A Fishing forum. FishingBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » FishingBanter forum » rec.outdoors.fishing newsgroups » Fly Fishing
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Pretty damn cool



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old January 11th, 2008, 04:23 PM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly, rec.outdoors.fishing.fly.tying
salmobytes
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 253
Default Pretty damn cool

On Jan 11, 9:13 am, "Wolfgang" wrote:
"salmobytes" wrote in message



We're dealing with speculation based on what appears on the screen.
Plus.....coding experience. 12 years now, since bs in cs.
  #12  
Old January 11th, 2008, 04:43 PM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly, rec.outdoors.fishing.fly.tying
Mike[_6_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,426
Default Pretty damn cool

On Jan 11, 5:23 pm, salmobytes wrote:
On Jan 11, 9:13 am, "Wolfgang" wrote:

"salmobytes" wrote in message


We're dealing with speculation based on what appears on the screen.
Plus.....coding experience. 12 years now, since bs in cs.


If you do a search on http://outdoorsbest.zeroforum.com/zeroforum?id=68
you will find the post somewhere where the guy described how he did
it, and that is was time-consuming to do. There was a short thread on
it. Some time around the beginning of last year I seem to recall.

MC
  #13  
Old January 11th, 2008, 04:51 PM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly,rec.outdoors.fishing.fly.tying
Wolfgang
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,897
Default Pretty damn cool


"salmobytes" wrote in message
...
On Jan 11, 9:13 am, "Wolfgang" wrote:
"salmobytes" wrote in message



We're dealing with speculation based on what appears on the screen.
Plus.....coding experience. 12 years now, since bs in cs.


Again, not my area of expertise. What appears on the screen that suggests
it was done other than by a simple succession of photographs?

Wolfgang


  #14  
Old January 11th, 2008, 05:14 PM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly,rec.outdoors.fishing.fly.tying
rw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,773
Default Pretty damn cool

salmobytes wrote:
On Jan 11, 9:13 am, "Wolfgang" wrote:

"salmobytes" wrote in message




We're dealing with speculation based on what appears on the screen.
Plus.....coding experience. 12 years now, since bs in cs.


Well I have a PhD in CS, so there! :-)

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.
  #15  
Old January 11th, 2008, 05:27 PM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly, rec.outdoors.fishing.fly.tying
salmobytes
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 253
Default Pretty damn cool

On Jan 11, 10:14 am, rw wrote:
salmobytes wrote:
On Jan 11, 9:13 am, "Wolfgang" wrote:


"salmobytes" wrote in message


We're dealing with speculation based on what appears on the screen.
Plus.....coding experience. 12 years now, since bs in cs.


Well I have a PhD in CS, so there! :-)

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.


A phd in cs? No wonder you're so odd! :-)


I shoot lots of fly photos. It's my hobby.
But the idea of shooting 40 frames is daunting. It would be difficult
to spin the vise in 40 even increments.

Even in the original author did do that (40 exposures) I'm thinking
he didn't have to. Software does exist, that would make it reasonable
to shoot say 8-12 exposures, and then interpolate the rest.

Hmmm. I'd love to have a few 360' fly-image rotations on my own site.
But I wouldn't even consider 40 exposures per fly. The photoshop
touchup work alone would drive me nuts.
But if I could do 8 such frames, and click a mouse to do the rest,
then I'd do it to it.

From now until the monitor still shines bright, I will click the
keyboard
no more forever (about this). It's time to tie some flies. Or shoot
some photos (and not 40 damnit).
  #16  
Old January 11th, 2008, 05:34 PM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly, rec.outdoors.fishing.fly.tying
salmobytes
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 253
Default Pretty damn cool

On Jan 11, 10:14 am, rw wrote:

Well I have a PhD in CS, so there! :-)

Does that mean you're all theory and no code?

RE "click the keyboard no more forever"
Well, I never said I wasn't.....
  #17  
Old January 11th, 2008, 05:35 PM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly,rec.outdoors.fishing.fly.tying
Larry L
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 994
Default Pretty damn cool


"salmobytes" wrote


Yes, but I doubt anybody took 40 photos.
I think they took fewer exposures, and then used software to
interpolate the intermediate frames.



I went back and looked again and I think it is "just" a lot of still photos

Using a trackball type "mouse" and being as careful as I can I get distinct
jumps and can not, ever, find a postion between those jumps.

Camera mounted on tripod, fly mounted on rotating holder, unimaginable
patience ... all it would take G


  #18  
Old January 11th, 2008, 05:35 PM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly,rec.outdoors.fishing.fly.tying
Larry L
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 994
Default Pretty damn cool


"salmobytes" wrote


Hmmm. I'd love to have a few 360' fly-image rotations on my own site.
But I wouldn't even consider 40 exposures per fly. The photoshop
touchup work alone would drive me nuts.
But if I could do 8 such frames, and click a mouse to do the rest,
then I'd do it to it.



The site has a "contact us" link .... ask em !! In my experience, people
love to talk about what they have done so you will please them asking.


  #19  
Old January 11th, 2008, 05:41 PM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly,rec.outdoors.fishing.fly.tying
rw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,773
Default Pretty damn cool

salmobytes wrote:
On Jan 11, 10:14 am, rw wrote:


Well I have a PhD in CS, so there! :-)


Does that mean you're all theory and no code?


I've coded than you can even imagine, but it's be awhile.

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.
  #20  
Old January 11th, 2008, 05:45 PM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly,rec.outdoors.fishing.fly.tying
rw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,773
Default Pretty damn cool

Larry L wrote:
"salmobytes" wrote


Hmmm. I'd love to have a few 360' fly-image rotations on my own site.
But I wouldn't even consider 40 exposures per fly. The photoshop
touchup work alone would drive me nuts.
But if I could do 8 such frames, and click a mouse to do the rest,
then I'd do it to it.




The site has a "contact us" link .... ask em !! In my experience, people
love to talk about what they have done so you will please them asking.



If you have some device to turn the base automatically, and if you have
a camera that takes sequences, it should be a piece of cake.

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OT pretty cool site snakefiddler Fly Fishing 4 January 24th, 2005 03:28 PM
DAMN! Guyz-N-Flyz Fly Fishing 6 December 27th, 2004 09:04 PM
damn, this is fun snakefiddler Fly Fishing 0 July 24th, 2004 04:01 PM
OT pretty cool Larry L Fly Fishing 6 April 1st, 2004 03:58 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 FishingBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.