A Fishing forum. FishingBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » FishingBanter forum » rec.outdoors.fishing newsgroups » Fly Fishing Tying
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

QUESTION: Hooks snapping on de-barb



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 20th, 2003, 07:47 AM
Hooked
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default QUESTION: Hooks snapping on de-barb

"Chas Wade" wrote in message
news
Scott Seidman wrote:


It was a barb on a #22 that got hooked in my son's eye lid and required
a doctor's help to remove. Since then I debarb everything I fish with.


So how did this hook end up there in the first place?


  #2  
Old September 21st, 2003, 07:47 AM
Chas Wade
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default QUESTION: Hooks snapping on de-barb

Scott Seidman wrote:
Chas,

I really should say absolutely nothing here, cause your boy was at
risk,
and it couldn't have been a very pleasant situation, but was your son
wearing eye protection??


It's a good enough point that I can't take offense at it. This was
about 20 years ago, and people hadn't gotten into the radical defend
the kids from everything mode yet.


When I teach in the courses, I gear up, and I ask the audience to call
out
the most important piece of gear I'm wearing. I make sure they all
understand that it's my glasses or sunglasses, and why. Next, I take
my
whistle out of my wader pocket. Then my wading staff.


I'm with you on the glasses, but I put a hat next, and don't bother
with either the whistle or the wading staff. I can yell as loud as a
whistle, and I'd just trip over the staff. I call the hat my "casting
helmet". A full brim, not a baseball cap.


Of course, your son could have caught a hook anywhere on his body, and
you
would have had a similar problem, but not as nervewracking. Hell, for
all
I know, your boy could have had a freak accident at the tying vise.


This part, though true, is irrelevant.

Chas
http://home.comcast.net/~chas.wade/w...ome.html-.html

  #3  
Old September 22nd, 2003, 01:41 PM
Scott Seidman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default QUESTION: Hooks snapping on de-barb

Chas Wade wrote in news:dQbbb.115190$mp.58539
@rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net:

Scott Seidman wrote:
Chas,

I really should say absolutely nothing here, cause your boy was at
risk,
and it couldn't have been a very pleasant situation, but was your son
wearing eye protection??


It's a good enough point that I can't take offense at it. This was
about 20 years ago, and people hadn't gotten into the radical defend
the kids from everything mode yet.


When I teach in the courses, I gear up, and I ask the audience to call
out
the most important piece of gear I'm wearing. I make sure they all
understand that it's my glasses or sunglasses, and why. Next, I take
my
whistle out of my wader pocket. Then my wading staff.


I'm with you on the glasses, but I put a hat next, and don't bother
with either the whistle or the wading staff. I can yell as loud as a
whistle, and I'd just trip over the staff. I call the hat my "casting
helmet". A full brim, not a baseball cap.


Of course, your son could have caught a hook anywhere on his body, and
you
would have had a similar problem, but not as nervewracking. Hell, for
all
I know, your boy could have had a freak accident at the tying vise.


This part, though true, is irrelevant.

Chas
http://home.comcast.net/~chas.wade/w...ome.html-.html



Chas-

Tremendously happy that you took this in the spirit with which it was
intended.

Fully agree on the staff, BTW. I use a folding one, just so I always
have it and might not trip over it. I also try to use it exclusively for
wading myself out of trouble, but the temptation is always there to wade
myself into trouble. Also, a staff is really no substitute for an
attentive wading buddy.

The whistle, though, I really push. You can yell as loudly as a whistle
can, FOR AWHILE, assuming you're not injured. For a three buck
investment and a tiny space in my vest, I'll keep carrying the whistle.

What's your son doing these days, BTW??

Scott
  #4  
Old September 22nd, 2003, 10:54 PM
Wolfgang
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default QUESTION: Hooks snapping on de-barb


"Scott Seidman" wrote in message
. 1.4...

You can yell as loudly as a whistle
can, FOR AWHILE, assuming you're not injured.....


Maybe. I remain skeptical. But volume and tenacity aren't necessarily
always the key issues, anyway. High frequency sounds carry much better
through background noise.......like rushing water, or wind in the trees.
Birds figured it out years ago. In addition, a signal note, regardless of
pitch, is much more likely to be noticed if it is of long duration. A
whistle requires relatively little air flow. It's pretty easy to hold a
note for thirty seconds or more on a whistle. Try that with a maximum
volume shout sometime.......and half a dozen or so shouts like that will
pretty much fry most people's vocal cords.

Wolfgang
tweet, tweet!


  #5  
Old September 22nd, 2003, 11:13 PM
Ernie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default QUESTION: Hooks snapping on de-barb

Wolfie.
I used to carry one of those little cans of compressed gas with the horn
on top in my fishing vest. I figured it would carry a lot further than
hollering.
Ernie

"Wolfgang" wrote in message
...

"Scott Seidman" wrote in message
. 1.4...

You can yell as loudly as a whistle
can, FOR AWHILE, assuming you're not injured.....


Maybe. I remain skeptical. But volume and tenacity aren't necessarily
always the key issues, anyway. High frequency sounds carry much better
through background noise.......like rushing water, or wind in the trees.
Birds figured it out years ago. In addition, a signal note, regardless of
pitch, is much more likely to be noticed if it is of long duration. A
whistle requires relatively little air flow. It's pretty easy to hold a
note for thirty seconds or more on a whistle. Try that with a maximum
volume shout sometime.......and half a dozen or so shouts like that will
pretty much fry most people's vocal cords.

Wolfgang
tweet, tweet!




  #8  
Old September 23rd, 2003, 01:50 PM
Scott Seidman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default QUESTION: Hooks snapping on de-barb

"Wolfgang" wrote in
:


"Scott Seidman" wrote in message
. 1.4...

You can yell as loudly as a whistle
can, FOR AWHILE, assuming you're not injured.....


Maybe. I remain skeptical. But volume and tenacity aren't
necessarily always the key issues, anyway. High frequency sounds
carry much better through background noise.......like rushing water,
or wind in the trees. Birds figured it out years ago. In addition, a
signal note, regardless of pitch, is much more likely to be noticed if
it is of long duration. A whistle requires relatively little air
flow. It's pretty easy to hold a note for thirty seconds or more on a
whistle. Try that with a maximum volume shout sometime.......and half
a dozen or so shouts like that will pretty much fry most people's
vocal cords.

Wolfgang
tweet, tweet!



Don't have to sell it to me. I'm with you. Pound for pound and dollar for
dollar, in terms of safety equipment, a whistle is a hell of a deal. I
also think that when you have a whistle, everybody around you is a little
bit safer. Let's say you use a buddy system, one buddy busts a long bone
descending a gorge-- now what. Without a whistle, there's a larger chance
that the uninjured guy will have to hike back up and get help, or carry the
breakee out of the gorge solo, but with a whistle there's a bigger chance
that help might come to you.

I'll keep promoting my whistle carry to newbies.

Scott
  #9  
Old September 23rd, 2003, 03:07 PM
Kevin Vang
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default QUESTION: Hooks snapping on de-barb

Scott Seidman wrote:

Don't have to sell it to me. I'm with you. Pound for pound and dollar for
dollar, in terms of safety equipment, a whistle is a hell of a deal.



And, as a free bonus, you can use it to call your dog.

Kevin

  #10  
Old September 23rd, 2003, 03:35 PM
slenon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default QUESTION: Hooks snapping on de-barb

I'll keep promoting my whistle carry to newbies.
Scott


I think such a small device is worth the weight. My bootlaces weigh more
than most whistles.

Two people were drowned while wade fishing local flats this weekend. One
non-swimmer was caught in the current and the second man went to his rescue.
Every time I'm out fishing I see people standing near channels submerged to
their armpits.

I don't normally wade that deep in any water. But such events make me
reconsider the purchase of an inflatable belt or suspenders.

----
Stev Lenon 91B20 '68-'69
Drowning flies to Darkstar
Save a cow, eat a PETA

http://web.tampabay.rr.com/stevglo/i...age92kword.htm



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fishing Hooks Bill Kiene Fly Fishing 23 June 30th, 2011 01:24 AM
Lanyard question Conan The Librarian Fly Fishing 14 May 13th, 2004 02:36 PM
Attention Pa Fisherman: Special Regulations change G. M. Zimmermann Fly Fishing 37 February 26th, 2004 08:07 AM
hooks gary gilman Fly Fishing 12 November 12th, 2003 09:08 AM
Tournament Question Chuck Coger Bass Fishing 7 October 1st, 2003 10:48 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 FishingBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.