A Fishing forum. FishingBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » FishingBanter forum » rec.outdoors.fishing newsgroups » Fly Fishing
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Being constent



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 24th, 2009, 06:50 PM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly
sandy[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 36
Default Being constent

I haven't participated here much--last year or so.
There was just too much political wrangling going on
and I found it too hard to ignore. So I largely took a powder.
(no not that kind. all my dollar bills are still in my wallet).

So, exhibiting typical consistency on my part, the following:

The republicans unanimously opposed historic health care
legislation today--watered down and impotent as it was, due
to their unanimous hostility for over a year now. But lose the
battle they did. Or soon will, as the senate was the only
reactionary chance left for them.

All of which reminded me:

Republicans opposed social security, originally and as recently as
a few years ago.

Republicans opposed the Marshall Plan after WWII.

In the early 50s republicans did half-heartedly supported voting rights
for southern blacks, largely because it was Yellow Dog Dixicrats who
supported segregation. But after the civil rights bill passed and it
became clear the new wave of black voters would all vote democratic,
the republicans almost instantly switched camps and became
states-rights reactionaries. They got the Ross Barnett, Bull Conner-like
democrats and they've controlled the redneck south ever since.

The republicans also opposed Medicare.
And now they've done absolutely everything possible to give
Health Insurance corporations the right continue ripping us off, and to
keep upwards of 20 million citizens out of any kind of health care luck
at all.

I'm beginning to think this kind of stubborn
resistance to needed change is a genetic condition. Rational
evaluation of the evidence just doesn't support this kind
of boneheaded behavior.

The only thing non-obstructionist they've ever done is to
drive us into near bankruptcy by slashing revenues (taxes)
and giving most of that the rich, and to start a series of
ill-advised and remarkably expensive wars. And I count Viet Nam
in that category too, even though Johnson started it. Because
everybody knows Johnson did that because he was so afraid of
right-wing reaction.

:-)

  #2  
Old December 24th, 2009, 07:53 PM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly
george9219
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 131
Default Being constent

On Dec 24, 1:50*pm, sandy wrote:
I haven't participated here much--last year or so.
There was just too much political wrangling going on
and I found it too hard to ignore. So I largely took a powder.
(no not that kind. all my dollar bills are still in my wallet).

So, exhibiting typical consistency on my part, the following:

The republicans unanimously opposed historic health care
legislation today--watered down and impotent as it was, due
to their unanimous hostility for over a year now. But lose the
battle they did. Or soon will, as the senate was the only
reactionary chance left for them.

All of which reminded me:

Republicans opposed social security, originally and as recently as
a few years ago.

Republicans opposed the Marshall Plan after WWII.

In the early 50s republicans did half-heartedly supported voting rights
for southern blacks, largely because it was Yellow Dog Dixicrats who
supported segregation. But after the civil rights bill passed and it
became clear the new wave of black voters would all vote democratic,
the republicans almost instantly switched camps and became
states-rights reactionaries. They got the Ross Barnett, Bull Conner-like
democrats and they've controlled the redneck south ever since.

The republicans also opposed Medicare.
And now they've done absolutely everything possible to give
Health Insurance corporations the right continue ripping us off, and to
keep upwards of 20 million citizens out of any kind of health care luck
at all.

I'm beginning to think this kind of stubborn
resistance to needed change is a genetic condition. Rational
evaluation of the evidence just doesn't support this kind
of boneheaded behavior.

The only thing non-obstructionist they've ever done is to
drive us into near bankruptcy by slashing revenues (taxes)
and giving most of that the rich, and to start a series of
ill-advised and remarkably expensive wars. *And I count Viet Nam
in that category too, even though Johnson started it. Because
everybody knows Johnson did that because he was so afraid of
right-wing reaction.

:-)


Nice troll.....not gonna bite.
  #3  
Old December 24th, 2009, 08:27 PM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly
Mark Bowen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 301
Default Being constent


"sandy" wrote in message
. ..
I haven't participated here much--last year or so.
There was just too much political wrangling going on
and I found it too hard to ignore. So I largely took a powder.
(no not that kind. all my dollar bills are still in my wallet).

So, exhibiting typical consistency on my part, the following:

The republicans unanimously opposed historic health care
legislation today--watered down and impotent as it was, due
to their unanimous hostility for over a year now. But lose the
battle they did. Or soon will, as the senate was the only
reactionary chance left for them.

All of which reminded me:

Republicans opposed social security, originally and as recently as
a few years ago.

Republicans opposed the Marshall Plan after WWII.

In the early 50s republicans did half-heartedly supported voting rights
for southern blacks, largely because it was Yellow Dog Dixicrats who
supported segregation. But after the civil rights bill passed and it
became clear the new wave of black voters would all vote democratic,
the republicans almost instantly switched camps and became
states-rights reactionaries. They got the Ross Barnett, Bull Conner-like
democrats and they've controlled the redneck south ever since.

The republicans also opposed Medicare.
And now they've done absolutely everything possible to give
Health Insurance corporations the right continue ripping us off, and to
keep upwards of 20 million citizens out of any kind of health care luck
at all.

I'm beginning to think this kind of stubborn
resistance to needed change is a genetic condition. Rational
evaluation of the evidence just doesn't support this kind
of boneheaded behavior.

The only thing non-obstructionist they've ever done is to
drive us into near bankruptcy by slashing revenues (taxes)
and giving most of that the rich, and to start a series of
ill-advised and remarkably expensive wars. And I count Viet Nam
in that category too, even though Johnson started it. Because
everybody knows Johnson did that because he was so afraid of
right-wing reaction.

:-)


What he said.

And Sandy, I'm still waiting for a mailing address from you or should I
just send the flyz to your web address :~^ ) once I tie them, of course.

Op


  #4  
Old December 24th, 2009, 08:46 PM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly
David LaCourse
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 617
Default Being constent

Merry Christmas, Sandy. And a very prosperous New Year to you and yours.

Dave


  #5  
Old December 24th, 2009, 10:00 PM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 165
Default Being constent

On Dec 24, 10:50*am, sandy wrote:
I haven't participated here much--last year or so.
There was just too much political wrangling going on
and I found it too hard to ignore. So I largely took a powder.
(no not that kind. all my dollar bills are still in my wallet).

So, exhibiting typical consistency on my part, the following:

The republicans unanimously opposed historic health care
legislation today--watered down and impotent as it was, due
to their unanimous hostility for over a year now. But lose the
battle they did. Or soon will, as the senate was the only
reactionary chance left for them.

All of which reminded me:

Republicans opposed social security, originally and as recently as
a few years ago.

Republicans opposed the Marshall Plan after WWII.

In the early 50s republicans did half-heartedly supported voting rights
for southern blacks, largely because it was Yellow Dog Dixicrats who
supported segregation. But after the civil rights bill passed and it
became clear the new wave of black voters would all vote democratic,
the republicans almost instantly switched camps and became
states-rights reactionaries. They got the Ross Barnett, Bull Conner-like
democrats and they've controlled the redneck south ever since.

The republicans also opposed Medicare.
And now they've done absolutely everything possible to give
Health Insurance corporations the right continue ripping us off, and to
keep upwards of 20 million citizens out of any kind of health care luck
at all.

I'm beginning to think this kind of stubborn
resistance to needed change is a genetic condition. Rational
evaluation of the evidence just doesn't support this kind
of boneheaded behavior.

The only thing non-obstructionist they've ever done is to
drive us into near bankruptcy by slashing revenues (taxes)
and giving most of that the rich, and to start a series of
ill-advised and remarkably expensive wars. *And I count Viet Nam
in that category too, even though Johnson started it. Because
everybody knows Johnson did that because he was so afraid of
right-wing reaction.

:-)


Here's my favorite quote from William F. Buckley, founder of the
modern conservative movement:

“A Conservative is a fellow who is standing athwart history yelling
"Stop!"”

Just to give you an idea of the quality and depth of his opinions, he
also said (or wrote):

“The Beatles are not merely awful. They are so unbelievably horrible,
so appallingly unmusical, so dogmatically insensitive to the magic of
the art, that they qualify as crowned heads of antimusic.”
  #6  
Old December 25th, 2009, 01:31 AM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly
MajorOz
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 349
Default Being constent

On Dec 24, 4:00*pm, " wrote:
On Dec 24, 10:50*am, sandy wrote:



I haven't participated here much--last year or so.
There was just too much political wrangling going on
and I found it too hard to ignore. So I largely took a powder.
(no not that kind. all my dollar bills are still in my wallet).


So, exhibiting typical consistency on my part, the following:


The republicans unanimously opposed historic health care
legislation today--watered down and impotent as it was, due
to their unanimous hostility for over a year now. But lose the
battle they did. Or soon will, as the senate was the only
reactionary chance left for them.


All of which reminded me:


Republicans opposed social security, originally and as recently as
a few years ago.


Republicans opposed the Marshall Plan after WWII.


In the early 50s republicans did half-heartedly supported voting rights
for southern blacks, largely because it was Yellow Dog Dixicrats who
supported segregation. But after the civil rights bill passed and it
became clear the new wave of black voters would all vote democratic,
the republicans almost instantly switched camps and became
states-rights reactionaries. They got the Ross Barnett, Bull Conner-like
democrats and they've controlled the redneck south ever since.


The republicans also opposed Medicare.
And now they've done absolutely everything possible to give
Health Insurance corporations the right continue ripping us off, and to
keep upwards of 20 million citizens out of any kind of health care luck
at all.


I'm beginning to think this kind of stubborn
resistance to needed change is a genetic condition. Rational
evaluation of the evidence just doesn't support this kind
of boneheaded behavior.


The only thing non-obstructionist they've ever done is to
drive us into near bankruptcy by slashing revenues (taxes)
and giving most of that the rich, and to start a series of
ill-advised and remarkably expensive wars. *And I count Viet Nam
in that category too, even though Johnson started it. Because
everybody knows Johnson did that because he was so afraid of
right-wing reaction.


:-)


Here's my favorite quote from William F. Buckley, founder of the
modern conservative movement:

“A Conservative is a fellow who is standing athwart history yelling
"Stop!"”

Just to give you an idea of the quality and depth of his opinions, he
also said (or wrote):

“The Beatles are not merely awful. They are so unbelievably horrible,
so appallingly unmusical, so dogmatically insensitive to the magic of
the art, that they qualify as crowned heads of antimusic.”


Well, at least, in this quote, he was correct, as history will (and to
a degree, already has) show(n). Their music does not "live". It was
a fad, was not musical, barely rhythmic, and appealed only to the
journalistic mind that believed it had found something, or to
rebellious dilatants.

cheers, anyway; and Merry Christmas

oz, who never confuses sales figures with quality
  #7  
Old December 25th, 2009, 02:13 AM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly
Tom Littleton[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 264
Default Being constent


"MajorOz" wrote in message
...
(regarding the Beatles)

Their music does not "live". It was
a fad, was not musical, barely rhythmic, and appealed only to the
journalistic mind that believed it had found something, or to
rebellious dilatants.


each to their own. Many, many folks who know way more about music than I,
would disagree. And this eclectic music listener, who listens to jazz,
classical, rock
and delta blues at times in the same evening, strongly disagrees.
Tom
p.s. sales numbers mean little to me, either......


  #8  
Old December 25th, 2009, 02:00 AM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly
Mark Bowen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 301
Default Being constent


"MajorOz" wrote in message
...
On Dec 24, 4:00 pm, " wrote:
On Dec 24, 10:50 am, sandy wrote:



I haven't participated here much--last year or so.
There was just too much political wrangling going on
and I found it too hard to ignore. So I largely took a powder.
(no not that kind. all my dollar bills are still in my wallet).


So, exhibiting typical consistency on my part, the following:


The republicans unanimously opposed historic health care
legislation today--watered down and impotent as it was, due
to their unanimous hostility for over a year now. But lose the
battle they did. Or soon will, as the senate was the only
reactionary chance left for them.


All of which reminded me:


Republicans opposed social security, originally and as recently as
a few years ago.


Republicans opposed the Marshall Plan after WWII.


In the early 50s republicans did half-heartedly supported voting rights
for southern blacks, largely because it was Yellow Dog Dixicrats who
supported segregation. But after the civil rights bill passed and it
became clear the new wave of black voters would all vote democratic,
the republicans almost instantly switched camps and became
states-rights reactionaries. They got the Ross Barnett, Bull Conner-like
democrats and they've controlled the redneck south ever since.


The republicans also opposed Medicare.
And now they've done absolutely everything possible to give
Health Insurance corporations the right continue ripping us off, and to
keep upwards of 20 million citizens out of any kind of health care luck
at all.


I'm beginning to think this kind of stubborn
resistance to needed change is a genetic condition. Rational
evaluation of the evidence just doesn't support this kind
of boneheaded behavior.


The only thing non-obstructionist they've ever done is to
drive us into near bankruptcy by slashing revenues (taxes)
and giving most of that the rich, and to start a series of
ill-advised and remarkably expensive wars. And I count Viet Nam
in that category too, even though Johnson started it. Because
everybody knows Johnson did that because he was so afraid of
right-wing reaction.


:-)


Here's my favorite quote from William F. Buckley, founder of the
modern conservative movement:

“A Conservative is a fellow who is standing athwart history yelling
"Stop!"”

Just to give you an idea of the quality and depth of his opinions, he
also said (or wrote):

“The Beatles are not merely awful. They are so unbelievably horrible,
so appallingly unmusical, so dogmatically insensitive to the magic of
the art, that they qualify as crowned heads of antimusic.”


Well, at least, in this quote, he was correct, as history will (and to
a degree, already has) show(n). Their music does not "live". It was
a fad, was not musical, barely rhythmic, and appealed only to the
journalistic mind that believed it had found something, or to
rebellious dilatants.

cheers, anyway; and Merry Christmas

oz, who never confuses sales figures with quality

So is it the Christmas spirtit or Satan that has you by the balls?!

If this ain't talent, the GOP will, enthusiastically, support all future Dem
initiatives.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5aSs...eature=related

Jeez, he hates college sportz and the greatest musical talent to ever grace
this godforsaken planet!

Op --a non-Christian with at least an inkling of the joy and spirit of the
season--


  #9  
Old December 26th, 2009, 10:02 PM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly
MajorOz
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 349
Default Being constent

On Dec 24, 8:00*pm, "Mark Bowen" wrote:
"MajorOz" wrote in message

...
On Dec 24, 4:00 pm, " wrote:



On Dec 24, 10:50 am, sandy wrote:


I haven't participated here much--last year or so.
There was just too much political wrangling going on
and I found it too hard to ignore. So I largely took a powder.
(no not that kind. all my dollar bills are still in my wallet).


So, exhibiting typical consistency on my part, the following:


The republicans unanimously opposed historic health care
legislation today--watered down and impotent as it was, due
to their unanimous hostility for over a year now. But lose the
battle they did. Or soon will, as the senate was the only
reactionary chance left for them.


All of which reminded me:


Republicans opposed social security, originally and as recently as
a few years ago.


Republicans opposed the Marshall Plan after WWII.


In the early 50s republicans did half-heartedly supported voting rights
for southern blacks, largely because it was Yellow Dog Dixicrats who
supported segregation. But after the civil rights bill passed and it
became clear the new wave of black voters would all vote democratic,
the republicans almost instantly switched camps and became
states-rights reactionaries. They got the Ross Barnett, Bull Conner-like
democrats and they've controlled the redneck south ever since.


The republicans also opposed Medicare.
And now they've done absolutely everything possible to give
Health Insurance corporations the right continue ripping us off, and to
keep upwards of 20 million citizens out of any kind of health care luck
at all.


I'm beginning to think this kind of stubborn
resistance to needed change is a genetic condition. Rational
evaluation of the evidence just doesn't support this kind
of boneheaded behavior.


The only thing non-obstructionist they've ever done is to
drive us into near bankruptcy by slashing revenues (taxes)
and giving most of that the rich, and to start a series of
ill-advised and remarkably expensive wars. And I count Viet Nam
in that category too, even though Johnson started it. Because
everybody knows Johnson did that because he was so afraid of
right-wing reaction.


:-)


Here's my favorite quote from William F. Buckley, founder of the
modern conservative movement:


“A Conservative is a fellow who is standing athwart history yelling
"Stop!"”


Just to give you an idea of the quality and depth of his opinions, he
also said (or wrote):


“The Beatles are not merely awful. They are so unbelievably horrible,
so appallingly unmusical, so dogmatically insensitive to the magic of
the art, that they qualify as crowned heads of antimusic.”


Well, at least, in this quote, he was correct, as history will (and to
a degree, already has) show(n). *Their music does not "live". *It was
a fad, was not musical, barely rhythmic, and appealed only to the
journalistic mind that believed it had found something, or to
rebellious dilatants.

cheers, anyway; and Merry Christmas

oz, who never confuses sales figures with quality

So is it the Christmas spirtit or Satan that has you by the balls?!

If this ain't talent, the GOP will, enthusiastically, support all future Dem
initiatives.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5aSs...eature=related

Jeez, he hates college sportz


Actually, he loves college sports...or, at least did when it was
sport. They should all revert to the Ivy Leage concept, leaving it
where it belongs.

and the greatest musical talent to ever grace
this godforsaken planet!


No.......I actually love Mozart and Bob Wills...........

Cheers

oz
  #10  
Old December 26th, 2009, 10:18 PM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly
Mark Bowen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 301
Default Being constent


"MajorOz" wrote in message
...
On Dec 24, 8:00 pm, "Mark Bowen" wrote:
"MajorOz" wrote in message

...
On Dec 24, 4:00 pm, " wrote:



On Dec 24, 10:50 am, sandy wrote:


I haven't participated here much--last year or so.
There was just too much political wrangling going on
and I found it too hard to ignore. So I largely took a powder.
(no not that kind. all my dollar bills are still in my wallet).


So, exhibiting typical consistency on my part, the following:


The republicans unanimously opposed historic health care
legislation today--watered down and impotent as it was, due
to their unanimous hostility for over a year now. But lose the
battle they did. Or soon will, as the senate was the only
reactionary chance left for them.


All of which reminded me:


Republicans opposed social security, originally and as recently as
a few years ago.


Republicans opposed the Marshall Plan after WWII.


In the early 50s republicans did half-heartedly supported voting
rights
for southern blacks, largely because it was Yellow Dog Dixicrats who
supported segregation. But after the civil rights bill passed and it
became clear the new wave of black voters would all vote democratic,
the republicans almost instantly switched camps and became
states-rights reactionaries. They got the Ross Barnett, Bull
Conner-like
democrats and they've controlled the redneck south ever since.


The republicans also opposed Medicare.
And now they've done absolutely everything possible to give
Health Insurance corporations the right continue ripping us off, and
to
keep upwards of 20 million citizens out of any kind of health care
luck
at all.


I'm beginning to think this kind of stubborn
resistance to needed change is a genetic condition. Rational
evaluation of the evidence just doesn't support this kind
of boneheaded behavior.


The only thing non-obstructionist they've ever done is to
drive us into near bankruptcy by slashing revenues (taxes)
and giving most of that the rich, and to start a series of
ill-advised and remarkably expensive wars. And I count Viet Nam
in that category too, even though Johnson started it. Because
everybody knows Johnson did that because he was so afraid of
right-wing reaction.


:-)


Here's my favorite quote from William F. Buckley, founder of the
modern conservative movement:


“A Conservative is a fellow who is standing athwart history yelling
"Stop!"”


Just to give you an idea of the quality and depth of his opinions, he
also said (or wrote):


“The Beatles are not merely awful. They are so unbelievably horrible,
so appallingly unmusical, so dogmatically insensitive to the magic of
the art, that they qualify as crowned heads of antimusic.”


Well, at least, in this quote, he was correct, as history will (and to
a degree, already has) show(n). Their music does not "live". It was
a fad, was not musical, barely rhythmic, and appealed only to the
journalistic mind that believed it had found something, or to
rebellious dilatants.

cheers, anyway; and Merry Christmas

oz, who never confuses sales figures with quality

So is it the Christmas spirtit or Satan that has you by the balls?!

If this ain't talent, the GOP will, enthusiastically, support all future
Dem
initiatives.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5aSs...eature=related

Jeez, he hates college sportz


Actually, he loves college sports...or, at least did when it was
sport. They should all revert to the Ivy Leage concept, leaving it
where it belongs.

and the greatest musical talent to ever grace
this godforsaken planet!


No.......I actually love Mozart and Bob Wills...........

Cheers

oz

Okay, that ain't so bad then! Mozart is good, Bob Wills is a bit before my
time, though I'm sure I'd like him--he's a Rapper, right?

MC, HH, FK, and HNY to ya Major Oz!


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 FishingBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.