Facebook ROFF

Okay fellas, this is an appeal to those who participate in Facebook or may consier participating in Facebook.

Frank R. created an Fb page for ROFF sometime back, which does not receive much attention at present. However, I believe if nothing else Frank's Fb/ROFF could assist USENET/ROFF, should the long foretold demise of USENET/ROFF come to fruition or at least serve as a place where we can post pics that might accompany our posts.

I am not proposing a mass exodus from USENET/ROFF--like that would happen--to Fb/ROFF, but merely trying to get some folk to engage in Fb/ROFF. I know that many might have security concerns with regard to Fb, but for those inclined, let's see if we can help Fb/ROFF take off.

Just like USENET/ROFF, Fb/ROFF is unmoderated (or appears to be).

Any thoughts or suggestions--other than the usual "stick it where the Sun don't shine Opie!"

Op

On 1/17/2011 10:20 AM, Mark H. Bowen wrote:

I am not proposing a mass exodus from USENET/ROFF--like that would happen-


just for starters, it would require a mass of ROFF participants........

Tom

p.s I know, mass is relative to gravity, which we have little of, but
still.....

On Jan 17, 4:14*pm, Tom Littleton wrote:
On 1/17/2011 10:20 AM, Mark H. Bowen wrote:

I am not proposing a mass exodus from USENET/ROFF--like that would happen-

just for starters, it would require a mass of ROFF participants........

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *Tom

p.s I know, mass is relative to gravity, which we have little of, but
still.....

Weight is relative to gravity. Mass is constant.....sort of.

g.
who would go into greater detail.....maybe.....if he had any
scientific training.

On Jan 17, 4:56*pm, Giles wrote:
On Jan 17, 4:14*pm, Tom Littleton wrote:

On 1/17/2011 10:20 AM, Mark H. Bowen wrote:

I am not proposing a mass exodus from USENET/ROFF--like that would happen-

just for starters, it would require a mass of ROFF participants........

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *Tom

p.s I know, mass is relative to gravity, which we have little of, but
still.....

Weight is relative to gravity. *Mass is constant.....sort of.

g.
who would go into greater detail.....maybe.....if he had any
scientific training.

Nah, my aunt had this mass and it kept getting bigger.
Frank Reid
(when will these people learn?)

"Frank Reid © 2010" wrote in message
...

On Jan 17, 4:56 pm, Giles wrote:
On Jan 17, 4:14 pm, Tom Littleton wrote:

On 1/17/2011 10:20 AM, Mark H. Bowen wrote:

I am not proposing a mass exodus from USENET/ROFF--like that would
happen-

just for starters, it would require a mass of ROFF participants........

Tom

p.s I know, mass is relative to gravity, which we have little of, but
still.....

Weight is relative to gravity. Mass is constant.....sort of.

g.
who would go into greater detail.....maybe.....if he had any
scientific training.

Nah, my aunt had this mass and it kept getting bigger.
Frank Reid
(when will these people learn?)


.....try any Holy Water on the mass?

john

On Jan 17, 6:06*pm, "john b" wrote:
"Frank Reid © 2010" *wrote in ...

On Jan 17, 4:56 pm, Giles wrote:





On Jan 17, 4:14 pm, Tom Littleton wrote:

On 1/17/2011 10:20 AM, Mark H. Bowen wrote:

I am not proposing a mass exodus from USENET/ROFF--like that would
happen-

just for starters, it would require a mass of ROFF participants.........

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *Tom

p.s I know, mass is relative to gravity, which we have little of, but
still.....

Weight is relative to gravity. *Mass is constant.....sort of.

g.
who would go into greater detail.....maybe.....if he had any
scientific training.

Nah, my aunt had this mass and it kept getting bigger.
Frank Reid

(when will these people learn?)

....try any Holy Water on the mass?

john- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Don't know if it was holy water, but she did drink alot... then we had
to rub her feet.
Frank Reid

On 2011-01-17 19:06:35 -0500, "john b" said:



"Frank Reid © 2010" wrote in message
...

On

Jan 17, 4:56 pm, Giles wrote:
On Jan 17, 4:14 pm, Tom Littleton wrote:

On 1/17/2011 10:20 AM, Mark H. Bowen wrote:

I am not proposing a mass exodus from USENET/ROFF--like that would
happen-

just for starters, it would require a mass of ROFF participants........

Tom

p.s I know, mass is relative to gravity, which we have little of, but
still.....

Weight is relative to gravity. Mass is constant.....sort of.

g.
who would go into greater detail.....maybe.....if he had any
scientific training.

Nah, my aunt had this mass and it kept getting bigger.
Frank Reid
(when will these people learn?)


....try any Holy Water on the mass?

john

Hey, I live (part time) in Mass, and the progressives hereabouts don't
allow holy water.

On Jan 17, 5:34*pm, Frank Reid © 2010 wrote:
On Jan 17, 4:56*pm, Giles wrote:





On Jan 17, 4:14*pm, Tom Littleton wrote:

On 1/17/2011 10:20 AM, Mark H. Bowen wrote:

I am not proposing a mass exodus from USENET/ROFF--like that would happen-

just for starters, it would require a mass of ROFF participants.........

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *Tom

p.s I know, mass is relative to gravity, which we have little of, but
still.....

Weight is relative to gravity. *Mass is constant.....sort of.

g.
who would go into greater detail.....maybe.....if he had any
scientific training.

Nah, my aunt had this mass and it kept getting bigger.
Frank Reid
(when will these people learn?)

"Mass" is a small town (well, actually a crossroads.....or would be,
if there were two or more roads that crossed somewhere in the general
vicinity) in da Yoop, eh? Evidently, "they" found a large chunk, or
"mass" or copper or some goddamn thing or another there. Research
suggests that no one has ever considered.....let alone
answered.....the question of whether or not it has changed in one way
or another in the ensuing years, decades, or whatever.

Whatever.

giles