A Fishing forum. FishingBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » FishingBanter forum » rec.outdoors.fishing newsgroups » Bass Fishing
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

If you had a choice



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 21st, 2004, 10:39 PM
alwaysfishking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default If you had a choice

to fish the following hours which would you do?

2:30 a.m- 5:30 a.m or 5:30 a.m- 8:a.m


The reason I ask is, I was at the lake at 5:30 this morning and prior to it getting light I caught two good fish on a buzzbait and one on a wacky rig. I missed another what seemed like a good fish based on the splash(but who knows) With the warmer temperatures earlier in the morning now it seems that once that sun comes up the fish become few and far between, I beleive I might be better off fishing in the dark right up to daybreak. I could then sleep for another two hours prior to work. Opinions? Fish should be feeding more during this time anyway right? (Wow, this sounds "Al-Esque")
Randy-
  #2  
Old July 21st, 2004, 11:42 PM
Sideshow Raheem
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default If you had a choice

I would not post in html, that's what I'd do...



"alwaysfishking" wrote in message
news to fish the following hours which would you do?

2:30 a.m- 5:30 a.m or 5:30 a.m- 8:a.m


The reason I ask is, I was at the lake at 5:30 this morning and prior to it
getting light I caught two good fish on a buzzbait and one on a wacky rig. I
missed another what seemed like a good fish based on the splash(but who
knows) With the warmer temperatures earlier in the morning now it seems that
once that sun comes up the fish become few and far between, I beleive I
might be better off fishing in the dark right up to daybreak. I could then
sleep for another two hours prior to work. Opinions? Fish should be feeding
more during this time anyway right? (Wow, this sounds "Al-Esque")
Randy-


  #3  
Old July 22nd, 2004, 02:10 AM
Bob Rickard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default If you had a choice

Sideshow, other than basic operations, I understand next to nothing about
computers. I both receive and send messages in HTML without apparent
problems to me. Do others have problems on these same messages, and if so is
there no simple solution for them? I like the flexibilities I get in sending
with HTML, so I will continue doing so if there is no good reason not to.

--
Bob Rickard
(AKA Dr. Spinnerbait)
www.secretweaponlures.com
--------------------------=x O')))


"Sideshow Raheem" wrote in message
news:ujCLc.5895$8_6.4155@attbi_s04...
I would not post in html, that's what I'd do...



"alwaysfishking" wrote in message
news to fish the following hours which would you do?

2:30 a.m- 5:30 a.m or 5:30 a.m- 8:a.m


The reason I ask is, I was at the lake at 5:30 this morning and prior to

it
getting light I caught two good fish on a buzzbait and one on a wacky rig.

I
missed another what seemed like a good fish based on the splash(but who
knows) With the warmer temperatures earlier in the morning now it seems

that
once that sun comes up the fish become few and far between, I beleive I
might be better off fishing in the dark right up to daybreak. I could then
sleep for another two hours prior to work. Opinions? Fish should be

feeding
more during this time anyway right? (Wow, this sounds "Al-Esque")
Randy-




  #4  
Old July 22nd, 2004, 02:44 AM
RichZ
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default If you had a choice

Bob,

I don't think HTML has any business on usenet. That being said, it's my
choice, so I use a news reader that understand html only enough to strip it
the hell out of messages and give me straight ascii.

RichZ©
www.richz.com/fishing

  #5  
Old July 22nd, 2004, 04:03 AM
Thundercat
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default If you had a choice

On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 21:44:26 EDT, RichZ wrote:

Bob,

I don't think HTML has any business on usenet. That being said, it's my
choice, so I use a news reader that understand html only enough to strip it
the hell out of messages and give me straight ascii.

RichZ©
www.richz.com/fishing


There are newsreaders that can't interpret html and display plain
text? Weird...
On that note, you would think someone 'savvy' enough to point out the
poor netiquette of html posting would have and equally 'savvy'
newsreader. At least I know to be careful now that I am aware that we
have our own personal USENET cop on the scene to point out that stuff.
I wouldn't want to get caught with my proverbial pants down.

M-O-O-N that spells USENET police...

Harry J aka Thundercat
Brooklyn Bill's Tackle Shop Fishing Team
http://www.geocities.com/brooklynbill2003/products.html
Share the knowledge, compete on execution.
  #6  
Old July 22nd, 2004, 04:03 AM
Thundercat
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default If you had a choice

On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 21:44:26 EDT, RichZ wrote:

Bob,

I don't think HTML has any business on usenet. That being said, it's my
choice, so I use a news reader that understand html only enough to strip it
the hell out of messages and give me straight ascii.

RichZ©
www.richz.com/fishing


There are newsreaders that can't interpret html and display plain
text? Weird...
On that note, you would think someone 'savvy' enough to point out the
poor netiquette of html posting would have and equally 'savvy'
newsreader. At least I know to be careful now that I am aware that we
have our own personal USENET cop on the scene to point out that stuff.
I wouldn't want to get caught with my proverbial pants down.

M-O-O-N that spells USENET police...

Harry J aka Thundercat
Brooklyn Bill's Tackle Shop Fishing Team
http://www.geocities.com/brooklynbill2003/products.html
Share the knowledge, compete on execution.
  #7  
Old July 22nd, 2004, 04:03 AM
Thundercat
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default If you had a choice

On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 21:44:26 EDT, RichZ wrote:

Bob,

I don't think HTML has any business on usenet. That being said, it's my
choice, so I use a news reader that understand html only enough to strip it
the hell out of messages and give me straight ascii.

RichZ©
www.richz.com/fishing


There are newsreaders that can't interpret html and display plain
text? Weird...
On that note, you would think someone 'savvy' enough to point out the
poor netiquette of html posting would have and equally 'savvy'
newsreader. At least I know to be careful now that I am aware that we
have our own personal USENET cop on the scene to point out that stuff.
I wouldn't want to get caught with my proverbial pants down.

M-O-O-N that spells USENET police...

Harry J aka Thundercat
Brooklyn Bill's Tackle Shop Fishing Team
http://www.geocities.com/brooklynbill2003/products.html
Share the knowledge, compete on execution.
  #8  
Old July 22nd, 2004, 02:43 AM
Charles B. Summers
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default If you had a choice

Bob... some people like me only receive in plain text. I set my readers up
to do that to prevent alot of the porn spam from showing their graphics when
I check my mail. It's kind of embarassing and definately inappropriate for
the kids to see some of this stuff.

Since doing so, I don't get the pics... even when someone I know and trust
sends something in html.

--
Charles Summers
Secret Weapon Lures
http://www.secretweaponlures.com
"Bob Rickard" wrote in message
om...
Sideshow, other than basic operations, I understand next to nothing about
computers. I both receive and send messages in HTML without apparent
problems to me. Do others have problems on these same messages, and if so

is
there no simple solution for them? I like the flexibilities I get in

sending
with HTML, so I will continue doing so if there is no good reason not to.

--
Bob Rickard
(AKA Dr. Spinnerbait)
www.secretweaponlures.com
--------------------------=x O')))


"Sideshow Raheem" wrote in message
news:ujCLc.5895$8_6.4155@attbi_s04...
I would not post in html, that's what I'd do...



"alwaysfishking" wrote in message
news to fish the following hours which would you do?

2:30 a.m- 5:30 a.m or 5:30 a.m- 8:a.m


The reason I ask is, I was at the lake at 5:30 this morning and prior

to
it
getting light I caught two good fish on a buzzbait and one on a wacky

rig.
I
missed another what seemed like a good fish based on the splash(but who
knows) With the warmer temperatures earlier in the morning now it seems

that
once that sun comes up the fish become few and far between, I beleive I
might be better off fishing in the dark right up to daybreak. I could

then
sleep for another two hours prior to work. Opinions? Fish should be

feeding
more during this time anyway right? (Wow, this sounds "Al-Esque")
Randy-






  #9  
Old July 22nd, 2004, 02:44 AM
RichZ
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default If you had a choice

Bob,

I don't think HTML has any business on usenet. That being said, it's my
choice, so I use a news reader that understand html only enough to strip it
the hell out of messages and give me straight ascii.

RichZ©
www.richz.com/fishing

  #10  
Old July 22nd, 2004, 02:43 AM
Charles B. Summers
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default If you had a choice

Bob... some people like me only receive in plain text. I set my readers up
to do that to prevent alot of the porn spam from showing their graphics when
I check my mail. It's kind of embarassing and definately inappropriate for
the kids to see some of this stuff.

Since doing so, I don't get the pics... even when someone I know and trust
sends something in html.

--
Charles Summers
Secret Weapon Lures
http://www.secretweaponlures.com
"Bob Rickard" wrote in message
om...
Sideshow, other than basic operations, I understand next to nothing about
computers. I both receive and send messages in HTML without apparent
problems to me. Do others have problems on these same messages, and if so

is
there no simple solution for them? I like the flexibilities I get in

sending
with HTML, so I will continue doing so if there is no good reason not to.

--
Bob Rickard
(AKA Dr. Spinnerbait)
www.secretweaponlures.com
--------------------------=x O')))


"Sideshow Raheem" wrote in message
news:ujCLc.5895$8_6.4155@attbi_s04...
I would not post in html, that's what I'd do...



"alwaysfishking" wrote in message
news to fish the following hours which would you do?

2:30 a.m- 5:30 a.m or 5:30 a.m- 8:a.m


The reason I ask is, I was at the lake at 5:30 this morning and prior

to
it
getting light I caught two good fish on a buzzbait and one on a wacky

rig.
I
missed another what seemed like a good fish based on the splash(but who
knows) With the warmer temperatures earlier in the morning now it seems

that
once that sun comes up the fish become few and far between, I beleive I
might be better off fishing in the dark right up to daybreak. I could

then
sleep for another two hours prior to work. Opinions? Fish should be

feeding
more during this time anyway right? (Wow, this sounds "Al-Esque")
Randy-






 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Line choice for beginner Mike Connor Fly Fishing 20 April 22nd, 2004 08:18 AM
Pro's Choice Lures - A Product Review Craig Baugher Bass Fishing 0 April 19th, 2004 12:38 AM
BAD CHOICE Bob La Londe Bass Fishing 1 March 15th, 2004 04:20 AM
2nd Place in Desert Bass President's Choice Today. Bob La Londe Bass Fishing 7 December 8th, 2003 10:51 PM
Search bait of choice TNBass Bass Fishing 19 November 24th, 2003 04:15 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 FishingBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.