![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The price of tungsten beads always blows my mind ( I bought some today,
fresh reminder ) So, I have a couple questions for you guys that know your nymphing stuff 1) Is the tungsten worth it, does the extra weight really turn into more fish hooked? for YOU 2) How the hell do you tell, a year or more later, looking into your boxes which flies are tungsten, which regular bead |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
1) Is the tungsten worth it, does the extra weight really turn into more
fish hooked? *for YOU I primarily use them in high water to get flies down without extra bulk. 2) How the hell do you tell, a year or more later, looking into your boxes which flies are tungsten, which regular bead Thread color. Weighted flies that have lead or tungsten vice regular beadheads, I tie with a red thread head, or in the case of the beadheads, red behind the bead. Frank Reid |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Frank Reid © 2008" wrote I primarily use them in high water to get flies down without extra bulk. I've only used them, so far, for a specific situation, i.e. fishing midge pupa patterns on a long leader under a bobbercator in stillwater ... the extra weight is worth the extra $ since it saves a lot of fishing time that would just be waiting time with lighter flies But today when I was buying more small TungBeads for those flies I gave thought to other uses ... thought also spurred by wanting to fish deeper in my local river lately. I associate split shot with all the things I don't like about nymphing, so other ways to weight appeal. The colored thread is a good idea, do you tie the whole thing with different thread or just add a collar after it's finished? oh, I have used tungbeads in a second situation .... I like sight nymphing and I have found that IF you get your fly to the right spot before you scare him he seems to basically always eat it ... i.e. pattern doesn't matter much in nymphs ( another reason I'm not too keen on nymphing, but that's a different thread ) So, anyway, I carry 5 different nymphs tied more for various sink rate than any other factor ( they are all pretty small, I doubt even the nymph eating dummy is going to grab things too big ) ... the fastest sinking is a tungsten ( 5 silver tungsten beads, to be exact ) affair I call a PS Nymph When I spot a fish for sight nymphing the fly I choose is based on his postion and sink rate needed to reach that position, not what's hatching or other factors |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 22, 5:43*pm, "Larry L" wrote:
"Frank Reid © 2008" wrote I primarily use them in high water to get flies down without extra bulk. I've only used them, so far, for a specific situation, i.e. fishing midge pupa patterns on a long leader under a bobbercator in stillwater * * .... the extra weight is worth the extra $ since it saves a lot of fishing time that would just be waiting time with lighter flies I too also use them for exactly that situation as well. It's a type of fishing that many on ROFF may not be used to. Until I moved to California and fished Lake Crowley I had never met anyone bobber fishing with midges in stillwater. The tungsten beads I have are not round but faceted so they are easily distinguishable from other bead head materials - at least on my flies. There are two reasons why I find them useful for stillwater midging. Sometimes the bobber is adjusted so that the midge is rather deep (more than 10 feet from the surface). If a fish takes on the drop it will not be easily noticed. So I want to get to a tight line ASAP. The other reason is that when there is an algae bloom the fast sinking fly seems to grab less of the gunk. Again, algae bloom is also something that is peculiar to this type of fishing. The other times when I really need to get deep fast is when fishing pocket water. However in most of the pocket water around here, having a tungsten bead head really makes no difference - it just ain't heavy enough. I lob one or two of the largest Dinsmore egg shots to get down deep in the white water. Regarding some of the other mentions of getting deep quickly I was reminded of not any specific passage from but a general note from Lee Wulff's "Salmon on the Fly" about the skill required to get a fly to sink deep enough (without shot or bead heads of course) while having a natural action and without spooking the (Atlantic) salmon. Mu |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "mu" wrote Until I moved to California and fished Lake Crowley I had never met anyone bobber fishing with midges in stillwater. The tungsten beads I have are not round but faceted so they are easily distinguishable from other bead head materials - at least on my flies. Crowley is where I was introduced to the technique, too. I've seen it used elsewhere since that time, it's fairly common on Hebgen. It's amazing how much more effective it can be than "traditional" stillwater wooly-bugger stripping, at times. Another less common lake technique is very fast sinking lines and floating, foam, flies ... the Brits call them 'boobies' .... it's another very effective approach and one fish don't see much, usually a plus .. slowly slide the line along the bottom, thus swimming the fly just off it on it's short leader I saw some faceted beads but never considered the idea that they would be easy to tell from others ... just that they might flash more vigorously as each flat caught and reflected light. I'll get some, somes like a logical solution to my probem. Now, moving on. I assume you know the trick of attaching your forceps to the fly and slowly lowering it to touch bottom to measure depth and help set the bobbicator to keep the fly just off the bottom ( obviously you remove the forceps after the measuring ;-) One problem I've never solved is the difficulty landing fish if your fishing depth is more than about 8 feet. The bobber jams onto the rod's tip and keeps you from reeling in far enough to get to the fish easily with a net. So I sometimes end up grapping the leader and praying for the last few feet as I pull without the shock absorber of the rod ... the better the fish, the more fervent the prayers ;-) This risks breaking off a good fish, that may have been played a little too long since that tendency follows from not being able to land him quickly, and I always hate that few seconds. Have you come up with a better solution to this "can't reach him OR reel in any farther" problem with long leader bobber fishing? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 26, 9:00*am, "Larry L" wrote:
One problem I've never solved is the difficulty landing fish if your fishing depth is more than about 8 feet. * * The bobber jams onto the rod's tip and keeps you from reeling in far enough to get to the fish easily with a net.. The use of forceps as depth gauge I learned from Tom Loe. Regarding deep midging, first, I use the pop-top indicators which can be removed without having to slide down to the end of the line. http://sierrapac.com/terminal_tac.htm It's a dicey proposition to remove the indicator from the leader while you've got a good fish on but this indicator is about the easiest to perform such an operation. Second, when I know I will be midging I bring along a landing net with a 6 ft long handle. BTW, one more nice thing about the pop-top indicators is that when on the stream and not nymphing I leave the little rubber sleeve at the end of my fly line and then slide it down the leader when I need to quickly switch to indicator nymphing w/o having to re-tie. There are several indicator designs which permit this too but I like the pop- top's ability to communicate a lot more information about what is going on underwater (while stillwater midging and on rivers) as opposed to yarn indicators which can be removed w/o retying (via half hitch) or the slit foam indicators with the rubber insert which do not provide a nice drift. The little stick also shows me if my midge leader is really hanging straight down. Mu |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 23:15:49 GMT, "Larry L"
wrote: The price of tungsten beads always blows my mind ( I bought some today, fresh reminder ) So, I have a couple questions for you guys that know your nymphing stuff 1) Is the tungsten worth it, does the extra weight really turn into more fish hooked? for YOU I use it instead of lead if I want a nymph to sink quickly, especially in fast or deep water. 2) How the hell do you tell, a year or more later, looking into your boxes which flies are tungsten, which regular bead As Frank sez, thread color near the bead - black for tungsten, light brown for lead. Or, you could do a nice pastel color, Larry. You know, Idaho Pink and California Fuschia d;o) Dave \ |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave LaCourse" wrote Or, you could do a nice pastel color, Larry. You know, Idaho Pink and California Fuschia d;o) :-) I've been trying to find some nice paisley print waders .... Maybe I'll wait to tie the flies until I can pick a matching color ASIDE: Your TR brought something to mind when you spoke of frustration casting to fish you know are rejecting your efforts. To show how different we can all be, I don't think that would frustrate me, just increase my determination. BUT, a few casts "fishing the water," without results, wondering if there were even fish seeing my fly, would have me frustrated to no end. That is the major reason I've never pursued most of the 'lots of casts per fish, but big fish when you get one' venues and styles ... I get frustrated too easy UNLESS I can see him, but, if I can see him, I can put hours into the catching, no problem. Your report made me consider the sea-run browns of TdF as a possible dream location for the first time, mainly because I had always assumed it would be hours and hours of blind casting for every big fish ... and, sure I like big fish, but .... |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 23 Jan 2009 01:43:05 GMT, "Larry L"
wrote: ASIDE: Your TR brought something to mind when you spoke of frustration casting to fish you know are rejecting your efforts. These are fish that are coming into the river to spawn, and like Atlantic (and Pacific) Salmon are not striking the fly to eat it but because they are ****ed and annoyed by it. They weren't striking the fly because it didn't look delicious, but because they weren't angry at it. I could make them angry only by placing the fly very near their snout. I believe that depth played a very big part in their aggression. If I didn't get any strikes with a heavily weighted nymph, I would change to one that was not weighted at all and relied on the sinking leader to get the fly down. Other times I got hits by removing the sinking leader and tossing tube flies at them, just under the surface. It was a learning experience and *really* made fishing a three demensional sport. Neither the guide nor I know why they boil or roll on the surface, sometimes coming completely out of the water like a whale. It's really something to see. I did get an eight pounder by skating a fly across the surface - a salmon fishing Bomber on a size 10 hook, white and red. Go figure. d;o) I'm going to look into tying some tube flies for my local waters. Don't know how to tie them, but I have a good source that can teach me. Dave |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Larry L" wrote in message ... The price of tungsten beads always blows my mind ( I bought some today, fresh reminder ) So, I have a couple questions for you guys that know your nymphing stuff 1) Is the tungsten worth it, does the extra weight really turn into more fish hooked? for YOU 2) How the hell do you tell, a year or more later, looking into your boxes which flies are tungsten, which regular bead shouldn't this involve lead vs. no lead? john |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
tear drop tungsten beads | Sol | Fly Fishing Tying | 2 | April 27th, 2008 09:19 PM |
Tungsten Weigths | [email protected] | Bass Fishing | 8 | December 5th, 2005 01:27 AM |