![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://www.bostonherald.com/news/reg...s_ Uzi_death/
Lessee here - an 8-year-old boy is dead, having shot himself with an out-of-control full-auto Uzi, and the local DA is wondering if anyone might have been negligent...uh, ya think? While I firmly believe that gun ownership, in general, is a Constitutionally-protected individual right in the US, I'm pretty sure it doesn't apply to allowing preteens to operate full-auto close-quarters combat weapons. What possible defense to criminal negligence could a parent or instructor possibly have to allowing a 8 YO child to even handle such a weapon with a loaded magazine, much less fire the ****ing thing? And for those that don't know (probably most readers), a Micro Uzi on full-auto is difficult to control for an untrained adult of average strength and weighs considerably more than the average pistol or revolver. I have experience with ones in all of the available calibers, including while fitted with sub-caliber training devices (.22), and I would say that there is no way whatsoever that a child could possibly fire any of them safely while on full-auto. Such a firearm is not a target pistol nor a "plinking" firearm, it is purely and exactly what it was designed to be: a weapon, and children have no business whatsoever even handling such weapons, to say nothing of actually firing the thing. A sad sheesh, R ....and yeah, the father, the (alleged) "instructor" and anyone else involved in allowing this tragedy deserve some jail time, with the alleged "instructor" never being allow to so much a touch a firearm ever again or "supervise" anyone else doing so... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, yeah. The whole effin state is stooopid.
Why just yesterday it was revealed that a State Senator, one Diane Wilkerson, was arrested for bribery. The papers had pictures of her stuffing bribe money into her bra. Uh, one has to ask: How much money will a bra hold? Somewhere in the vicinity of $23,000. This is the same "legislator" that was found guilty of not paying income taxes a few years ago. And yet....... she keeps getting reelected. Yeah, people in Boston are stoopid. You should see the latest Barney Frank commercial. Pathetic! He talks like he has a mouth full of dick...... oooops, wait a minute...... he does! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:55:44 -0400, Dave LaCourse
wrote: Well, yeah. The whole effin state is stooopid. Why just yesterday it was revealed that a State Senator, one Diane Wilkerson, was arrested for bribery. The papers had pictures of her stuffing bribe money into her bra. Uh, one has to ask: How much money will a bra hold? Somewhere in the vicinity of $23,000. This is the same "legislator" that was found guilty of not paying income taxes a few years ago. And yet....... she keeps getting reelected. Yeah, people in Boston are stoopid. You should see the latest Barney Frank commercial. Pathetic! He talks like he has a mouth full of dick...... oooops, wait a minute...... he does! What in hell does Frank being gay have to do with letting a child fire a Micro Uzi and being stupid? Sheesh, part deux, R |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave LaCourse wrote:
Well, yeah. The whole effin state is stooopid. snip You should see the latest Barney Frank commercial. Pathetic! ... Hell, you should move to Germany and hang out with The Loony, you sound just like him. And yes, it is pathetic. -- Ken Fortenberry |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 29, 8:43*pm, wrote:
http://www.bostonherald.com/news/reg...28_DA:_Crimina... Lessee here - an 8-year-old boy is dead, having shot himself with an out-of-control full-auto Uzi, and the local DA is wondering if anyone might have been negligent...uh, ya think? While I firmly believe that gun ownership, in general, is a Constitutionally-protected individual right in the US, I'm pretty sure it doesn't apply to allowing preteens to operate full-auto close-quarters combat weapons. *What possible defense to criminal negligence could a parent or instructor possibly have to allowing a 8 YO child to even handle such a weapon with a loaded magazine, much less fire the ****ing thing? And for those that don't know (probably most readers), a Micro Uzi on full-auto is difficult to control for an untrained adult of average strength and weighs considerably more than the average pistol or revolver. *I have experience with ones in all of the available calibers, including while fitted with sub-caliber training devices (.22), and I would say that there is no way whatsoever that a child could possibly fire any of them safely while on full-auto. *Such a firearm is not a target pistol nor a "plinking" firearm, it is purely and exactly what it was designed to be: a weapon, and children have no business whatsoever even handling such weapons, to say nothing of actually firing the thing. A sad sheesh, R ...and yeah, the father, the (alleged) "instructor" and anyone else involved in allowing this tragedy deserve some jail time, with the alleged "instructor" never being allow to so much a touch a firearm ever again or "supervise" anyone else doing so... It ain't just Bostonians (wait, that didn't come out right...) Stoopid people aren't just in Boston... http://tinyurl.com/6obk3t --riverman |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 06:55:52 -0700 (PDT), riverman
wrote: On Oct 29, 8:43*pm, wrote: http://www.bostonherald.com/news/reg...28_DA:_Crimina... Lessee here - an 8-year-old boy is dead, having shot himself with an out-of-control full-auto Uzi, and the local DA is wondering if anyone might have been negligent...uh, ya think? While I firmly believe that gun ownership, in general, is a Constitutionally-protected individual right in the US, I'm pretty sure it doesn't apply to allowing preteens to operate full-auto close-quarters combat weapons. *What possible defense to criminal negligence could a parent or instructor possibly have to allowing a 8 YO child to even handle such a weapon with a loaded magazine, much less fire the ****ing thing? And for those that don't know (probably most readers), a Micro Uzi on full-auto is difficult to control for an untrained adult of average strength and weighs considerably more than the average pistol or revolver. *I have experience with ones in all of the available calibers, including while fitted with sub-caliber training devices (.22), and I would say that there is no way whatsoever that a child could possibly fire any of them safely while on full-auto. *Such a firearm is not a target pistol nor a "plinking" firearm, it is purely and exactly what it was designed to be: a weapon, and children have no business whatsoever even handling such weapons, to say nothing of actually firing the thing. A sad sheesh, R ...and yeah, the father, the (alleged) "instructor" and anyone else involved in allowing this tragedy deserve some jail time, with the alleged "instructor" never being allow to so much a touch a firearm ever again or "supervise" anyone else doing so... It ain't just Bostonians (wait, that didn't come out right...) Stoopid people aren't just in Boston... http://tinyurl.com/6obk3t This is nothing like _an adult_ firing a revolver and having the barrel hit them in the head due to recoil. Aside from it being an adult, the weapon the child fired was still firing when the recoil from the first shot caused the muzzle flip - and the potential for something like this was made it so stupid and dangerous. In your video link, by the time that woman got hit with the muzzle, that bullet was _LONG_ gone. In this case, it is difficult for an untrained adult to fire a weapon such as a Micro Uzi (or 9mm/,45 cal. Ingram or other such machine pistol) as a handheld and keep the muzzle on-target/downrange. It would be essentially impossible for an 8 YO child to do so, so IOW, the potential for the second and subsequent fired bullets to go "off-target" was so high as to be a virtual certainty, whether or not anyone was killed or injured. To allow any untrained person to fire such a weapon is stupid and negligent. And considering that "grip-squeezing" the trigger would produce a burst of several rounds (depending on the exact configuration, it fires about 25-30 rounds a second), allowing a child to fire _this particular weapon_ is incredibly stupid and IMO, absolutely criminally negligent. TC, R --riverman |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Without commenting specifically on Richard's comments, or the event in
quoted article, I want to educate you on some geography. There's nothing 'Boston' about this story except that the article was in a Boston newspaper. The event took place in the town of Westfield, 100 miles west of Boston in Hampden County (where I live). |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Boston Whalers - To buy or not to buy. | Jon | General Discussion | 2 | March 14th, 2007 11:33 PM |
OT - friggin amateurs | Jarmo Hurri | Fly Fishing | 0 | October 7th, 2005 08:26 PM |
fishing in or near Boston MA. | simon | General Discussion | 1 | June 2nd, 2005 12:27 AM |