![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
New at this, and would like to see a discussion on the subject of "playing a fish" when flyfishing for trout. For "typical" sized New England trout, e.g. rainbows and brookies, do you folks literally just haul them in (certainly no problem in overpowering them even with very thin tippet sizes), or do you like to "play" them some, and tire them a bit, before landing them. Which is better for the fish' chance of surviving ? Do you wait until you have a real large sized trout on before "playing him" off the reel, some ? How large ? Very interested in the techniques for this used by others. Thanks, B. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob wrote:
... Very interested in the techniques for this used by others. It's not the size of the fish in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the fish. In other words, it all depends. ;-) In general bring the fish to hand or net as quickly as possible. There are times when your equipment is overmatched for one reason or another, strong current, big fish, strong fish, foul hooked, in which case you point the rod tip straight at the fish and break him off rather than continuing a battle that might prove fatal to the fish. For the kind of fishing you describe this will hardly ever be an issue unless you're using a 1wt or a 2wt. On the other hand, I try to get every fish, no matter how small, on the reel instead of just pulling them in by hand which would probably be a little quicker. It just seems like the honorable thing to do. -- Ken Fortenberry |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bob" wrote in message om... Hi, New at this, and would like to see a discussion on the subject of "playing a fish" when flyfishing for trout. For "typical" sized New England trout, e.g. rainbows and brookies, do you folks literally just haul them in (certainly no problem in overpowering them even with very thin tippet sizes), or do you like to "play" them some, and tire them a bit, before landing them. Which is better for the fish' chance of surviving ? Do you wait until you have a real large sized trout on before "playing him" off the reel, some ? How large ? Very interested in the techniques for this used by others. The bottom line is whether or not you are going to catch and release or not. If you're planning to release them, the rule of thumb is to get them in and off as quickly as possible, but this is often tempered by how bored you are from a long, dry spell of no fish. If I get a New England sized fish (10-14 inches) on, and I've been catching them regularly, I'll have that little guy off the hook in under a minute...drag him in, grab the hook (without touching the fish), and twist it loose while holding him at the surface of the water, if possible. No net, no hands, bye bye fish. If, on the other hand, I haven't caught anything for several hours, I might let him tug the line for 5 seconds or so, reel him in closer, let him tug a bit, then reel him in and release him. But he inevitably has the strength to take off immediately. OTOH, I've seen 4-5 pound trout fight like banshees for several minutes, making several (4, 5 or more) runs almost to the backing, finally getting dragged in on their sides when they were too tired to fart, and then be held out of the water for 1-2 minutes while we tried to get the hook out of their mouth from them swallowing it beyond the knot. Then have them be held in the air for another 15-30 seconds while we untangled them from the net, fiddled with the camera, posed and took the shot, then finally (FINALLY) placed them back in the water, looking pretty well stunned. They would sit at our ankles wondering what the hell hit them for about 5 minutes, then disappear with a snap of their tail. Current wisdom says that large fish are a LOT more resiliant than we give them credit for, although I don't think this is true for smaller ones or stockies. And there is also evidence that tortured fish like the aforementioned often end up dying later in the day from the lactic acid buildup from their workout. So if you intend to release them, play with them like you'd play with an egg...gently and with caution, and get them released as quickly as is reasonable. --riverman |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bob" wrote in message om... Hi, New at this, and would like to see a discussion on the subject of "playing a fish" when flyfishing for trout. For "typical" sized New England trout, e.g. rainbows and brookies, do you folks literally just haul them in (certainly no problem in overpowering them even with very thin tippet sizes), or do you like to "play" them some, and tire them a bit, before landing them. Which is better for the fish' chance of surviving ? Do you wait until you have a real large sized trout on before "playing him" off the reel, some ? How large ? Very interested in the techniques for this used by others. The bottom line is whether or not you are going to catch and release or not. If you're planning to release them, the rule of thumb is to get them in and off as quickly as possible, but this is often tempered by how bored you are from a long, dry spell of no fish. If I get a New England sized fish (10-14 inches) on, and I've been catching them regularly, I'll have that little guy off the hook in under a minute...drag him in, grab the hook (without touching the fish), and twist it loose while holding him at the surface of the water, if possible. No net, no hands, bye bye fish. If, on the other hand, I haven't caught anything for several hours, I might let him tug the line for 5 seconds or so, reel him in closer, let him tug a bit, then reel him in and release him. But he inevitably has the strength to take off immediately. OTOH, I've seen 4-5 pound trout fight like banshees for several minutes, making several (4, 5 or more) runs almost to the backing, finally getting dragged in on their sides when they were too tired to fart, and then be held out of the water for 1-2 minutes while we tried to get the hook out of their mouth from them swallowing it beyond the knot. Then have them be held in the air for another 15-30 seconds while we untangled them from the net, fiddled with the camera, posed and took the shot, then finally (FINALLY) placed them back in the water, looking pretty well stunned. They would sit at our ankles wondering what the hell hit them for about 5 minutes, then disappear with a snap of their tail. Current wisdom says that large fish are a LOT more resiliant than we give them credit for, although I don't think this is true for smaller ones or stockies. And there is also evidence that tortured fish like the aforementioned often end up dying later in the day from the lactic acid buildup from their workout. So if you intend to release them, play with them like you'd play with an egg...gently and with caution, and get them released as quickly as is reasonable. --riverman |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
To be safe, it would be wisest to catch and release as soon as absolutely
possible, but the colder the water, the less you have to worry. In the spring, I often get Lake Trout on the fly rod and those brutes can put up a terrific fight. The fight usually last a long time (taking line - giving it back - and taking it out again), and after pictures and admiring their beauty, they are good to go - no problem. When the water warms up considerably, its another story. On a lake where a summer thermocline develops, those fish are spent by the time you get them in the boat. I have spent up to 15 minutes reviving a lake trout when the surface temperature of the water was over 70. "Bob" wrote in message om... Hi, New at this, and would like to see a discussion on the subject of "playing a fish" when flyfishing for trout. For "typical" sized New England trout, e.g. rainbows and brookies, do you folks literally just haul them in (certainly no problem in overpowering them even with very thin tippet sizes), or do you like to "play" them some, and tire them a bit, before landing them. Which is better for the fish' chance of surviving ? Do you wait until you have a real large sized trout on before "playing him" off the reel, some ? How large ? Very interested in the techniques for this used by others. Thanks, B. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
To be safe, it would be wisest to catch and release as soon as absolutely
possible, but the colder the water, the less you have to worry. In the spring, I often get Lake Trout on the fly rod and those brutes can put up a terrific fight. The fight usually last a long time (taking line - giving it back - and taking it out again), and after pictures and admiring their beauty, they are good to go - no problem. When the water warms up considerably, its another story. On a lake where a summer thermocline develops, those fish are spent by the time you get them in the boat. I have spent up to 15 minutes reviving a lake trout when the surface temperature of the water was over 70. "Bob" wrote in message om... Hi, New at this, and would like to see a discussion on the subject of "playing a fish" when flyfishing for trout. For "typical" sized New England trout, e.g. rainbows and brookies, do you folks literally just haul them in (certainly no problem in overpowering them even with very thin tippet sizes), or do you like to "play" them some, and tire them a bit, before landing them. Which is better for the fish' chance of surviving ? Do you wait until you have a real large sized trout on before "playing him" off the reel, some ? How large ? Very interested in the techniques for this used by others. Thanks, B. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Ken Fortenberry wrote: On the other hand, I try to get every fish, no matter how small, on the reel instead of just pulling them in by hand which would probably be a little quicker. It just seems like the honorable thing to do. More honorable to use a method that in some situations is less efficient and results in a longer fight? Strange choice of words. Pretentious, misguided, rigid, elitist, or ..... (not that I think it's a "bad" thing to do) but honorable? Maybe it does say something about how you view honor? Willi |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Ken Fortenberry wrote: On the other hand, I try to get every fish, no matter how small, on the reel instead of just pulling them in by hand which would probably be a little quicker. It just seems like the honorable thing to do. More honorable to use a method that in some situations is less efficient and results in a longer fight? Strange choice of words. Pretentious, misguided, rigid, elitist, or ..... (not that I think it's a "bad" thing to do) but honorable? Maybe it does say something about how you view honor? Willi |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Willi wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote: On the other hand, I try to get every fish, no matter how small, on the reel instead of just pulling them in by hand which would probably be a little quicker. It just seems like the honorable thing to do. More honorable to use a method that in some situations is less efficient and results in a longer fight? Strange choice of words. Pretentious, misguided, rigid, elitist, or .... (not that I think it's a "bad" thing to do) but honorable? Maybe it does say something about how you view honor? I try to honor the fish, which would generally mean bonking them on the head and eating their flesh while thanking the fish spirit for sustenance. In terms of catch and release, I try to honor the fish by catching them properly, with respect, and releasing them them same way. For me, catching them properly means getting them on the reel. YMMV. -- Ken Fortenberry |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Willi wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote: On the other hand, I try to get every fish, no matter how small, on the reel instead of just pulling them in by hand which would probably be a little quicker. It just seems like the honorable thing to do. More honorable to use a method that in some situations is less efficient and results in a longer fight? Strange choice of words. Pretentious, misguided, rigid, elitist, or .... (not that I think it's a "bad" thing to do) but honorable? Maybe it does say something about how you view honor? I try to honor the fish, which would generally mean bonking them on the head and eating their flesh while thanking the fish spirit for sustenance. In terms of catch and release, I try to honor the fish by catching them properly, with respect, and releasing them them same way. For me, catching them properly means getting them on the reel. YMMV. -- Ken Fortenberry |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How to catch fish all day | Bob La Londe | Bass Fishing | 9 | May 25th, 2004 05:46 PM |
Scientific Research confirms that fish feel pain: INTENSIVE FISH FARMING | John | UK Coarse Fishing | 7 | October 7th, 2003 03:00 PM |
Scientific Research confirms that fish feel pain: INTENSIVE FISH FARMING | John | General Discussion | 3 | October 6th, 2003 09:50 PM |
Scientific Research confirms that fish feel pain: INTENSIVE FISH FARMING | John | UK Sea Fishing | 3 | October 6th, 2003 09:50 PM |
TR for the Bighorn Micro Clave and a Trip to Chas's | Warren | Fly Fishing | 102 | September 29th, 2003 03:19 PM |