Its looking grim

Bill Kiene wrote:

If and when our Muslim friends are successful in getting a nuclear bomb off
in a major US city it will all take care of it's self.

I have lots of Muslim friends, none of whom would dream of getting any
sort of bomb off anywhere, so you must be talking about *your* Muslim
friends. How many of them have you got, anyway? Take your time.... at
the very least you've got a few million of your fellow U.S. citizens to
choose from.

JR

Bill Kiene wrote:

If and when our Muslim friends are successful in getting a nuclear bomb off
in a major US city it will all take care of it's self.

I have lots of Muslim friends, none of whom would dream of getting any
sort of bomb off anywhere, so you must be talking about *your* Muslim
friends. How many of them have you got, anyway? Take your time.... at
the very least you've got a few million of your fellow U.S. citizens to
choose from.

JR

"Chuck Wise" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 11:45:04 -0600, "Wolfgang"
wrote:


"Chuck Wise" wrote in message
.. .
...those of us in the "heartland"...don't
all live in trailers and drink moonshine,

Yes, we do.


Poseur.

Frotteur.

One thing's for DAMN certain: ain't no self-respecting rube in the
heartland would go by the name "Wolfgang"!

Self-respect is grossly overrated.

Wolfgang

"Bill Kiene" wrote in message
m...
If and when our Muslim friends are successful in getting a nuclear bomb
off
in a major US city it will all take care of it's self.

Automatic WWIII

--
Bill Kiene

If you have Muslim friends like that, you are in serious danger of being
arrested and held without trial under the "Patriot Act", so it might be
prudent to keep it to yourself.

MC

"Bill Kiene" wrote in message
m...
If and when our Muslim friends are successful in getting a nuclear bomb
off
in a major US city it will all take care of it's self.

Automatic WWIII

--
Bill Kiene

If you have Muslim friends like that, you are in serious danger of being
arrested and held without trial under the "Patriot Act", so it might be
prudent to keep it to yourself.

MC

"riverman" wrote in message
...

God will not help either Bush, or us. Many people here are shocked and
astounded that a whole nation can be taken in by such transparent
misinformation and fear-mongering, and allow themselves to be bullied into
giving the main perpetrator a mandate to continue. Absolutely incredible.

It appears to many, that your system fails, as it prevents better men from
ever reaching the stage where they might prevail over a war-mongering
incompetent incumbent.

MC

"riverman" wrote in message
...

God will not help either Bush, or us. Many people here are shocked and
astounded that a whole nation can be taken in by such transparent
misinformation and fear-mongering, and allow themselves to be bullied into
giving the main perpetrator a mandate to continue. Absolutely incredible.

It appears to many, that your system fails, as it prevents better men from
ever reaching the stage where they might prevail over a war-mongering
incompetent incumbent.

MC

philski writes:

at least time King George was
elected and not anointed.

Sour grapes still growing.....

Read this:
http://www.flcourts.org/pubinfo/election/

The Fed Supremes did not select Bush. They ruled that the Fla Supremes could
not change the rules in mid-stream, that the Fla Supremes could not make law.
Every single re-count ended up with Bush as the winner, and there were NO
disenfranchised voters. The recounts were stopped because of Florida LAW, not
because of anything the Fed Supremes ruled.

As far as this election...... Get rid of McAuliffe. Find a candidate with a
past record you can rely on, a record you can be proud of instead of constantly
defending. Find a candidate who will pick a running mate for what he can offer
instead of a candidate from a southern state figuring that HE can win the south
or portions of it. If Kerry had picked Gephartd, he probably would have won
Missouri and Arkansas. But he didn't stand a chance picking an unknown with NO
record except chasing ambulances. Edwards may be a fine man, but he sure as
hell isn't ready for prime time.

If the Dems are to win the Whitehouse, it will never be with a candidate like
Kerry, the most liberal man in the Senate (when he's there, that is). Dukakis
would have been a better choice.

Just my 2....

philski writes:

at least time King George was
elected and not anointed.

Sour grapes still growing.....

Read this:
http://www.flcourts.org/pubinfo/election/

The Fed Supremes did not select Bush. They ruled that the Fla Supremes could
not change the rules in mid-stream, that the Fla Supremes could not make law.
Every single re-count ended up with Bush as the winner, and there were NO
disenfranchised voters. The recounts were stopped because of Florida LAW, not
because of anything the Fed Supremes ruled.

As far as this election...... Get rid of McAuliffe. Find a candidate with a
past record you can rely on, a record you can be proud of instead of constantly
defending. Find a candidate who will pick a running mate for what he can offer
instead of a candidate from a southern state figuring that HE can win the south
or portions of it. If Kerry had picked Gephartd, he probably would have won
Missouri and Arkansas. But he didn't stand a chance picking an unknown with NO
record except chasing ambulances. Edwards may be a fine man, but he sure as
hell isn't ready for prime time.

If the Dems are to win the Whitehouse, it will never be with a candidate like
Kerry, the most liberal man in the Senate (when he's there, that is). Dukakis
would have been a better choice.

Just my 2....

On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 12:06:51 -0600, "Wolfgang"
wrote:


"Chuck Wise" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 11:45:04 -0600, "Wolfgang"
wrote:


"Chuck Wise" wrote in message
.. .
...those of us in the "heartland"...don't
all live in trailers and drink moonshine,

Yes, we do.


Poseur.

Frotteur.


Wolfie, I think you're starting to rub off on me.