![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I haven't posted anything in a long time because....I didn't
have much to say. But here's an interesting story: Sarah Palin is a space alien, oops, no, that's the wrong story. What is interesting is Hebgen dam right now. About a week ago a vertical square tube of reinforced concrete, that forms the output flow for the dam, imploded insward, suddenly allowing 3500cfs flow out the tube. Montana Power made a press release saying they appologized, but they would have it all under control soon. There was no danger, they said. But in the mean time all campgrounds downstream of the dam are closed, and the fishing sucks. This is peak late June flow level. I started thinking about it, and I suspected this was a lot worse than they were letting on. The collapsed outflow tube is a good thing for the fishery. I sucks the water off the bottom of the lake, so the outflow stays cool in summer. Without the tube, the damn would have to flow out over the top, using emergency overlow channels. But any over-the-top flow in summer would be a fishing disaster, because it would turn the Madison into a smallmouth bass fishery. Mt Power said not to worry. They would lower a heavy steel somethingorother down around or into the tube to restrict the flow. Today they announced they'd given up on that idea: it was too dangerous. Trying to manipulate equipment and heavy metal plates in deep turbulent water just wasn't working out the way they wanted it to. So what happens next? They'd better figure something out fast. If 3500cfs goes over the damn all winter, ice jams will wash out every bridge between Quake Lake and the dam at McAllister. Uncontrolled ice dams might knock the willy off that damn dam too. I worked a winter on an oil rig once, when I was young. At one point we did a "work over rig" where we cut off a crumpled casing 2500 feet down, rethreaded the casing and re-cased it, all with natural gas leaking around us the whole time. No smoking within a mile of the rig and they had special spark arresters on the big V-12 diesels that ran the rig. That was bad, but possible. But if you add huge swirling currents and water pressure into that mix, then you begin to understand how difficult it would be to fix an outflow tube deep down at the bottom of a lake. They could plug it in various ways. But then the water will go over the top, which would be summer time fisheries disaster. To fix the tube, they might have to drain the lake. They didn't say that. But I did. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So what happens next? *They'd better figure something out fast.
If 3500cfs goes over the damn all winter, ice jams will wash out every bridge between Quake Lake and the dam at McAllister. Uncontrolled ice dams might knock the willy off that damn dam too. Okay, wouldn't Quake Lake take the brunt of this? Quake is right below Hebgen. I'm trying to figure out the dynamics here. Frank Reid |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Frank Reid © 2008 wrote:
So what happens next? They'd better figure something out fast. If 3500cfs goes over the damn all winter, ice jams will wash out every bridge between Quake Lake and the dam at McAllister. Uncontrolled ice dams might knock the willy off that damn dam too. Okay, wouldn't Quake Lake take the brunt of this? Quake is right below Hebgen. I'm trying to figure out the dynamics here. Frank Reid This isn't a dam collapse story. It's all about flow levels. What ever flows into quake lake will also flow (at that rate) out of quake lake. The Madison is currently high and muddy and not fishing at all. 3500cfs has never happened in winter. The riverbed isn't big enough to handle it in cold weather. 3500cfs in February would build up ice jambs 50 feet high. They need to figure out a way to restrict the uncontrolled flow (now feeding out off the bottom of the lake). They probably will figure out how to plug that tube, temporarily. But they will have to fix it eventually. To do that--without draining the lake--would be an engineering miracle, the way I see it. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just my .02 slide a huge metal plate down the lake side of the dam
blocking the hole.........Open up the side gate so water flows around and not over build a new tube on the river side slide into hole secure problem solved...........Tell them to send me the check........... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike wrote:
Just my .02 slide a huge metal plate down the lake side of the dam blocking the hole.........Open up the side gate so water flows around and not over build a new tube on the river side slide into hole secure problem solved...........Tell them to send me the check........... That might be what they have to do. The radio had a few more details an hour ago. They tried to poke a metal rod down the inside of the output tube. That rod was supposed to guide a metal plate down the inside of the tube, down to the rupture. That would restrict flow. But the rod started shaking so violently (because of deep, powerful turbulence at the bottom of the tube) it threatened to collapse the crane that was lowering the rod. Now they're back to head scratching. They did mention the lake is dropping by 5" per day. That's 150" or 12.5' per month. Or roughly 50' drop in four months. In other words, if they don't get it plugged, the lake will drain by winter's end. I assume they WILL get it plugged, one way or another. And then (as you suggested) the best approach might well be to build an new outflow tube, rather than fixing the old one. That will take at least a season. That would probably mean a lot of 75 degree water going over the top of the damn dam next summer. Better hope they get it fixed in one season. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
salmobytes wrote:
Mike wrote: Just my .02 I drove down there today, jumped the fence when nobody was looking and shot a bunch of photos. It's quite a sight. There is a huge amount of water geysering out of the 75 year old (Hebgen Dam) syphon tube. At the current rate, the lake will be empty (or at least down to the bottom of the outflow tube) by the first of the year. That seems to what they're waiting for now.....in other words, hurry up and wait. Fix it next year. So we might have to buy some pitch forks, for all those big browns in the soon-to-be-empty lake. Actually I don't the think the bottom of the syphon tube actually drains the lake. But there will be some very long steep and muddy banks to Hebgen Lake next summer......I think. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 11, 8:44*am, salmobytes wrote:
Here are some photos I took yesterday..... http://montana-riverboats.com/Robopa...Robopages/Hebg.... Great pics and thanks for reminding me of the best stocked (fly wise) fly shop I've ever been to. The Beartooth is spectacular. Frank Reid (my favorite fishing hat is from there) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
salmobytes wrote:
I'm not sure what the following means. But it does sound like good news. http://www.montanasnewsstation.com/G...0435,menu227_7 =========== Engineers think they have found a way to stop the flow of water from the Hebgen Lake dam. PPL engineers discovered that giant timbers in front of the stuck head gates have deteriorated. Thursday afternoon, crews were preparing to replace those timbers in hopes of controlling the flow of water and easing turbulence so the gates could be closed on their own. The waters rushing through the gates could be stemmed as soon as this weekend, according to Mark Lambrecht, PPL public information officer. Workers are using a special sonar equipped boat brought in from Seattle. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
salmobytes wrote:
......now some good news, afterall. http://www.montanasnewsstation.com/G...0435,menu227_7 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|