![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I finally got some time and created a web site for a few of the
pictures I took over the the past 8 months. Sorry about the poor resolution but the server I am using will only allow small files. The pictures on the web site are about 100k compared to the pics stored on my PC that are 5 megs each. I lost a good chunk of resolution in the scale down process. I hope you all have a great fall season and as for me its time to head back to the sal****er and catch some stripers and after that I'll fish for steelhead up north. Heres the URL for the site http://home.comcast.net/~montaukbruce/wsb/index.html Click the Photos link then click a photo to enlarge it. Tight lines Softhackle |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pic's are awsome Bruce.............could you imagine if some of those insects
were human size the perla stone looks like Freddy Cougar i think he's the one with the hockey mask in minicure......... Handyman Mike Standing in a river waving a stick |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pic's are awsome Bruce.............could you imagine if some of those insects
were human size the perla stone looks like Freddy Cougar i think he's the one with the hockey mask in minicure......... Handyman Mike Standing in a river waving a stick |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 15 Oct 2004 18:59:35 -0700,
(Softhackle) wrote: Heres the URL for the site http://home.comcast.net/~montaukbruce/wsb/index.html Click the Photos link then click a photo to enlarge it. Nice pics. Detail is good. Very good. I've never imagined a fish could look as po'd as that "Future of Penn's" little guy. Cute. Cyli r.bc: vixen. Minnow goddess. Speaker to squirrels. Often taunted by trout. http://www.visi.com/~cyli |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Softhackle wrote:
I finally got some time and created a web site for a few of the pictures I took over the the past 8 months. Sorry about the poor resolution but the server I am using will only allow small files. The pictures on the web site are about 100k compared to the pics stored on my PC that are 5 megs each. I lost a good chunk of resolution in the scale down process. They look great to me. I don't think they were compressed too much for viewing on the web. When viewing them on a computer screen there would be little difference with an uncompressed image, IMO. If you had posted the original 5 Meg pix, only a fraction of the picture would have filled the computer screen. Willi |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Softhackle wrote:
I finally got some time and created a web site for a few of the pictures I took over the the past 8 months. Sorry about the poor resolution but the server I am using will only allow small files. The pictures on the web site are about 100k compared to the pics stored on my PC that are 5 megs each. I lost a good chunk of resolution in the scale down process. They look great to me. I don't think they were compressed too much for viewing on the web. When viewing them on a computer screen there would be little difference with an uncompressed image, IMO. If you had posted the original 5 Meg pix, only a fraction of the picture would have filled the computer screen. Willi |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
They look great to me. I don't think they were compressed too much for
viewing on the web. When viewing them on a computer screen there would be little difference with an uncompressed image, IMO. If you had posted the original 5 Meg pix, only a fraction of the picture would have filled the computer screen. Willi Folks thanks for the kind words and I hope you enjoy the pictures. What compression does to a picture is it strips it of detail. The picture will look great from far away but when you zoom in you'll notice the quality suffers. Compression gives you larger Pixels and a lesser amount of pixels per inch. So instead of 1000 pixels per inch you get 100 pixels per inch. The shots I have on my PC I can zoom in to the point of counting the individual hairs on the edges of the wings. I have pretty much the whole year of hatches for Penns Creek and over the winter I'll try to post some of them. Softhackle |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
They look great to me. I don't think they were compressed too much for
viewing on the web. When viewing them on a computer screen there would be little difference with an uncompressed image, IMO. If you had posted the original 5 Meg pix, only a fraction of the picture would have filled the computer screen. Willi Folks thanks for the kind words and I hope you enjoy the pictures. What compression does to a picture is it strips it of detail. The picture will look great from far away but when you zoom in you'll notice the quality suffers. Compression gives you larger Pixels and a lesser amount of pixels per inch. So instead of 1000 pixels per inch you get 100 pixels per inch. The shots I have on my PC I can zoom in to the point of counting the individual hairs on the edges of the wings. I have pretty much the whole year of hatches for Penns Creek and over the winter I'll try to post some of them. Softhackle |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, Bruce, they're great pics and will go a long way towards my tying for
the Penns. Thanks again. -- Frank Reid Reverse email to reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
TR: Penns Creek - Sorta (part one) | Frank Reid | Fly Fishing | 10 | October 5th, 2004 01:55 PM |
TR Penns Creek | Wayne | Fly Fishing | 2 | June 22nd, 2004 01:43 AM |
Penns Creek - Carolina cabin | Jeff Miller | Fly Fishing | 18 | January 6th, 2004 02:45 AM |
penns creek 2004 | Jeff Miller | Fly Fishing | 34 | November 5th, 2003 03:01 AM |
TR: Trip to Ransaran Creek part I | Roger Ohlund | Fly Fishing | 1 | October 10th, 2003 09:34 PM |