![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "George Cleveland" I know several *excellent* fishermen who fish 5 wt. rods virtually everywhere, from the spring creeks of SW Wisconsin to the tag alder jungles up north to the smallmouth bass rivers that are everywhere up here to the big rivers in Montana. g.c. ......and a couple not so excellent fisherman who use a five weights.... john |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "asadi" wrote "George Cleveland" I know several *excellent* fishermen who fish 5 wt. rods virtually everywhere, from the spring creeks of SW Wisconsin to the tag alder jungles up north to the smallmouth bass rivers that are everywhere up here to the big rivers in Montana. g.c. .....and a couple not so excellent fisherman who use a five weights.... john True, soooo true. but I do love my 5 wt rod. ~Chad |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 30 May 2005 19:22:45 -0500, Bob Patton
wrote: Joe wrote: But do you think the shorter rod will be necessary anyway, for the places I want to fish? I cant imagine hauling a 9-footer into some of these places. I've thought about getting a second heavier and longer rod for other situations, but dont even know if I am going to like using the first one yet... The longer rod will be a little more versatile, but if you spend too much time worrying about which rod, reel, backing, line, leader, tippet, and fly to use, then you'll never get to the water and learn what this is all about in the first place. Without a little help getting started you may find yourself bewildered. I'd find a good fly shop somewhere close and get some advice there about fly selection and where to fish. And buy the rod there, too. Mail-order is fine for people who know what they want. But folks who need advice should join the local chapter of Trout Unlimited or Federation of Fly Fishers and buy their gear from somebody local. Having said all that . . . I see that Cabela's has an 8 1/2 foot 5-weight on sale for 90 bucks. I think that'd be hard to beat. Wait until you have some more experience before going for a lighter rod. Bob If you do go the Cabela's route see if you can pick up a combo with their new Prestige Plus mid-arbor reel. I received one yesterday as part of a thank you gift from a message board on which I moderate. Seems to be a very nicely put together reel for the price (for a KPOS). Silent retreive and only a very subtle click on the drag. g.c. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() George Cleveland wrote: Silent retreive and only a very subtle click on the drag. Good Lord man, a fly reel has got to make some noise! |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]() If you do go the Cabela's route see if you can pick up a combo with their new Prestige Plus mid-arbor reel. I received one yesterday as part of a thank you gift from a message board on which I moderate. Seems to be a very nicely put together reel for the price (for a KPOS). Silent retreive and only a very subtle click on the drag. Someone else warned me about the noisy Cahill reel that comes with Cabelas lowest price combo, but the Prestige Plus combo was a bit beyond my budget. After long indecision I decided to get the shorter 4 wt rod combo with CSR reel. If the CSR's suck be nice and dont tell me, presumably they are a little nicer than the Cahills though I dont know how quiet they are. I spoke with a couple local flyfishers, one said he would go with a 9 foot rod and the other said thats what he started with and he hated it, so I went with the guy who said what I wanted to hear and ordered a 7.5 footer. It'll be good enough to see if I like this ff stuff or not, I can always get another rod later. I will definitely buy my flies locally and hopefully get some more local advice along with them. I will practice with my local bluegills before taking it into the brush. I cant wait to get started! |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
George Cleveland wrote:
Who wonders how many people can *always* lay a fly down in a 6" circle at 40'. well...um... i can - it's easy...of course, i'm assuming there's no wind, a drunk front hasn't moved in, the landscape is level and unforested, the circle is well-lit or marked (orange paint works), i can use a big fly, and i can manage to walk that far...hell, i can lay a fly down in that size circle - even a smaller one - everytime! i'll be in your area in sept. and i'll show ya. da tar heel yooper tourist |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Joe" wrote in message oups.com... I am new to ff, will be ordering a Cabelas 5 piece pack rod/reel combo tomorrow. Is there anything you would recommend in flies for a beginner that I can also get from Cabelas (without spending $50, hopefully)? I will be fishing primarily small streams and brookie creeks roughly 10-30 feet wide, in northern WI and MN . I havent yet decided whether to go with a 3 or 4 wgt, although I'm leaning towards the 4 because it comes in a shorter length (7'6") and I think that will work better on the small creeks (and be easier to learn with?). Any thougts on that choice will also be appreciated though. Up to a point, longer rods are usually easier to cast. As are heavier lines (4,5,6 compared to 1,2,3) Having said that, my favorite small stream rod is a 7.5 foot 4 wt. I'd buy my flies at a shop where you can see them first. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Don Phillipson" wrote in message ... 1. When learning to cast, a longer rod is usually an easier tool. Do not try fishing in confined spaces until you cast instinctively, e.g. can place your fly on within 6 inches accuracy at a range of 40 feet without even thinking about. Um, I don't even think I can do that, and I manage to catch some fish sometimes. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Joe" wrote in message oups.com... But do you think the shorter rod will be necessary anyway, for the places I want to fish? I cant imagine hauling a 9-footer into some of these places. I've thought about getting a second heavier and longer rod for other situations, but dont even know if I am going to like using the first one yet... Sometimes the places are so tight that the longer rod is helpful because you can't make a full cast - you just sort of reach the line out there. And don't worry you don't make too many 40 foot casts on small streams. Still, a shorter rod like 7.5 feet is probably easier to maneuver on small streams. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]() jeffc wrote: Up to a point, longer rods are usually easier to cast. As are heavier lines (4,5,6 compared to 1,2,3) Having said that, my favorite small stream rod is a 7.5 foot 4 wt. I'd buy my flies at a shop where you can see them first. Thats exactly the rod I bought, a Cabelas Stowaway 4 wt 7.5' and it arrived today. I'm no expert on flyfishing but I know cheap crappy merchandise when I see it. I'm very happy to say I did not see anything of the sort when I opened my package. The rod is beautiful and seems very well-made, and the reel seems well made and is very functional (in my living room anyway). But on top of that it came with a cordura wrap with slots for each section, and two very nice cases, a tube and a pack case with handle, and a seperate paded reel case. Nothing about this package appears cheap. I am quite impressed and if it works half as well as it appears to be made, I will be very happy. Tomorrow I head to the fly shop for flies. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Dallas Tx, Fly Fishers Auction April 23rd | No left turn | Fly Fishing | 0 | April 22nd, 2005 12:16 AM |
Ugly Flies | Guy Thornberg | Fly Fishing | 11 | February 2nd, 2005 08:35 AM |
Does anyone tie or use tube flies? | Sierra fisher | Fly Fishing Tying | 2 | May 15th, 2004 11:09 PM |
Fly shop in Thailand (long0 | Joe McIntosh | Fly Fishing | 26 | December 8th, 2003 07:06 AM |
Fly shops online... | Greg LaPorta | Fly Fishing | 15 | November 3rd, 2003 09:54 PM |