![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Take a look at the Federal Register
http://www.archives.gov/federal_regi...vote_2000.html and you will see that the Green Party was "omitted" from the official tally in Georgia, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Dakota and Wyoming. Being disenfranchised after the "vote", which is apparently what happened in North Carolina, should give all of us the heebie-jeebies. -- Ken Fortenberry |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Take a look at the Federal Register http://www.archives.gov/federal_regi...vote_2000.html and you will see that the Green Party was "omitted" from the official tally in Georgia, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Dakota and Wyoming. Being disenfranchised after the "vote", which is apparently what happened in North Carolina, should give all of us the heebie-jeebies. As I understand it, NC Statutes currently require a petition of at least 60,000 registered voters to constitute a "third party" and afford a "third party" candidate a place on the ballot. I also believe this is a "left-over" from the days of Democratic Party rule in NC when similar numbers were used to suppress Republican voters. While I don't have a specific numeric preference, I'd like to see this relaxed to the point that any group, (2 or more voters) wishing to form/constitute a party anywhere within the visible spectrum should be able to do so without interference. For example, hot-pink or mauve might be the next rave, needing only a popular slogan and a few bucks to satisfy the Secretary of State. Being ever-so mindful of political correctness in these restless times, I wonder if "party-colors" outside the visible spectrum should be excluded. For example, I *do* have a preference for near-infrared. Should I feel disenfranchised if *that* is not allowed. Wondering and deeply concerned in NC.......well, sorta.. Tom |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message y.com... Take a look at the Federal Register http://www.archives.gov/federal_regi...ular_vote_2000 ..html and you will see that the Green Party was "omitted" from the official tally in Georgia, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Dakota and Wyoming. Being disenfranchised after the "vote", which is apparently what happened in North Carolina, should give all of us the heebie-jeebies. -- Ken Fortenberry I voted for Wavy Gravy and my next door neighbor. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lennie wrote:I voted for Wavy Gravy and my next door neighbor.
I see where Kinky Friedman is running for governor of Texas and has endorsements from both President George Bush and Molly Ivins. I think I can see the need for a bumper sticker for the new Hemi. Big Dale |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Big Dale" wrote in message ... Lennie wrote:I voted for Wavy Gravy and my next door neighbor. I see where Kinky Friedman is running for governor of Texas and has endorsements from both President George Bush and Molly Ivins. I think I can see the need for a bumper sticker for the new Hemi. Big Dale kewchie! kewchie! kewchie! waitriss! when a jewish cowboy gets elected governor of texas, THAT's diversity. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Frozen North bass | RichG | Bass Fishing | 8 | June 26th, 2004 06:47 PM |
For the boys in the North | J Buck | Bass Fishing | 16 | March 2nd, 2004 01:20 PM |
north east fly fishing | -=SAGE=- | Fly Fishing | 0 | November 4th, 2003 02:45 AM |
TR: Pearl River, north of the Arctic Circle | Roger Ohlund | Fly Fishing | 11 | October 11th, 2003 11:05 AM |
North Tahoe, Incline Village, Pyramid Lake, Nevada | Jackson West | Fly Fishing | 3 | October 3rd, 2003 04:29 PM |