So, OK, he's for change, he gives Chris Mathews a feeling "up his leg," and...

On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 14:04:50 GMT, "rb608"
wrote:

Get rid of them how? He can't fire them if they're volunteers. How could
McCain or any other candidate inspect the personal spaces or vouch for
uniformity of thought for every one of his supporters?

In this time of easy communications, I am sure either of them could
find a way. For starters, wouldn't it be nice if Obama told his
Houston office to remove the poster? A simple mandate, "Do not
embarass me," should suffice. I am not saying that Obama is praising
Guevara, but his *people* are. He should be able to control that. If
not, how in the hell is he going to run a *country* if he can't run a
simple campaign office?

Dave

On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 10:23:19 -0600, wrote:

just what kind of pol
is this sumbitch, what did that piece of **** Kennedy get out of the
deal, and just bad is it gonna wind up ****ing _me_?

Exactamundo. buzzer

"We have a winner in the balcony, Doctor."

Dave

"Dave LaCourse" wrote in message
...
Tom, given the choice, most folks couldn't vote for Kerry.

assuming 'most' to mean 51%, you are correct.
Tom

.....still, I don't think they were right to do so. A message should have
been sent at that point in the Bush presidency.

"Bob Weinberger" wrote in
news:ilItj.3757$FK2.698@trndny08:

Try substituting any of the following words for "recovering
alcoholics" in your above statement and please explain to me how the
changed statement is any less valid than your original:


Your absolutely right. Watch any of those (us) folks run for pres, and
lets see what happens
--
Scott
Reverse name to reply

Ken Fortenberry wrote in news:QyWtj.679
:

No matter how many times the Swiftboating of Kerry is proven
to be a pack of despicable lies some wingnuts will repeat it
as truth anyway.

Let alone the swiftboating of McCain. We've yet to see how letting the
Bush team roll all over him will impact his electability.

--
Scott
Reverse name to reply

Dave LaCourse wrote in
:

Tom, that Gore
should never have lost in 2000. If he had carried his homestate, he
would have won.


If Bush carried Florida, he would have won.

--
Scott
Reverse name to reply

On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 02:07:30 -0500, "Opus--Mark H. Bowen"
wrote:

This is not a difficult question, but if you are going to continue to
"Swiftboat" Kerry, you should at least be able to provide the evidence.

Where did I say anything about *Swiftboats", Mark? I am talking about
is lying, under oath, before congress, while still in uniform. I am
talking about his trip to Paris to meet secretly with the deligation
from North Viet Nam, while still in uniform. Both actions gave
comfort and support to our enemy. The man did not receive an
honorable discharge from the Navy (which has nothing to do with
treason, but *does* speak volumes of his character).

Davie

funny, the Fox link doesn't work, and there is an obvious disclaimer that
the office pictured is not affiliated with the campaign of Obama. Sounds
like the BS machine is trying to start up anew against Obama from the right,
but I think they might find his people ready to deal with it better than
Kerry did......
Tom

"Dave LaCourse" wrote in message
...
not, how in the hell is he going to run a *country* if he can't run a
simple campaign office?

Dave


the website clearly states(Fox website) that the office pictured WAS NOT a
campaign office, but merely belonged to a group of folks who volunteered to
work on his campaign. Spare me a leader who would be control freak enough to
tell those who support him on general principles HOW to think. We've seen
enough of that sort of all or nothing political thought, IMO.
Tom

Dave LaCourse wrote in
:

Both actions gave
comfort and support to our enemy.

So did the US evacuation of the Bin Laden family when every other
nonmilitary flight was grounded.


--
Scott
Reverse name to reply