![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "salmobytes" wrote Yes, but I doubt anybody took 40 photos. I think they took fewer exposures, and then used software to interpolate the intermediate frames. I went back and looked again and I think it is "just" a lot of still photos Using a trackball type "mouse" and being as careful as I can I get distinct jumps and can not, ever, find a postion between those jumps. Camera mounted on tripod, fly mounted on rotating holder, unimaginable patience ... all it would take G |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "salmobytes" wrote Hmmm. I'd love to have a few 360' fly-image rotations on my own site. But I wouldn't even consider 40 exposures per fly. The photoshop touchup work alone would drive me nuts. But if I could do 8 such frames, and click a mouse to do the rest, then I'd do it to it. The site has a "contact us" link .... ask em !! In my experience, people love to talk about what they have done so you will please them asking. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
salmobytes wrote:
On Jan 11, 10:14 am, rw wrote: Well I have a PhD in CS, so there! :-) Does that mean you're all theory and no code? I've coded than you can even imagine, but it's be awhile. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry L wrote:
"salmobytes" wrote Hmmm. I'd love to have a few 360' fly-image rotations on my own site. But I wouldn't even consider 40 exposures per fly. The photoshop touchup work alone would drive me nuts. But if I could do 8 such frames, and click a mouse to do the rest, then I'd do it to it. The site has a "contact us" link .... ask em !! In my experience, people love to talk about what they have done so you will please them asking. If you have some device to turn the base automatically, and if you have a camera that takes sequences, it should be a piece of cake. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
rw wrote:
salmobytes wrote: On Jan 11, 10:14 am, rw wrote: Well I have a PhD in CS, so there! :-) Does that mean you're all theory and no code? I've coded than you can even imagine, but it's be awhile. "been" awhile. I'm a sucky typist. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "salmobytes" wrote Hmmm. I'd love to have a few 360' fly-image rotations on my own site. But I wouldn't even consider 40 exposures per fly. The photoshop touchup work alone would drive me nuts. But if I could do 8 such frames, and click a mouse to do the rest, then I'd do it to it. It occurs to me that the 'function' is to let the viewer see all the important aspects and views of the fly. That function could be well served with 8 shots ... either presented as separate stills or in a Flash 'movie' with mouse position controlling the view shown. This 'form' of presentation wouldn't be as eye-catchingly cool but it would be far better than the standard fly photo and give admirers the visual information they need to appreciate and duplicate a pattern. Just a thought from Larry L ( a "Form Follows Function" kinda guy ) |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 11, 10:35 am, "Larry L" wrote:
Using a trackball type "mouse" and being as careful as I can I get distinct jumps and can not, ever, find a postion between those jumps. What Sandy is proposing would still have jumps, although why stop at 40 pics if all you have to do is click a mouse? ;-) If you look at some of the other flies, there are pretty big exposure jumps between some successive images, as well as focusing changes. That wouldn't happen with interpolation. E.g, choose "Peter Koga", "Steelhead 1", and make the fly face directly away from you. Then rotate it counter clockwise (as viewed from above) and watch the next 4-5 images. Jon. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 11, 12:20 pm, wrote:
Ok, you must be right about how it *was* done. ......makes sents after all :-) |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
salmobytes wrote:
On Jan 11, 12:20 pm, wrote: Ok, you must be right about how it *was* done. .....makes sents after all :-) I think this may be the way he did it. http://www.yofla.com/flash/3d-rotate/ -- Don`t Worry, Be Happy Sandy -- E-Mail:- Website:- http://www.ftscotland.co.uk Looking for a webhost? Try http://www.1and1.co.uk/?k_id=2966019 Fishing Wild at http://www.wild-fishing-scotland.co.uk/ |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 11, 12:53 pm, "Sandy Birrell" wrote:
salmobytes wrote: On Jan 11, 12:20 pm, wrote: Ok, you must be right about how it *was* done. .....makes sents after all :-) I think this may be the way he did it. http://www.yofla.com/flash/3d-rotate/ -- Don`t Worry, Be Happy Sandy -- E-Mail:- Website:- http://www.ftscotland.co.uk Looking for a webhost? Tryhttp://www.1and1.co.uk/?k_id=2966019 Fishing Wild athttp://www.wild-fishing-scotland.co.uk/ Ah ha! Now that makes cents. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pretty damn cool | Larry L | Fly Fishing | 29 | January 14th, 2008 01:59 PM |
OT pretty cool site | snakefiddler | Fly Fishing | 4 | January 24th, 2005 03:28 PM |
DAMN! | Guyz-N-Flyz | Fly Fishing | 6 | December 27th, 2004 09:04 PM |
OT pretty cool | Larry L | Fly Fishing | 6 | April 1st, 2004 03:58 AM |