![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I haven't read anything lately that scares the bejesus out of me
as much as this article from today's Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/08/education/08HOME.html -- Ken Fortenberry |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message news I haven't read anything lately that scares the bejesus out of me as much as this article from today's Times. Yeah, but the girl in the HarrisDirect ad has nice, um, features. :-) Joe F. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "rb608" wrote... "Ken Fortenberry" wrote: I haven't read anything lately that scares the bejesus out of me as much as this article from today's Times. Yeah, but the girl in the HarrisDirect ad has nice, um, features. :-) I was so turned on by the article I didn't notice. ;-) -- yfotr, Tim ------------------------ http://css.sbcma.com/timj |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ken Fortenberry wrote in
om: I haven't read anything lately that scares the bejesus out of me as much as this article from today's Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/08/education/08HOME.html Ken, you scare easy. It's what I'm not reading that scares the living **** out of me. My fear today is the lack of a media uproar demanding release of the strategic petroleum reserve. Scott |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 08 Mar 2004 21:48:29 GMT, Ken Fortenberry
wrote: I haven't read anything lately that scares the bejesus out of me as much as this article from today's Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/08/education/08HOME.html Nah, not much problem. In fact it's excellent that they're getting involved in White House politics while they're still young enough and idealistic enough to become hysterically upset when they finally notice what's really going on around them. (BTW, I'd figure the same for rabid liberal's kids who were overly into dogma when the kids got a chance to play in Democrat politics.) -- rbc:vixen,Minnow Goddess,Willow Watcher,and all that sort of thing. Often taunted by trout. Only a fool would refuse to believe in luck. Only a damn fool would rely on it. http://www.visi.com/~cyli |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, Ken Fortenberry wrote:
I haven't read anything lately that scares the bejesus out of me as much as this article from today's Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/08/education/08HOME.html There is something very un-christian about the self-segregation of home-schooling. Mu |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yep, the religious right drove me out of the Republican Party! They are
Rinos (Republicans in name only). The religious right does not embrace the traditional Republican values of fiscal conservancy and limited government intrusion. They are using the GOP to push "Jesus" on the rest of us. The religious right is no better than the Taliban. "Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message om... I haven't read anything lately that scares the bejesus out of me as much as this article from today's Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/08/education/08HOME.html -- Ken Fortenberry |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark wrote:
The religious right does not embrace the traditional Republican values of fiscal conservancy and limited government intrusion. Traditional Republican values??? Gag! Fiscal conservatism? Are you aware of which way the deficit is headed, taking Social Security along with it? The Republicans control the Presidency and Congress, but they blame the "Clinton recession," neglecting to mention that Clinton left them with a record surplus, and surpluses projected as far as the eye could see, and they squandered it on reckless tax cuts for the wealthy. When someone points this out, they scream "class warfare." I love Warren Buffet's comment: "If class warfare is being waged in America, my class is clearly winning." As for limited government intrusion, that's an even bigger joke. Are you comfortable with John Ashcroft administering the so-called Patriot Act? Now we have a Bush proposal to amend the Constitution to ban same-sex marriage, for God's sake. The Republicans try to use the Constitution to exploit wedge issues in nearly every election year. In 1980 Reagan supported an amendment to ban abortion, and this still remains in the party platform. In 1988 George H. W. Bush called for an amendment outlawing flag burning. In 1996 Bob Dole supported amendments on flag burning, school prayer, and a mandated balanced budget. (Sweet irony, there.) The 1996 party platform also called for amendments on term limits, citizenship for children of illegal aliens, and victims' rights. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 09 Mar 2004 13:03:23 -0700, rw
wrote: Mark wrote: The religious right does not embrace the traditional Republican values of fiscal conservancy and limited government intrusion. Traditional Republican values??? Gag! Once upon a time those were the cornerstones of the Republican platform. (snipped) As for limited government intrusion, that's an even bigger joke. Are you comfortable with John Ashcroft I'm not very comfortable with John Ashcroft being of the same species I am. administering the so-called Patriot Act? I wouldn't trust Mother Teresa (if she came back) to administer that Act. -- rbc:vixen,Minnow Goddess,Willow Watcher,and all that sort of thing. Often taunted by trout. Only a fool would refuse to believe in luck. Only a damn fool would rely on it. http://www.visi.com/~cyli |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|