A Fishing forum. FishingBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » FishingBanter forum » rec.outdoors.fishing newsgroups » Fly Fishing
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

berkely and Stren Flourocarbon



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 4th, 2004, 08:28 AM
Steve Sullivan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default berkely and Stren Flourocarbon

I have noticed these two are very inexpensive. Maxima 4 lb mono was
around $2 for 27 yards, and berkely vanish was about $4.50 for 100
yards. In my mind that makes the berkely flouro cheaper than mono, yet
flouro is supposed to be so much more money??
  #2  
Old June 4th, 2004, 02:33 PM
George Cleveland
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default berkely and Stren Flourocarbon

On Fri, 04 Jun 2004 07:28:14 GMT, Steve Sullivan
wrote:

I have noticed these two are very inexpensive. Maxima 4 lb mono was
around $2 for 27 yards, and berkely vanish was about $4.50 for 100
yards. In my mind that makes the berkely flouro cheaper than mono, yet
flouro is supposed to be so much more money??



When I was in Maine a couple years ago the guy at the Dover fly shop
set me up with a 100 yard spool of Berkley flouro to use as my striper
leader. And you're right, it did cost about half as much as the 30
yard spools of "fly fishing" flouro tippet material.


g.c.
  #5  
Old June 4th, 2004, 06:22 PM
Cornmuse
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default berkely and Stren Flourocarbon


" Steve Sullivan wrote: "In my mind that makes the berkely
flouro cheaper than mono, yet flouro is supposed to be so much more money??"

I've been using Vanish as a tippet material for three years now. It is,
indeed, much less expensive than most other tippet choices. There is an
on-line e-zine that did a comparison and the Vanish didn't stand up well to
the likes of Frog Hair and Seaguar flourocarbon, but it is about 1/10 the
price. That said, the review mentions that Vanish has a tendency to slip or
break at knots. This is true in my experience. You must be very deliberate
in tying your knots.

I use the Vanish for anything sub-surface. Like all flourocarbons it will
sink a dry fly. It is heavier than water. I use mostly 4lb, 6lb, 8lb and
10lb for streamer and nymph fishing and, for the most part, like it a lot.
In situations where I need supple material I use Orvis Superstrong (an
excellent tippet material IMHO) and also for dry flies and deer hair bugs.

YMMV

JC



  #6  
Old June 4th, 2004, 08:00 PM
Sierra fisher
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default berkely and Stren Flourocarbon

Yes fluor. will sink a dry fly..eventually. However, I have been taught
that a sunk tippet is much more difficult for the fish to see than one in
the film. some years ago, our FF club had a visitor from England who was
some sort of fishing champ, and he recommended sinking the tippet, at least
just before the fly. He recommended putting Sink or some other surface
tension reducer on 3 or 4 inches of the tippetj ust before the fly. I'm a
bit lazy so I fish mostly parachutes that don't sink easily, and fluoro
tippet. I don't find that sinking the fly is a problem, but that is also
partly a function of how I fish dry flies; I don't strip them, and recast a
lot.

--


---------------------------------------------------------------------
"Are you still wasting your time with spam?...
There is a solution!"

Protected by GIANT Company's Spam Inspector
The most powerful anti-spam software available.
http://mail.spaminspector.com


"Cornmuse" wrote in message
news

" Steve Sullivan wrote: "In my mind that makes the berkely
flouro cheaper than mono, yet flouro is supposed to be so much more
money??"

I've been using Vanish as a tippet material for three years now. It is,
indeed, much less expensive than most other tippet choices. There is an
on-line e-zine that did a comparison and the Vanish didn't stand up well

to
the likes of Frog Hair and Seaguar flourocarbon, but it is about 1/10 the
price. That said, the review mentions that Vanish has a tendency to slip

or
break at knots. This is true in my experience. You must be very

deliberate
in tying your knots.

I use the Vanish for anything sub-surface. Like all flourocarbons it will
sink a dry fly. It is heavier than water. I use mostly 4lb, 6lb, 8lb and
10lb for streamer and nymph fishing and, for the most part, like it a lot.
In situations where I need supple material I use Orvis Superstrong (an
excellent tippet material IMHO) and also for dry flies and deer hair bugs.

YMMV

JC





  #7  
Old June 5th, 2004, 12:05 AM
Stephen Welsh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default berkely and Stren Flourocarbon

Steve Sullivan wrote in news:none-D2815F.00285704062004
@news.sf.sbcglobal.net:

yet
flouro is supposed to be so much more money??


There are flouros and there are flouros. Some are flouro coated mono
(usually the cheaper ones) while others are flouro through and through.

I use the Berkely a lot ... from 4 - 12 lb in fresh and sal****er, dry flys
(to a point) and wet.

Steve
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Berkley buys Stren? Charles Summers Bass Fishing 14 February 28th, 2004 12:46 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 FishingBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.