OT Breck Boy

In article om,
lid says...
I think you overstate the importance of the vice-president on the race.
I don't believe there are that many who would vote for Kerry-Edwards
but would not vote for Kerry-Gephardt. Recent history has shown that
the vice-president is of little importance. Hell, Bush pere won with
that blithering moron Dan Quayle as his running mate. The last time a
vice-president actually affected the outcome of a presidential race was
in 1960 when LBJ delivered Texas for Kennedy.

HEY! You've been reading the same web pages I have.....CNN/Time I
think. Better watch it or Wolfie will get all foaming at the mouth
again with that whole plagiarism thing. :-)
- Ken

wrote:
lid says...

I think you overstate the importance of the vice-president on the race.
I don't believe there are that many who would vote for Kerry-Edwards
but would not vote for Kerry-Gephardt. Recent history has shown that
the vice-president is of little importance. Hell, Bush pere won with
that blithering moron Dan Quayle as his running mate. The last time a
vice-president actually affected the outcome of a presidential race was
in 1960 when LBJ delivered Texas for Kennedy.


HEY! You've been reading the same web pages I have.....CNN/Time I
think.

No, I didn't read either of those. I DID read the Times this
morning.

Better watch it or Wolfie will get all foaming at the mouth
again with that whole plagiarism thing. :-)

Isn't he just the cutest little thing when he gets all rabid
like that ? ;-)

--
Ken Fortenberry

Greg Pavlov wrote in
:

On 7 Jul 2004 15:56:42 GMT, Scott Seidman
wrote:


Once again, I will be amused when he does jail time.

Do you think that will ever happen ?


yes.

BTW, I have a Blind Blake cd for you-- just send along a mailing addy

Scott

Greg Pavlov wrote in
:

On 7 Jul 2004 15:56:42 GMT, Scott Seidman
wrote:


Once again, I will be amused when he does jail time.

Do you think that will ever happen ?


yes.

BTW, I have a Blind Blake cd for you-- just send along a mailing addy

Scott

On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 10:56:38 -0500, Conan the Librarian
wrote:

Scott Seidman wrote:

It gets pretty interesting. The R's lack a bulldog who is without sin--not
that this prevented D'Amato from keeping Whitewater going.

But they have a lapdog with no sense of shame on the radio for three
hours a day.

Um, Chuck, with only that statement to go on, "they" covers quite a bit
of ground..."they" all have Presidential candidates, too...

TC,
R


Chuck Vance

On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 05:04:39 GMT, "B J Conner"
wrote:


wrote in message
.. .


Well, EXACTLY!! Now, if you could just get Edwards to point all of this
out and do it soon (or hell, Cheney, it'd be just as fun...er, good...),
the American taxpayer could save quite a bit on campaign funding...it's
your duty, man! I hereby ask that you live up to your civic
responsibility, call the Kerry campaign, and explain all of this to
them.

And if you don't, no fair bitching later..."ask for not wahtt do Kountry
for but kountry you due dew for what kan kan!" And I mean that, BJ -
you're obviously one hell of an American...if I may ask, from what
glorious institution did you matriculate?

I salute you, sir!
R
But watch the mule-pyres, or you'll have PETAnistas after ya like flies
(OBROFF) on ****...

The Kerry campaign and most non-aggies know it. Get someone to read you
Maureen Dowds column of early last month, the subject was the emperors new
cloths. It's not that I'm so smart it's that you're kind of dense. It's
hard to get the facts straight when your drinking the cool aide and rolling
in the money you make selling them Peter Piper pickle slices to Halliburton.


ASTOUNDING! You've done it again! Right to the core issues! BJ, IMO,
YOU ought to be running the Kerry campaign! Them Peter Piper pickles
are just the things the American voter NEEDS to hear Kerry and Edwards
talking about. I mean, the Peter Piper Pickle Reform Platform - it just
rolls off the tongue. And again, sir, I salute you!

Oh, by-the-by, if I find someone to read Dowd's column to me, will it
also enable them to explain to me just what the **** you are babbling
about?

Oh, wait...are you saying that Peter Piper had a predicament and was in
a pickle, picking unpickled possible prentice prospects promoted
post-primarily to a possible Presidential posting, provided the primary
pickle, Peter Piper, principle, was prohibited, proscribed, or
prevented, perhaps posthumously, from primarily and proactively
predicating Presidentially...

I LIKE IT! That should be your proposed campaign slogan to the Kerry
people: "Vote for Pickle-boy and he'll put 57 kinds of sauce on every
table"

On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 05:04:39 GMT, "B J Conner"
wrote:


wrote in message
.. .


Well, EXACTLY!! Now, if you could just get Edwards to point all of this
out and do it soon (or hell, Cheney, it'd be just as fun...er, good...),
the American taxpayer could save quite a bit on campaign funding...it's
your duty, man! I hereby ask that you live up to your civic
responsibility, call the Kerry campaign, and explain all of this to
them.

And if you don't, no fair bitching later..."ask for not wahtt do Kountry
for but kountry you due dew for what kan kan!" And I mean that, BJ -
you're obviously one hell of an American...if I may ask, from what
glorious institution did you matriculate?

I salute you, sir!
R
But watch the mule-pyres, or you'll have PETAnistas after ya like flies
(OBROFF) on ****...

The Kerry campaign and most non-aggies know it. Get someone to read you
Maureen Dowds column of early last month, the subject was the emperors new
cloths. It's not that I'm so smart it's that you're kind of dense. It's
hard to get the facts straight when your drinking the cool aide and rolling
in the money you make selling them Peter Piper pickle slices to Halliburton.


ASTOUNDING! You've done it again! Right to the core issues! BJ, IMO,
YOU ought to be running the Kerry campaign! Them Peter Piper pickles
are just the things the American voter NEEDS to hear Kerry and Edwards
talking about. I mean, the Peter Piper Pickle Reform Platform - it just
rolls off the tongue. And again, sir, I salute you!

Oh, by-the-by, if I find someone to read Dowd's column to me, will it
also enable them to explain to me just what the **** you are babbling
about?

Oh, wait...are you saying that Peter Piper had a predicament and was in
a pickle, picking unpickled possible prentice prospects promoted
post-primarily to a possible Presidential posting, provided the primary
pickle, Peter Piper, principle, was prohibited, proscribed, or
prevented, perhaps posthumously, from primarily and proactively
predicating Presidentially...

I LIKE IT! That should be your proposed campaign slogan to the Kerry
people: "Vote for Pickle-boy and he'll put 57 kinds of sauce on every
table"

William Claspy wrote in message ...

On the Case Western Reserve University campus. Should be... Interesting.

Cool. When I was an undergrad there, then presidential candidate
Gary Hart came and spoke. He was boring. It was about a week or two
later that his scandal broke...

Jon.

Jon Cook writes:

Cool. When I was an undergrad there, then presidential candidate
Gary Hart came and spoke. He was boring. It was about a week or two
later that his scandal broke...


I had a martini with Hart at the Anerican bar in the Savoy Hotel on the Strand
in London, 1989. The martini was good. He was boring.

It would be impossible for Cheney to do jail-time: first, his ilk don't
have to do jail-time, second, he would be pardoned of all his criminal
activities by Bush (much like Clinton did for on of his buddies; and third,
Cheney will drop out very shortly and McCain will take his place!

Mark --still a psychotic-psychic--
"Scott Seidman" wrote in message
.4...
Conan the Librarian wrote in
:

Scott Seidman wrote:

It gets pretty interesting. The R's lack a bulldog who is without
sin--not that this prevented D'Amato from keeping Whitewater going.

But they have a lapdog with no sense of shame on the radio for
three
hours a day.


Chuck Vance


Once again, I will be amused when he does jail time.

Scott