing, most of it gibberish and you want to talk about dishonorable conduct. Your behavior these past few days borders on some the most infantile crap most of us have ever seen from a reputed adult. But at the end of the day, we can no more control Ken than we can control you. We operate in a free environment and those of us in America, at least, value our freedoms, one of which is the freedom of speech. The Ken and you got into offer remarks you made about Gays in Europe does not make things dishonorable here. Your comments, however they were intended, came across as homophobic and Ken never has been afraid to express his opinion and you played right into it. Personally I think most of the problems result from cultural differences that most of us have not experienced nor we have any comprehension of it. Much the same way you played into with Gehrke or any other numerous other spats over the years. Hell, I remember you called me ":stupid" for disagreeing with one of your fishing assertions once. Before you call me a liar, remember there is a large archive of posts on google. Ken plays you like a fiddle and you walk right into it. What I do or don't do has nothing to do with it. You own your website and the content, you don't own ROFF nor do you own ROFFT. And you know darn well you are pushing if not exceeding the boundaries of the terms of participation for most internet isps and websites over some perceived slight. As others have said, you take this stuff way too seriously. Your fly fishing jones goes beyond what most of us here think as normal, but at the same time the olympics will soon be upon us with people that did nothing but practice their sports for years for this chance to participate. When you';re as serious as you are about something, it becomes hard to see the forest for the trees and to bring the level you are imparting to the level of the person you are consulting. Your fly line splicing is a perfect example. Most of us don't need to playing with heads to fish the waters we fish over here. Maybe how and where you fish it is important, and good for you that you can do it. That I don't doesn't mean anything more than I don't make and use shooting heads. A rational appeal Will it work? I hope so but I think not There's a line from a song "one step over the line" I think that we already are miles from that. I hope that I am wrong. Fred |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 8, 7:52*am, "Fred" wrote:
On *7-Aug-2008, Wayne Knight wrote: Dishonorable conduct? You have a beef with certain posters so you decide to innudate us with multiple posts that say the same thing, most of it gibberish and you want to talk about dishonorable conduct. Your behavior these past few days borders on some the most infantile crap most of us have ever seen from a reputed adult. But at the end of the day, we can no more control Ken than we can control you. We operate in a free environment and those of us in America, at least, value our freedoms, one of which is the freedom of speech. The Ken and you got into offer remarks you made about Gays in Europe does not make things dishonorable here. Your comments, however they were intended, came across as homophobic and Ken never has been afraid to express his opinion and you played right into it. Personally I think most of the problems result from cultural differences that most of us have not experienced nor we have any comprehension of it. Much the same way you played into with Gehrke or any other numerous other spats over the years. Hell, I remember you called me ":stupid" for disagreeing with one of your fishing assertions once. Before you call me a liar, remember there is a large archive of posts on google. Ken plays you like a fiddle and you walk right into it. What I do or don't do has nothing to do with it. You own your website and the content, you don't own ROFF nor do you own ROFFT. And you know darn well you are pushing if not exceeding the boundaries of the terms of participation for most internet isps and websites over some perceived slight. As others have said, you take this stuff way too seriously. Your fly fishing jones goes beyond what most of us here think as normal, but at the same time the olympics will soon be upon us with people that did nothing but practice their sports for years for this chance to participate. When you';re as serious as you are about something, it becomes hard to see the forest for the trees and to bring the level you are imparting to the level of the person you are consulting. Your fly line splicing is a perfect example. Most of us don't need to playing with heads to fish the waters we fish over here. Maybe how and where you fish it is important, and good for you that you can do it. That I don't doesn't mean anything more than I don't make and use shooting heads. A rational appeal Will it work? I hope so but I think not There's a line from a song "one step over the line" I think that we already are miles from that. I hope that I am wrong. Fred It had worked Fred, reagrdless of what you think or believe, my apology was sincere, and I had simply left. But that mother****er Forteneberry simply started again. he is a lying dishonourable piece of stinking ****e, and I am going to keep on telling everybody that for as long as I have the wherewithal to do so. As I told you before, iof you donīt like it, then **** off. Mike Connor |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 9, 4:41*am, Dave LaCourse wrote:
On Fri, 8 Aug 2008 19:33:43 -0700 (PDT), wrote: It had worked Fred, reagrdless of what you think or believe, my apology was sincere, and I had simply left. But that mother****er Forteneberry simply started again. Go back, Mike, and read the posts. *Fortenberry said nothing about your apology. *Others did and you went off your rocker again. *It was only then that Fortenberry came aboard. *Fortenberry did not start this latest brouhaha. Dave I thought you had noticed by now that I had ceased replying to your rubbish? Not because I think you are evil or a piece of disgusting lying ****e like your mate Fortenberry, but because I think you are just too ****ing stupid to waste any time on. Everything you post merely serves to confirm my analysis. **** off LaCourse, I donīt give a **** what you think or write. Mike Connor |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 8, 5:07*am, Wayne Knight wrote:
On Aug 7, 9:54*pm, wrote: Hmm.......... seems I am no closer to understanding what makes you people tick than I ever was. The fact that you support such extremely dishonourable conduct is quite astonishing. *I simply fail to comprehend how that can be. Dishonorable conduct? You have a beef with certain posters so you decide to innudate us with multiple posts that say the same thing, most of it gibberish and you want to talk about dishonorable conduct. Your behavior these past few days borders on some the most infantile crap most of us have ever seen from a reputed adult. But at the end of the day, we can no more control Ken than we can control you. We operate in a free environment and those of us in America, at least, value our freedoms, one of which is the freedom of speech. The Ken and you got into offer remarks you made about Gays in Europe does not make things dishonorable here. Your comments, however they were intended, came across as homophobic and Ken never has been afraid to express his opinion and you played right into it. Personally I think most of the problems result from cultural differences that most of us have not experienced nor we have any comprehension of it. Much the same way you played into with Gehrke or any other numerous other spats over the years. Hell, I remember you called me ":stupid" for disagreeing with one of your fishing assertions once. Before you call me a liar, remember there is a large archive of posts on google. Ken plays you like a fiddle and you walk right into it. What I do or don't do has nothing to do with it. You own your website and the content, you don't own ROFF nor do you own ROFFT. And you know darn well you are pushing if not exceeding the boundaries of the terms of participation for most internet isps and websites over some perceived slight. As others have said, you take this stuff way too seriously. Your fly fishing jones goes beyond what most of us here think as normal, but at the same time the olympics will soon be upon us with people that did nothing but practice their sports for years for this chance to participate. When you';re as serious as you are about something, it becomes hard to see the forest for the trees and to bring the level you are imparting to the level of the person you are consulting. Your fly line splicing is a perfect example. Most of us don't need to playing with heads to fish the waters we fish over here. Maybe how and where you fish it is important, and good for you that you can do it. That I don't doesn't mean anything more than I don't make and use shooting heads. Regardless of what you think of Ken. I consider him a friend, I may not agree with him on his opinions or how he presents his arguments, all the time but last I checked agreeing with someone all the time was not a requirement to be a friend. So I'll add my name to the list that asks you to chill. Honor comes in many forms and doing dishonorable things as revenge on something you think is dishonorable does not justify it. You know it. A very rational and sensible post, which I read several times and digested thoroughly. It is truly a pity that you have no influence on your sick ****bag mother****er of a friend. Why donīt you write him a similar epistle on the virtues of honour and common sense? If i thought that what I did was dishonourable, I simply wouldnīt do it. What you think about what I should think or do, while interesting, is completely irrelevant. Mike Connor |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 8, 5:07*am, Wayne Knight wrote:
On Aug 7, 9:54*pm, wrote: Hmm.......... seems I am no closer to understanding what makes you people tick than I ever was. The fact that you support such extremely dishonourable conduct is quite astonishing. *I simply fail to comprehend how that can be. Dishonorable conduct? You have a beef with certain posters so you decide to innudate us with multiple posts that say the same thing, most of it gibberish and you want to talk about dishonorable conduct. Your behavior these past few days borders on some the most infantile crap most of us have ever seen from a reputed adult. But at the end of the day, we can no more control Ken than we can control you. We operate in a free environment and those of us in America, at least, value our freedoms, one of which is the freedom of speech. The Ken and you got into offer remarks you made about Gays in Europe does not make things dishonorable here. Your comments, however they were intended, came across as homophobic and Ken never has been afraid to express his opinion and you played right into it. Personally I think most of the problems result from cultural differences that most of us have not experienced nor we have any comprehension of it. Much the same way you played into with Gehrke or any other numerous other spats over the years. Hell, I remember you called me ":stupid" for disagreeing with one of your fishing assertions once. Before you call me a liar, remember there is a large archive of posts on google. Ken plays you like a fiddle and you walk right into it. What I do or don't do has nothing to do with it. You own your website and the content, you don't own ROFF nor do you own ROFFT. And you know darn well you are pushing if not exceeding the boundaries of the terms of participation for most internet isps and websites over some perceived slight. As others have said, you take this stuff way too seriously. Your fly fishing jones goes beyond what most of us here think as normal, but at the same time the olympics will soon be upon us with people that did nothing but practice their sports for years for this chance to participate. When you';re as serious as you are about something, it becomes hard to see the forest for the trees and to bring the level you are imparting to the level of the person you are consulting. Your fly line splicing is a perfect example. Most of us don't need to playing with heads to fish the waters we fish over here. Maybe how and where you fish it is important, and good for you that you can do it. That I don't doesn't mean anything more than I don't make and use shooting heads. Regardless of what you think of Ken. I consider him a friend, I may not agree with him on his opinions or how he presents his arguments, all the time but last I checked agreeing with someone all the time was not a requirement to be a friend. So I'll add my name to the list that asks you to chill. Honor comes in many forms and doing dishonorable things as revenge on something you think is dishonorable does not justify it. You know it. Oh, and as for "playing me like a fiddle", firstly, if you are aware that he is simply provoking defaming and lying about others simply for fun or perverse pleasure, why donīt you do something about it? Evil only triumphs because good men do nothing. Do you consider yourself a good man? How do you justify this creatureīs behaviour to yourself? Trying to justify ot to me, or somehow blaming me for the fact that your friend is a total mother****er is more than somewhat riduculous. Up to now I have respected what you wrote abaout a lot of things in a quiet sensible manner. However, if you support a ****ing total ****bag like Fortenberry, you are in actual fact no better than he is, and forfeit all respect as a result. Mike Connor |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 8 Aug 2008 19:40:47 -0700 (PDT),
wrote: However, if you support a ****ing total ****bag like Fortenberry, you are in actual fact no better than he is, and forfeit all respect as a result. Well, I can't speak for Wayne, but if it is a choice between you and Fortenberry, that decision is quite easy. Dave |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|