Uh-oh, here we go again...

http://www.time.com/time/specials/pa...947251,00.html

....didn't ANYONE learn ANYTHING from the last time they began deifying the Fed
chairman...and assuming for the sake of argument that he is particularly
competent, why is it that a bureaucrat who does a good job deserves this kind of
recognition...I mean, geez, didn't Tiger keep at least 14 women happy (granted,
apparently one more was pretty ****ed, but still...), Paris Hilton didn't show
her money-maker even once, no one in any Congressional district hit their
Congressperson with a metal church (granted, they elected 'em, either directly
or indirectly...), and Obama was, well, he was hisownself...surely there was a
better choice...

HTH,
R

wrote:
http://www.time.com/time/specials/pa...947251,00.html

...didn't ANYONE learn ANYTHING from the last time they began deifying the Fed
chairman...

Poor dear, passed over by the Nobel committee and now this.
No need to get all jealous and angry, you just keep plugging
away, one of these years everyone will come to their senses
and you'll get what you deserve.

--
Ken Fortenberry

On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 08:57:32 -0600, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:

wrote:
http://www.time.com/time/specials/pa...947251,00.html

...didn't ANYONE learn ANYTHING from the last time they began deifying the Fed
chairman...

Poor dear, passed over by the Nobel committee and now this.
No need to get all jealous and angry, you just keep plugging
away, one of these years everyone will come to their senses
and you'll get what you deserve.

So, that's Ken Fortenberry in the "yahoo!" column for Bush appointees...

Good job, Brownnosie,
R