Cheney shoots someone (I'm not kidding)

"Tim J." wrote



So "Republican culture of corruption" is a Bush-like mantra, right?
--


Yes it is,
and, frankly,
I'm upset with several things I see in the DemCamp including trying to use
tactics the Republicans have mastered without having the mastery. BoZo
the Dem party chairman was a huge mistake, imho, as the ONLY thing he knows
is negativity.

I'd love to find a candidate I can vote FOR, and I've said before on ROFF he
does NOT have to be a Democrat. That said, I think the last 5 years have
harmed my country more than any similar period in nearly half a century, and
I blame the people pulling Bush's strings.

I'm not anti-Republican .... but I admit 'you guys" are making it difficult
to stay that way ... I HAAVE voted for Republican, probably will again.

I saw somebody, a Rep that was the minister at Regan's funeral I think they
said, last night talking about the grave dangers we all face as a Nation,
because of Rove/et al seeing the demographic value of being 'faithful' ....
he said lots of things I agreed with, none I'd fight in a 'let's compromise'
environment, many of them 'anti this admin, but pro this country "... all
from a Republican's point of view. Let's face it, Tim, .... I admit that
the Dems have a BoZO chairman ... can you fess up to the fact that MOST
republicans are voting party line far more than what's really right? Come
on, you know it's true, don't ya?

Heah, here's another one from an interview on PBS a few days back ... it was
in my deleted files from one of the many many posts I write but never post.

On potential damages that could result from the inquiry into the NSA
surveillance, to that surveillance and to the nation, I present a Republican
:-)

"SEN. LINDSEY GRAHAM: All I can tell you is that the ultimate damage that I
want to avoid is a constitutional damage in terms of checks and balances. I
want to fight this enemy. I want to make sure our president and our military
surveils the enemy. I want to know if American citizens are collaborating
with the enemy. We can do that. We must do that.

But the biggest thing that can happen, to me, as a nation is that in the
process of fighting the enemy, we give up the processes that makes us free.

I think there is plenty of room for surveiling the enemy and providing
protections to American citizens who may be caught up in a network of
conversations. So there's a lot of harm that can come. There's two harms:
Letting the enemy know what we're doing. We need to make sure we don't do
any more of that than we have to. The other harm, equally important to me,
is that we destroy a constitutional balance that's worked for 200 years. "

Larry says, "Amen, Bro"

"Ken Fortenberry"

Yeah, but it's not like real wing shooting either if the ones
in New York state are anything like the ones here in Illinois.
Around here you pay for X amount of birds, X amount of birds
are taken out of their pens and planted in a field, and X
amount of birds are shot, one way or the other. They may as
well be fenced in for all the chance they have. I won't hunt
pheasant at one of those places.

--
I wouldn't care to either-generally. However when we lived in So.
Kalifornia I got the hots to go bird hunting- dog and all. Thus we acquired
Jack the weimereiner. Jack and I worked hard on training- as much as you
can in the city- no dizzied pigeons for instance. Finally, his first bird
season- desert quail in Kalifornia- yippee here we go! Some months later,
with torn feet, yucca plant needles firmly ensconced in our flesh, and even
waist deep snow drifts in some washes after a freak storm-I finally had to
admit that wild quail were pretty much a bull****. Jack earned his birds so
I took him to a pheasant farm so he (and I) could see what a real game bird
looked like. H earned it, we had a good day, it was fun - as a package.
Would I rather wander around natural BLM lands and hunt (introduced of
course) ringnecks-absolutely.

jh

On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:44:22 GMT, "Tom Littleton"
wrote:


"Dave LaCourse" wrote in message


snipped, yet another tedious Kerry rant

Dave,
Point 1: the election's been over for a while. Please....

Point 2: if Kerry is near Satanic in negative points, how
come he gets re-elected in YOUR home state? I mean,
Mass. is liberal in nature, but New Englanders are never
complete morons. Maybe you should spread your, er,
opinion about Kerry around home.....or, has that been
tried, and normal, rational folks just start to smell bull****,
after hearing that Kerry stuff again?

Tom

Oh, did I hurt your feelings, Tom? Golly, gee. I'll probably lose
two or three seconds of sleep over it. But, ya hafta admit, if Kerry
was hit with those pellots, he'd be hollering "PH. I wanna PH." And
if you can't stand my irony and scorn, well,...... that's just tough.

On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:54:12 GMT, "Larry L"
wrote:

MOST
republicans are voting party line far more than what's really right?

I know Republicans that held their nose and voted for Bush. If the
Democrats can put up nothing better than Al Gore or John Kerry, the
Republicans will again take the WH

John McCain will probably be the Republican Party choice in 2008. Who
can the Dems put forth to beat him?

Dave

John Hightower wrote:
"rw" wrote:
So you think that shooting 70 farm-raised pheasants is sport?

I figure its just about the same amount of "sport" as catching stocked fish.

Exactly right, John. I'll confess to having done both in
the past but given my druthers, I'd just as soon not do
either in the future. (I'll make an exception for Santeetlah,
just 'cause it's so goddamn pretty.)

--
Ken Fortenberry

Wayne Knight wrote:
Wolfgang wrote:


Let us assume that things had gone the other way around.......that Mr.
Whittington had shot Mr. Cheney......and didn't bother to tell anyone for a
day or so.......



I would say he was a humble man who wouldn't brag about his
accomplishments.


LOL!

brians

wrote in news:1139864077.212551.53550
@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:

"If Cheney now finds himself criticized or lampooned, he'll ironically
be in the same position he himself put Senator John Kerry in during the
final days of the 2004 Presidential campaign


Actually, I'm thinking that some body armor for the Iraqi troops needs to
be redirected to Cheney's hunting buddies.


--
Scott
Reverse name to reply

Dave LaCourse wrote in
:

John McCain will probably be the Republican Party choice in 2008. Who
can the Dems put forth to beat him?



Only if he can avoid hunting trips with Cheney.

--
Scott
Reverse name to reply

On 13 Feb 2006 23:17:29 GMT, Scott Seidman
wrote:

Only if he can avoid hunting trips with Cheney.

d;o)
I tried to tell Wolfgang about the jokes, but he thought I was blaming
all this on Clinton.

On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:03:34 -0500, "Mr. Opus McDopus"
wrote:

Jealousy rears it's ugly head again.

Of Kerry? Bwwwwaaaaaahahahahahahahahaha.
Liveshot John has nothing I want. Nothing!