![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://www.bostonherald.com/news/reg...s_ Uzi_death/
Lessee here - an 8-year-old boy is dead, having shot himself with an out-of-control full-auto Uzi, and the local DA is wondering if anyone might have been negligent...uh, ya think? While I firmly believe that gun ownership, in general, is a Constitutionally-protected individual right in the US, I'm pretty sure it doesn't apply to allowing preteens to operate full-auto close-quarters combat weapons. What possible defense to criminal negligence could a parent or instructor possibly have to allowing a 8 YO child to even handle such a weapon with a loaded magazine, much less fire the ****ing thing? And for those that don't know (probably most readers), a Micro Uzi on full-auto is difficult to control for an untrained adult of average strength and weighs considerably more than the average pistol or revolver. I have experience with ones in all of the available calibers, including while fitted with sub-caliber training devices (.22), and I would say that there is no way whatsoever that a child could possibly fire any of them safely while on full-auto. Such a firearm is not a target pistol nor a "plinking" firearm, it is purely and exactly what it was designed to be: a weapon, and children have no business whatsoever even handling such weapons, to say nothing of actually firing the thing. A sad sheesh, R ....and yeah, the father, the (alleged) "instructor" and anyone else involved in allowing this tragedy deserve some jail time, with the alleged "instructor" never being allow to so much a touch a firearm ever again or "supervise" anyone else doing so... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, yeah. The whole effin state is stooopid.
Why just yesterday it was revealed that a State Senator, one Diane Wilkerson, was arrested for bribery. The papers had pictures of her stuffing bribe money into her bra. Uh, one has to ask: How much money will a bra hold? Somewhere in the vicinity of $23,000. This is the same "legislator" that was found guilty of not paying income taxes a few years ago. And yet....... she keeps getting reelected. Yeah, people in Boston are stoopid. You should see the latest Barney Frank commercial. Pathetic! He talks like he has a mouth full of dick...... oooops, wait a minute...... he does! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:55:44 -0400, Dave LaCourse
wrote: Well, yeah. The whole effin state is stooopid. Why just yesterday it was revealed that a State Senator, one Diane Wilkerson, was arrested for bribery. The papers had pictures of her stuffing bribe money into her bra. Uh, one has to ask: How much money will a bra hold? Somewhere in the vicinity of $23,000. This is the same "legislator" that was found guilty of not paying income taxes a few years ago. And yet....... she keeps getting reelected. Yeah, people in Boston are stoopid. You should see the latest Barney Frank commercial. Pathetic! He talks like he has a mouth full of dick...... oooops, wait a minute...... he does! What in hell does Frank being gay have to do with letting a child fire a Micro Uzi and being stupid? Sheesh, part deux, R |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave LaCourse wrote:
Well, yeah. The whole effin state is stooopid. snip You should see the latest Barney Frank commercial. Pathetic! ... Hell, you should move to Germany and hang out with The Loony, you sound just like him. And yes, it is pathetic. -- Ken Fortenberry |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave LaCourse wrote:
snip The papers had pictures of her stuffing bribe money into her bra. Uh, one has to ask: How much money will a bra hold? ... Why ask us ? Strap on a D cup, stuff your flabby old man boobs in it and gather the empirical evidence for yourself. ;-) Uh ... no need to report your data, you're probably the only one interested in that particular "experiment". -- Ken Fortenberry |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 12:52:01 -0500, Ken Fortenberry
wrote: Why ask us ? Strap on a D cup, stuff your flabby old man boobs in it and gather the empirical evidence for yourself. ;-) Uh ... no need to report your data, you're probably the only one interested in that particular "experiment". I've seen a recent picture of you (kaaaccckk). If there be any flabby old man boobs, they be yours. I'll have you know I am down to 205 and bench pressing my weight. Not bad for an old man. And what about that marathon thingy...... you ever gonna run that or was it all talk? d;o) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave LaCourse wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote: Why ask us ? Strap on a D cup, stuff your flabby old man boobs in it and gather the empirical evidence for yourself. ;-) Uh ... no need to report your data, you're probably the only one interested in that particular "experiment". I've seen a recent picture of you (kaaaccckk). If there be any flabby old man boobs, they be yours. I'll have you know I am down to 205 and bench pressing my weight. Not bad for an old man. That's just wonderful and I'll bet you have regular bowel movements too. That Metamucil is wonderful stuff. ;-) And what about that marathon thingy...... you ever gonna run that or was it all talk? Well, I ran Chicago way back when, finished in 4:15 which wasn't bad for a 42 year old. I'm not going to qualify for Boston anytime soon, but the older I get the slower the qualifying time so in that sense time's on my side. -- Ken Fortenberry |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:05:07 -0500, Ken Fortenberry
wrote: time's on my side. Take it from an old man, time is *never* on your side. Dave |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 29, 8:43*pm, wrote:
http://www.bostonherald.com/news/reg...28_DA:_Crimina... Lessee here - an 8-year-old boy is dead, having shot himself with an out-of-control full-auto Uzi, and the local DA is wondering if anyone might have been negligent...uh, ya think? While I firmly believe that gun ownership, in general, is a Constitutionally-protected individual right in the US, I'm pretty sure it doesn't apply to allowing preteens to operate full-auto close-quarters combat weapons. *What possible defense to criminal negligence could a parent or instructor possibly have to allowing a 8 YO child to even handle such a weapon with a loaded magazine, much less fire the ****ing thing? And for those that don't know (probably most readers), a Micro Uzi on full-auto is difficult to control for an untrained adult of average strength and weighs considerably more than the average pistol or revolver. *I have experience with ones in all of the available calibers, including while fitted with sub-caliber training devices (.22), and I would say that there is no way whatsoever that a child could possibly fire any of them safely while on full-auto. *Such a firearm is not a target pistol nor a "plinking" firearm, it is purely and exactly what it was designed to be: a weapon, and children have no business whatsoever even handling such weapons, to say nothing of actually firing the thing. A sad sheesh, R ...and yeah, the father, the (alleged) "instructor" and anyone else involved in allowing this tragedy deserve some jail time, with the alleged "instructor" never being allow to so much a touch a firearm ever again or "supervise" anyone else doing so... It ain't just Bostonians (wait, that didn't come out right...) Stoopid people aren't just in Boston... http://tinyurl.com/6obk3t --riverman |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Boston Whalers - To buy or not to buy. | Jon | General Discussion | 2 | March 14th, 2007 11:33 PM |
OT - friggin amateurs | Jarmo Hurri | Fly Fishing | 0 | October 7th, 2005 08:26 PM |
fishing in or near Boston MA. | simon | General Discussion | 1 | June 2nd, 2005 12:27 AM |